Three Dimensional, Short, Rough Political Test

How did you score?

  • Left-wing isolationist authoritarian

    Votes: 0 0.0%
  • Centrist (In the center of everything, give or take 2 points

    Votes: 0 0.0%

  • Total voters
    28
Joined
Apr 11, 2010
Messages
22,750
Location
Wherever my name is posted
As Earthling suggested we make a CFC version of Political Compass, I decided I would make one. Its going to be simple, and non-official, I'm just curious if I can do better than last time.

There will be 10 Questions in each category. Each Category will run from -10 to +10, and you will have five choices, Agree all the time, Agree most of the time, agree some of the time/no opinion, disagree usually, or disagree all the time. For each "Agree all the time" raise your score by 1, for each "Agree most of the time" raise it by .5, for each "Disagree usually" subtract .5 from your score. For each "Disagree all the time" decrease your score by 1. "Agree some of the time" or "No Opinion" will be counted as zero. Your score starts at zero.

Economic questions

(Positive scores are right wing, negative scores are left-wing.)

Proposition 1: Government should not create a Universal Health Care System

Proposition 2: "From Each According to his ability, to each according to his need" is not a practical way to run the Welfare State.

Proposition 3: Welfare should be limited to situations outside the person who requests its control.

Proposition 4: He who is not willing to work should not eat.

Proposition 5: Private Charity should Replace Welfare.

Proposition 6: "Corporate Welfare" should be ended.

Proposition 7: Controlling inflation will help the economy more than controlling unemployment.

Proposition 8: Government spending should be cut by 50% or more.

Proposition 9: Flat taxes should be implemented.

Proposition 10: Disaster relief is not the government's job.

The last three are a LOT more radical then the others, I don't even agree with #10, but that's the point.

Social Questions

(A positive score is authoritarian, a negative score libertarian)

Proposition 1: Government should regulate speech sometimes if it is harmful or hateful, even if the harm is indirect. (So, not allowing someone to threaten the president's life wouldn't count;))

Proposition 2: The government should not repeal drug possession laws.

Proposition 3: "Government's job is to protect us from each other, when it oversteps its bounds is when it tries to protect us from ourselves" is NOT a good way to make laws.

Proposition 4: Abortion should always be illegal (I hate this question but I'm doing it anyway to be balanced;))

Proposition 5: Handguns should not be allowed for home-protection and target shooting.

Proposition 6: Weapons are not a good last resort against government tyranny (Intentionally more radical then #5 to divide the big time libertarians from the sort of libertarians.)

Proposition 7: Prostitution should be banned.

Proposition 8: Gay marriage should be banned (I originally had this down as #3 but for comical effect I changed it;))

Proposition 9: Public Smoking (In a private restaurant or business, not outdoors) should be banned.

Proposition 10: The Draft should be used.

Foreign Policy Questions

(Positive numbers are interventionist, negative numbers are isolationist)

Proposition 1: Invading a nation simply because it is tyrannical can be a good idea for the most authoritarian and tyrannical regimes.

Proposition 2: If a portion of your country decides to leave, allowing it should not be considered.

Proposition 3: Each Nation doesn't have the sovereign right to do what it wants, if its people don't like it, change should come from outside if the inside can't do it.

Proposition 4: Defying international law can be justified at times.

Proposition 5: Pacifism is a bad foreign policy.

Proposition 6: You should fight in situations other than if directly attacked first.

Proposition 7: I feel that spreading liberty to others does not disproportionately reduce my own liberty.

Proposition 8: We should put diplomatic pressure on cultures that we consider barbaric or to be denying people their human rights.

Proposition 9: We should not significantly reduce our nuclear arms arsenal.

Proposition 10: The UN has the right to make decisions for countries at times.

NOTE: If you scored a centrist score in one or two issues, choose the positive one if your number is 0 or higher, and the negative number if its less than 0. The "Centrist" option is only for centrists in ALL the categories.
 
Yeah. I didn't actually take the test, I just voted according to what I'd probably get. It should be noted that non-militarism=/= isolationism though.
 
Economic questions

(Positive scores are right wing, negative scores are left-wing.)

Proposition 1: Government should not create a Universal Health Care System

Agree always +1.

Proposition 2: "From Each According to his ability, to each according to his need" is not a practical way to run the Welfare State.


Agree always +1.

Proposition 3: Welfare should be limited to situations outside the person who requests its control.

Agree always +1.

Proposition 4: He who is not willing to work should not eat.

Agree always +1.

Proposition 5: Private Charity should Replace Welfare.

Agree usually +0.5.

Proposition 6: "Corporate Welfare" should be ended.

Agree always +1.

