Two Civs?

[BCLG100]

From what i got from everyons opinion at cdz they felt this was a bad idea. We only want one civ, post if you disagree with some very good reasons

 

[Darkness]

I agree. One civ, otherwise units wll just about be obsolete once we'll get them in a position to use them.

 

[Furiey]

One Civ - keep it simple.

 

[BCLG100]

Ok well i'll give another 12 hours for anyone to post compelling reasons otherwise.

 

[Robi D]

Already wrote a whole summary in the spam in (since i opened it first)

Everyone so far has said no (from what i've read), its just a complication that will slow an already slow game down.

Still it wouldn't be a bad idea to work out a combo in case the muppets vote it in.

My completely unscientific and unresearched suggestion would be Egypt/Vikings.
War Chariots early, Beserkers after = lots of fun creating carnage

 

[BCLG100]

Or Viking/Elizabeth

Two financial, one philo, one aggressive. 2 Very good UU's that appear at a good time for warring.

 

[Robi D]

I suppose it would depend on the map style, if it water dependant then portugal worth a look, since we would have carracks to ship beserkers

 

[grahamiam]

"1 civ" vote from me.