Besides everything, sure. Changing the rules is a process. Depriving rights is a process. It's all interpretive at one step. How that interpretive dance is done by the unelected cabal of career alcoholics is tied up with the whole process, start to finish. How much change to the process is allowed, at that step?
Again, this has nothing to do with actually-existing originalism as a philosophy motivating the actions of actual jurists, as opposed to whatever holistic idea of originalism is contained in your mind.