Proposition 7: Controlling inflation will help the economy more than controlling unemployment.

Agree always +1.

Proposition 8: Government spending should be cut by 50% or more.

Agree always +1.

Proposition 9: Flat taxes should be implemented.

Agree always +1.

Proposition 10: Disaster relief is not the government's job.

Don't ever agree. -1.

So, my economic right-wing score is +7.5. Pretty accurate for me I think when compared to the rest of my country overall.



Proposition 1: Government should regulate speech sometimes if it is harmful or hateful, even if the harm is indirect. (So, not allowing someone to threaten the president's life wouldn't count;))

I don't ever agree. -1.

Proposition 2: The government should not repeal drug possession laws.

I almost always disagree, except with the hardest drugs. -0.5

Proposition 3: "Government's job is to protect us from each other, when it oversteps its bounds is when it tries to protect us from ourselves" is NOT a good way to make laws.

I disagree most of the time. -0.5 (I can think of a handful of VERY extreme situations where I wouldn't support it, but I won't even speak them as they are so repulsive.

Proposition 4: Abortion should always be illegal (I hate this question but I'm doing it anyway to be balanced;))

Agree. +1.

Proposition 5: Handguns should not be allowed for home-protection and target shooting.

Disagree always. -1.

Proposition 6: Weapons are not a good last resort against government tyranny (Intentionally more radical then #5 to divide the big time libertarians from the sort of libertarians.)

Disagree always -1.

Proposition 7: Prostitution should be banned.

Mostly disagree, but no strong opinion. -0.5.

Proposition 8: Gay marriage should be banned (I originally had this down as #3 but for comical effect I changed it;))

I'd consider myself to be neutral as I think they should be given a domestic or civil partnership with the same benefits. 0.

Proposition 9: Public Smoking (In a private restaurant or business, not outdoors) should be banned.

Disagree totally -1.

Proposition 10: The Draft should be used.

Disagree usually. I think if we were invaded it would be ok. -0.5.

So -5, pretty libertarian. I think that's accurate as I do have a conservative side too, though it only shows up on occasion.

Foreign Policy Questions

(Positive numbers are interventionist, negative numbers are isolationist)

Proposition 1: Invading a nation simply because it is tyrannical can be a good idea for the most authoritarian and tyrannical regimes.

Agree +1.

Proposition 2: If a portion of your country decides to leave, allowing it should not be considered.

Disagree -1.

Proposition 3: Each Nation doesn't have the sovereign right to do what it wants, if its people don't like it, change should come from outside if the inside can't do it.

Agree usually. +0.5

Proposition 4: Defying international law can be justified at times.

Agree +1.

Proposition 5: Pacifism is a bad foreign policy.

Agree +1.

Proposition 6: You should fight in situations other than if directly attacked first.

Agree +1.
Proposition 7: I feel that spreading liberty to others does not disproportionately reduce my own liberty.

Agree Usually + 0.5.

Proposition 8: We should put diplomatic pressure on cultures that we consider barbaric or to be denying people their human rights.

Agree +1.

Proposition 9: We should not significantly reduce our nuclear arms arsenal.

Neutral. Not just because but we can destroy the world 5 times so its not the end of the world (No pun intended;)) if we destroy some. 0.

Proposition 10: The UN has the right to make decisions for countries at times.

Agree sometimes. Depends on the situation. In countries with a good human rights standard, no, but with a poor one yes. 0.

4.5. I am fairly interventionalist, though less so in practice then theory. I think my score is accurate.

So, right-wing interventionalist libertarian. I consider this accurate.

Final Scores:

Economic Right-wing +7.5

Social Libertarian -5

Interventionalism +4.5
 
Very American in its preocupations.

Lacks any consideration of green/environmental/sustainability questions whatsoever. No consideration of any sort of questions about the ethics of materialism/consumerism/capitalism. This means it exists within a bubble which assumes a certain position about some of the most significant preocupations facing politics in our world simply don't matter, thus narrowing its scope dramatically.
 
Very American in its preocupations.

Lacks any consideration of green/environmental questions whatsoever. No consideration of any sort of questions about the ethics of materialism/consumerism/capitalism. This means it exists within a bubble which assumes these things don't matter, thus narrowing its scope dramatically.

Where would environmental questions fit? Economics or social?

As for capitalism, I'd consider answering yes to Prop 2 to be pretty blatantly opposing capitalism.
 
@Adjica and Madviking- Did you consider the test to be accurate?

@Perfection- I didn't want to overload the poll. If you are centrist in one or two, then just vote with the positive option if your score was positive or zero, and the negative option if your score was negative. However, I felt being totally centrist warranted its own option.
 
