Indeed, but I don't think it would be a good idea to stunt the growth of the second city. Let's build them in SL if we have to.jeejeep said:Three cities with only one worker:thumbdown
We need to build some workers either in the second city or right after we build the third settler.
King Flevance said:Keep your fingers crossed for a food resource to the northwest.
Whoohoo! I just noticed the workboat will be done before the population increase. Which means super fast settlers. Anyone want to make 2 in a row? And found production then a research back to back? Or should we continue with the original plan to continue making 1 settler then monistary then another settler after that?Or any other ideas?
EDIT: How long does it take before building queue deteriations sets in?
Karl Townsend said:if we build a settler then then out city dont grow so we might as well wait one turn for the monstery to build then start the settler
Karl Townsend said:funny how the leader is the leader
King Flevance said:I have thought that a couple times myself. Maybe we should have been "The Winner" instead of King Kong. I like King Kong though, it's great.
ranathari said:It's 2640AD and we don't have a second city yet. We really need to get a move on.