Gelion
Retired Captain
Lets just say that there is a difference with regard to what type of missiles are deployed. There's a reason US is positioning their cruise missiles next to Russia. Its not about "opening a new chapter in being able to strike a target". It is about being able to strike it fast and with minimal interception threat. Thats what the US is doing and thats what Russia might start to explore more seriously.In 1962, missiles in Cuba made it possible to threaten US mainland with nuclear strike - a capability USSR had previously lacked. This is why this move was seen as a huge escalation. Today, Russia has this capability anyway (see nuclear sub fleet and ICBMs with 11-16k km range).
Stationing anything on Cuba/Venezuela would change nothing except increase costs and make those assets more vulnerable.
If it was supposed to be a threat, it is rather strange one.