Trumps lawyers also seem to be rather dumb
Then again they holding a losing hand and they might as well just gaslight.

Donald Trump's lawyers say there is 'no cause for alarm' over FBI's investigation into classified documents​

Lawyers for former US president Donald Trump have downplayed the discovery of classified documents at his Florida home, telling a federal judge there was no "cause for alarm".
"Simply put, the notion that presidential records would contain sensitive information should have never been cause for alarm," Mr Trump's attorneys said.
Mr Trump was engaging in a "standard give-and-take" with the US National Archives over the return of presidential records, his attorneys said.
They said he allowed FBI agents to "come to his home and provide security advice".
Mr Trump's lawyers took a swipe at the Department of Justice (DOJ) for "gratuitously" including a photograph of "allegedly classified materials" that had been "pulled from a container and spread across the floor for dramatic effect".

 
Last edited:
lmao :lol:

Karl Rove tells Fox News that Trump wasn’t allowed to take papers from White House: ‘It’s verboten’​

Former George W Bush administration adviser Karl Rove tore into Donald Trump on Wednesday for taking sensitive White House documents to Mar-a-Lago, saying the former president had “no right to do so” under the law.
“Let’s be clear on this. None of these government documents are his to have taken,” Mr Rove said, interrupting a host on Fox News who referred to some of the documents in question as belonging to Mr Trump.
“A lot of the former president’s problems are of his own creation,” the Republican politico continued. “Under the Presidential Records Act of 1978, you cannot take original documents out of the White House when you leave, whether it’s the president of the United States or any of his aides. It’s verboten under the law.”
https://www.independent.co.uk/news/...tics/karl-rove-donald-trump-fbi-b2157143.html
 
Here's the link if people want to use clicks to reward Fox for hiring Rove to seed the gravel of the road they're going to throw Trump onto as the bus is coming.
 
Arsehole Trump would give ‘full pardons with an apology’ to Capitol rioters if elected again

I think he'd try to pardon "everyone associated with it" in general.
 
One "uncle" has gotten back to me, finding Barr persuasive, and that he had assumed it was another tempest in a teapot and wasn't really paying attention


According to cnn, Trump gave a 2-hour speech yesterday. If voters came away more inflamed after such a marathon, that's actually quite worrying. That's an amazing amount of energy compared to Biden.
 
Last edited:
Interesting he called Biden an "enemy of the state," which is exactly called the news media, Democrats, "nasty" women like RBG, and many, many others. Remind me, who was it who sent an armed mob to storm the Capitol?
 
There's that saying: if you meet an a-hole in the morning, that's a tough break; if you meet a-holes all day long, it means you're the a-hole.

If everybody else is the "enemy of the state," it's you who is the enemy of the state.
 

Elected Officials, Police Chiefs on Leaked Oath Keepers List​

Published September 7th, 2022 at 4:54 pm, Last Updated September 7th, 2022 at 6:01 pm

By ALANNA DURKIN RICHER and MICHAEL KUNZELMAN Associated Press

The names of hundreds of U.S. law enforcement officers, elected officials and military members appear on the leaked membership rolls of a far-right extremist group that’s accused of playing a key role in the Jan. 6, 2021, insurrection at the U.S. Capitol, according to a report released Wednesday.

The Anti-Defamation League Center on Extremism pored over more than 38,000 names on leaked Oath Keepers membership lists and identified more than 370 people it believes currently work in law enforcement agencies — including as police chiefs and sheriffs — and more than 100 people who are currently members of the military.

It also identified more than 80 people who were running for or served in public office as of early August. The membership information was compiled into a database published by the transparency collective Distributed Denial of Secrets.

The data raises fresh concerns about the presence of extremists in law enforcement and the military who are tasked with enforcing laws and protecting the U.S. It’s especially problematic for public servants to be associated with extremists at a time when lies about the 2020 election are fueling threats of violence against lawmakers and institutions.

“Even for those who claimed to have left the organization when it began to employ more aggressive tactics in 2014, it is important to remember that the Oath Keepers have espoused extremism since their founding, and this fact was not enough to deter these individuals from signing up,” the report says.

Appearing in the Oath Keepers’ database doesn’t prove that a person was ever an active member of the group or shares its ideology. Some people on the list contacted by The Associated Press said they were briefly members years ago and are no longer affiliated with the group. Some said they were never dues-paying members.

“Their views are far too extreme for me,” said Shawn Mobley, sheriff of Otero County, Colorado. Mobley told the AP in an email that he distanced himself from the Oath Keepers years ago over concerns about its involvement in the standoff against the federal government at Bundy Ranch in Bunkerville, Nevada, among other things.

The Oath Keepers, founded in 2009 by Stewart Rhodes, is a loosely organized conspiracy theory-fueled group that recruits current and former military, police and first responders. It asks its members to vow to defend the Constitution “against all enemies, foreign and domestic,” promotes the belief that the federal government is out to strip citizens of their civil liberties and paints its followers as defenders against tyranny.