See, there's your first problem.

Well, personally I consider Radical environmentalism (AKA Gore or Nader) to simply be dumb and, frankly, not to fit in with politics. If you want to believe it fine, but its a fringe opinion. And it contradicts economic AND social liberty.

If you are talking about basic environmentalism (You know, the more moderate policies) I consider them good ideas just for practical reasons (No the Earth won't burn but the air a bit more unhealthy? Sure) and I don't think its a political issue either.
 
-8, -3.5, -2.
The last section is completly bull. I am somewhat of an Internationalist, yet I got an isolationist score?
A few question disagreements.
Economic:proposition 8: Government spending should be cut by 50% or more.
At our current tax level yes. No matter how much I endorse socialism, if we can't afford it we shouldn't do it. That is why we should raise taxes to compensate.

Social:proposition 10: The Draft should be used.
Stupid. If the draft needs to be done, than do it. I hardly think that qualifies as authoritarian.

Foreign: Proposition 2: If a portion of your country decides to leave, allowing it should not be considered.
I voted -.5, but with reservations! Secession can be legal if they have very good reasons, all avenues to redress grievances denied, or gone through legal channels.
Proposition 5: Pacifism is a bad foreign policy.
This depends. Not getting involved in conflicts around the world is good, but that doesn't make me a pacifist.

This test is a bit better than your Libertarian one. Still isn't very good though.
 
Proposition 8: Government spending should be cut by 50% or more.

How can you always agree with this?

What if government spending is already really low?

What if government spending was cut by 90% the year prior?

What if government income is incredibly high, much higher than the also very high expenditures, even though taxes are very low?

Proposition 1: Government should not create a Universal Health Care System

How is this a right wing economic option given the assumption that universal health care costs less for the government to run?
 
Like I said, extremely narrow-minded and American.

I meant answering no to it. In any case, "From each according to his ability, to each according to his need" is basically communism's definition. Now I know you don't get any more extreme a score for it, but chances are you'll answer yes to the others as well.

Also, I am interested in everybody's absolute scores.

Also, if this is too American based, someone else could always make a European based one.
 
How can you always agree with this?

What if government spending is already really low?

What if government spending was cut by 90% the year prior?

What if government income is incredibly high, much higher than the also very high expenditures, even though taxes are very low?

I meant that I completely agreed. That would be the equivalent on those questions.
How is this a right wing economic option given the assumption that universal health care costs less for the government to run?

Not the US version of the right, they just want to get rid of it, but if you support it, you might still be a more moderate definition of right.
 
Dom said:
Not the US version of the right, they just want to get rid of it, but if you support it, you might still be a more moderate definition of right.
If we assume Arwons supposition to be true, that a UHC costs lest than a private version, why would the republicans prefer a more expensive version?
Placing ideology over effectivness are we now?
WWBD?
(What would Bismarck do?)
 
-8, -3.5, -2.
The last section is completly bull. I am somewhat of an Internationalist, yet I got an isolationist score?
Meh, I know its not perfect.


=

At our current tax level yes. No matter how much I endorse socialism, if we can't afford it we shouldn't do it. That is why we should raise taxes to compensate.

Then you support raising taxes, NOT reducing spending. I see no problem. Vote -1.

Stupid. If the draft needs to be done, than do it. I hardly think that qualifies as authoritarian.

I agree with this, if there is a good reason for it, but that's why I voted -0.5. In an anarchistic society (The extreme of libertarianism) any draft would be not allowed. But, I am a libertarian and think it is necessary at times.

Now, if you support a draft even in peacetime, that's DEFINITELY authoritarian! If you support it only in wars such as Vietnam or outright invasion, you'd vote sometimes and your score wouldn't change!


I voted -.5, but with reservations! Secession can be legal if they have very good reasons, all avenues to redress grievances denied, or gone through legal channels.

You should have voted +0.5. The proposition was anti-secession, which you usually agree with.

And, that's why you usually agree instead of all;)

This depends. Not getting involved in conflicts around the world is good, but that doesn't make me a pacifist.

Fine, it was an extreme proposition intentionally, while others are more moderate.

This test is a bit better than your Libertarian one. Still isn't very good though.

But is it bad? Average? Sort of good?
 
If we assume Arwons supposition to be true, that a UHC costs lest than a private version, why would the republicans prefer a more expensive version?
Placing ideology over effectivness are we now?
WWBD?
(What would Bismarck do?)

But still, it is paid for by taxes, which means it will cost SOME people more.

And, that's just the way it is. I agree with them. I'm sure you don't. Just vote no then, its not just an "Are you right wing" but "How far right wing are you?" (Or left wing.)
 
Top Bottom