amadeus
オ前ヨリ平静〜
Seems unnecessary; is it really worth hurting our relations with Turkey?
is it really worth hurting our relations with Turkey?

Seems unnecessary; is it really worth hurting our relations with Turkey?

non-binding resolutions are a waste of time.
Would you support an actual binding one? FOr eg, restrictions on trade until the genocide is recognized as such?
Seems unnecessary; is it really worth hurting our relations with Turkey?
Genocide? Sure. Waste of time? Absolutely.
)Would you support an actual binding one? FOr eg, restrictions on trade until the genocide is recognized as such?

Dude...we are talking about something that happened in 1915-1917. I mean, wth.![]()

Well, you didn't really qualify your previous statement with anything about the genocide itself, or if it was going to far/no far enough.
Just thought I'd check![]()

I didnt realize it needed to be qualified. Again, non-binding resolutions are absolutely stupid. Non-binding resolutions in regards to issues almost 100 years gone are even more absolutely stupid.


If this gets passed, you better believe Turkey will invade Kurdish Iraq soon. they wont give a . .. .. .. . if the US dosent like it


What about all the other nations and institutions in the world?
For one, the EU springs to mind- Turkeys still pretty keen not to offend it as far as I know. I also imagine that there quite keen on there membership in NATO, which I expect would be imperilled by such an invasion
Incidentally, Could someone explain why it's congress' job to decide history, surely they should be governing....?![]()
French said it was a genocide, European Parliament said it was a genocide, so what's all the fuzz about?
Everybody except Turkey recognize it as genocide.