More than two dozen people associated with the Oath Keepers — including Rhodes — have been charged in connection with the Jan. 6 attack. Rhodes and four other Oath Keeper members or associates are heading to trial this month on seditious conspiracy charges for what prosecutors have described as a weekslong plot to keep then-President Donald Trump in power. Rhodes and the other Oath Keepers say that they are innocent and that there was no plan to attack the Capitol.

The Oath Keepers has grown quickly along with the wider anti-government movement and used the tools of the internet to spread their message during Barack Obama’s presidency, said Rachel Carroll Rivas, interim deputy director of research with the Southern Poverty Law Center’s Intelligence Project. But since Jan. 6 and Rhodes’ arrest, the group has struggled to keep members, she said.

That’s partly because Oath Keepers had been associated so strongly with Rhodes that the removal of the central figure had an outsized impact, and partly because many associated with the group were often those who wanted to be considered respectable in their communities, she said.

“The image of being associated with Jan. 6 was too much for many of those folks,” she said.

Among the elected officials whose name appears on the membership lists is South Dakota state Rep. Phil Jensen, who won a June Republican primary in his bid for reelection. Jensen told the AP he paid for a one-year membership in 2014 but never received any Oath Keepers’ literature, attended any meetings or renewed his membership.

Jensen said he felt compelled to join because he “believed in the oath that we took to support the US Constitution and to defend it against enemies foreign and domestic.” He wouldn’t say whether he now disavows the Oath Keepers, saying he doesn’t have enough information about the group today.

“Back in 2014, they appeared to be a pretty solid conservative group, I can’t speak to them now,” he said.

ADL said it found the names of at least 10 people who now work as police chiefs and 11 sheriffs. All of the police chiefs and sheriffs who responded to the AP said they no longer have any ties to the group.

“I don’t even know what they’re posting. I never get any updates,” said Mike Hollinshead, sheriff of Idaho’s Elmore County. “I’m not paying dues or membership fees or anything.”

Hollinshead, a Republican, said he was campaigning for sheriff several years ago when voters asked him if he was familiar with the Oath Keepers. Hollinshead said he wanted to learn about the group and recalls paying for access to content on the Oath Keepers’ website, but that was the extent of his involvement.

Benjamin Boeke, police chief in Oskaloosa, Iowa, recalled getting emails from the group years ago and said he believes a friend may have signed him up. But he said he never paid to become a member and doesn’t know anything about the group.

Eric Williams, police chief in Idalou, Texas, also said in an email that he hasn’t been a member or had any interaction with the Oath Keepers in over 10 years. He called the storming of the Capitol “terrible in every way.”

“I pray this country finds its way back to civility and peace in discourse with one another,” he said.

Click on the interactive map showing registration by state here.


 
Hollinshead, a Republican, said he was campaigning for sheriff several years ago when voters asked him if he was familiar with the Oath Keepers. Hollinshead said he wanted to learn about the group and recalls paying for access to content on the Oath Keepers’ website, but that was the extent of his involvement.
If you were doing this, why would you use your real name?
 
Because you had nothing to hide // Because you are stupid

Can be both malicious and innocent.
 

Steve Bannon indicted on state charges of money laundering, conspiracy and fraud related to border wall effort​

By Kara Scannell, Hannah Rabinowitz and Shawna Mizelle, CNN
Updated 1:21 PM ET, Thu September 8, 2022

(CNN)Former Donald Trump aide Steve Bannon was indicted on state charges of money laundering, conspiracy and fraud related to an alleged online scheme to raise money for the construction of a wall along the southern US border, according to an indictment obtained by CNN.

Bannon surrendered Thursday morning to authorities and is expected to plead not guilty when arraigned, his attorney Robert Costello told CNN. The state charges are based on the same conduct Bannon was charged with by federal prosecutors in 2020 that alleged he and three others had defrauded donors in the border wall effort, which raised more than $15 million. Presidential pardons do not apply to state investigations, however.

According to the indictment, one of Bannon's associates who isn't named created an online fundraising platform to raise money to build a wall on the border. In order to receive the money from donors, the organizer promised that "100% of the funds" would go towards building a border wall, and he would not be taking a salary from the project, prosecutors say.
Bannon's associates discussed telling the public that no one involved in the "We Build The Wall" project would take a salary, according to the indictment. In a text message, one of the associates told Bannon that the claim "removes all self interest taint on this" and it "gives [the CEO] saint hood," the indictment says.

Bannon publicly claimed he was acting "kind of as a volunteer" for We Build The Wall, prosecutors said in the indictment. Behind the scenes, Bannon allegedly helped to funnel hundreds of thousands of dollars to himself and his associates.
Bannon appeared to blame his situation on political motivations.

"This an irony, on the very day the mayor of this city has a delegation down on the border, they are persecuting people here, that try to stop them at the border" he told reporters outside the DA's office Thursday.
"This is all about 60 days from the day," he said later, referencing the November election. The Manhattan district attorney's office launched a criminal investigation into Bannon's "We Build the Wall" crowd-fundraising activities early last year after then-President Trump pardoned Bannon on federal fraud charges relating to the same alleged scheme.

Bannon had been federally charged with diverting more than $1 million to pay an alleged co-conspirator and cover hundreds of thousands of dollars in personal expenses. Prosecutors alleged that the donors, including some in New York, were falsely told that all the money contributed would go toward the construction effort. In recent months, several people close to Bannon were brought before the state grand jury.

Manhattan prosecutors subpoenaed bank records and quietly worked on the investigation over the past year as they investigated Trump and his real estate business, sources familiar with the matter previously told CNN. But the district attorney's office deferred a charging decision on Bannon until federal prosecutors concluded their case against his three co-defendants, who were not pardoned.

[IMG alt="Steve Bannon's request for a new trial is rejected by federal judge"]https://cdn.cnn.com/cnnnext/dam/assets/220722153125-02-steve-bannon-0722-medium-plus-169.jpg[/IMG]


Bannon issued a statement late Tuesday, in part calling the indictment "phony charges" and "nothing more than a partisan political weaponization of the criminal justice system."
"I am proud to be a leading voice on protecting our borders and building a wall to keep our country safe from drugs and violent criminals," he said in the statement, adding: "They are coming after all of us, not only President Trump and myself. I am never going to stop fighting. In fact, I have not yet begun to fight. They will have to kill me first."

A federal jury in July found Bannon guilty of contempt of Congress for defying a subpoena from the House select committee investigating the January 6, 2021, US Capitol attack. He is scheduled to be sentenced in October and faces a minimum sentence of 30 days in jail, according to federal law.

 
The criminal justice system is a weapon . . . against criminals!
 
If you were doing this, why would you use your real name?
One wonders if he would have used his own name had the group been communist, or transgender, or something.
 
According to BuzzFeed, a draft article for The Washington Post in 2016 featured a quote from Trump about his then-13-year-old daughter in which he asked an unnamed associated, "Is it wrong to be more sexually attracted to your own daughter than your wife?" The quote was part of a copy which was circulated to other journalists, although the paper ultimately omitted it from publication. However, WaPo has not discredited the accuracy of the quote, and it does seem to resemble something quoted to The New York Times. In that piece, at least one former beauty contestant was asked by Trump about Ivanka, who was still a teenager at the time and hosted the Miss Teen USA pageant, "Don't you think my daughter's hot? She's hot right?"

Read More: https://www.nickiswift.com/125109/t...nappropriate-toward-ivanka/?utm_campaign=clip
 
Trump to Face Sexual Battery Suit Under New 'Survivors' Law

E. Jean Carroll, the journalist who claims she was raped by Donald Trump decades ago in a New York department store, is planning to sue him for sexual battery under the state's new "survivors" law later this year—and her attorneys now want to question Trump under oath.​
Roberta A. Kaplan, the journalist's lawyer, explained in her letter to the judge that Carroll is now preparing to file a separate lawsuit under New York's Adult Survivors Act "on the earliest possible date," which is Nov. 24.​
Kaplan also explained that Trump—as he has done in nearly every court case of late—is refusing to turn over court-mandated evidence.​
Trump "remains unwilling to produce any documents in discovery," not "a single document," Kaplan wrote.​
That's why, she said, Trump should be dragged into a room for a deposition that will question him under oath—an embarrassing exercise that could elicit damning information from the former president. And given that it's a civil case, any question Trump refuses to answer can be interpreted in the worst light possible—even as an admission.​
 

Donald Trump hit by fraud lawsuit over family business​

Donald Trump and three of his children have been hit by a fraud lawsuit after a New York investigation into their family business.
It alleges that the Trump Organization committed "numerous" acts of fraud between 2011 and 2021.
New York Attorney General Letitia James is asking a court to bar Mr Trump and his children from serving as officers or directors in any New York business.
The Trump Organization has denied any wrongdoing.
At a news conference, Ms James said that Mr Trump and the Trump Organization falsely inflated his net worth by "billions" of dollars to unjustly enrich himself and "cheat the system".
The announcement comes after Ms James rejected at last one offer to settle the long-running civil investigation into the company's business practices.

Ms James is also pushing for the Trump Organization to be barred from engaging in any future real estate transactions in the state.
She added that she is referring several criminal charges to federal prosecutors and to the Internal Revenue Service.
https://www.bbc.com/news/world-us-canada-62986812
 

What to know about the civil fraud lawsuit Donald Trump and family face in New York​


 
So Bill Barr has expressed much handwringing over Trump's children being brought into the lawsuit. Personally, I am disgusted that they are going after the child of Fred Trump.
 
Top Bottom