UN Global Commission: Drug War a Failure

civver_764

Deity
Joined
May 19, 2007
Messages
6,436
Location
San Jose, CA
http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/world-us-canada-13624303

The global war on drugs has "failed" according to a new report by a group of politicians and former world leaders.

The Global Commission on Drug Policy report calls for the legalisation of some drugs and an end to the criminalisation of drug users.


The panel includes former UN Secretary General Kofi Annan, the former leaders of Mexico, Colombia and Brazil, and the entrepreneur Sir Richard Branson.

The US and Mexican governments have rejected the findings as misguided.

The Global Commission's 24-page report argues that anti-drug policy has failed by fuelling organised crime, costing taxpayers millions of dollars and causing thousands of deaths.

It cites UN estimates that opiate use increased 35% worldwide from 1998 to 2008, cocaine by 27%, and cannabis by 8.5%.

The 19-member commission includes Mexico's former President Ernesto Zedillo, Brazil's ex-President Fernando Henrique Cardoso and former Colombian President Cesar Gaviria, as well as the former US Federal Reserve chairman Paul Volcker and the current Prime Minister of Greece George Papandreou.

The panel also features prominent Latin American writers Carlos Fuentes and Mario Vargas Llosa, the EU's former foreign policy chief Javier Solana, and George Schultz, a former US secretary of state.

'No harm to others'

The authors criticise governments who claim the current war on drugs is effective.

"Political leaders and public figures should have the courage to articulate publicly what many of them acknowledge privately: that the evidence overwhelmingly demonstrates that repressive strategies will not solve the drug problem, and that the war on drugs has not, and cannot, be won," the report said.

Instead of punishing users who the report says "do no harm to others," the commission argues that governments should end criminalisation of drug use, experiment with legal models that would undermine organised crime syndicates and offer health and treatment services for drug-users.

It calls for drug policies based on methods empirically proven to reduce crime and promote economic and social development.

The commission is especially critical of the US, saying it must abandon anti-crime approaches to drug policy and adopt strategies rooted in healthcare and human rights.

"We hope this country (the US) at least starts to think there are alternatives," said former Colombian President Cesar Gaviria.

"We don't see the US evolving in a way that is compatible with our (countries') long-term interests."

Many crimes

The office of White House drug tsar Gil Kerlikowske rejected the panel's recommendations.

"Drug addiction is a disease that can be successfully prevented and treated," said a spokesman for the Office of National Drug Control Policy.

"Making drugs more available - as this report suggests - will make it harder to keep our communities healthy and safe."

The government of Mexico, where more than 34,000 people have died in drug-related violence since a crackdown on the cartels began in December 2006, was also critical.

Legalisation would be an "insufficient and inefficient" step given the international nature of the illegal drugs trade, said National Security spokesman Alejandro Poire.

"Legalisation won't stop organised crime, nor its rivalries and violence," he said.

"To think organised crime in Mexico means drug-trafficking overlooks the other crimes committed such as kidnapping, extortion and robbery."

Only took like 40 years but they finally recognized the obvious. Of course this itself probably won't change much in countries like the US, but it sets a good precedent. I honestly can't wrap my mind around how anyone could approve of prohibition. It's ineffective, harmful, and immoral in every sense of the words.
 
Lets hope opium dens make a comeback.
 
In the US especially it will fall on deaf ears because prisons here are a for profit business, the more people they can stuff in the better, and they just love hauling in non violent drug offenders by the truckload to fill the cells. Lobbying being what it is, the congress-critters that have been bought by the prison system will never allow such a thing to happen.
 
Crazy report.

The government of Mexico, where more than 34,000 people have died in drug-related violence since a crackdown on the cartels began in December 2006, was also critical.

Legalisation would be an "insufficient and inefficient" step given the international nature of the illegal drugs trade, said National Security spokesman Alejandro Poire.

"Legalisation won't stop organised crime, nor its rivalries and violence," he said.

"To think organised crime in Mexico means drug-trafficking overlooks the other crimes committed such as kidnapping, extortion and robbery."

People on the Mexican frontline are already calling out on this suggestion.
 
I honestly can't wrap my mind around how anyone could approve of prohibition. It's ineffective, harmful, and immoral in every sense of the words.

I can, people wanting to control other people for no real good reason is just human nature;)

Just support my Presidential Campaign, you can have your drugs and we can have our guns... we're all happy;)

Just don't assassinate me, then NickyJ becomes President and we get prohibition back again;)
 
Crazy report.



People on the Mexican frontline are already calling out on this suggestion.

Organized crime is obviously a zero sum game, if we can't wipe them out entirely in one blow then we shouldn't bother weakening them at all :lol:
 
The criminalization of marijuana is stupid, a maryj joint is less harmful than a fast food joint & actually has proven therapeutic value to some.

"Political leaders and public figures should have the courage to articulate publicly what many of them acknowledge privately: that the evidence overwhelmingly demonstrates that repressive strategies will not solve the drug problem, and that the war on drugs has not, and cannot, be won," the report said.
Hear, hear!
 
Legalize the drugs. Make them safe for users, make them inexpensive, and tax them. Governmental coffers will overflow.
 
Legalize the drugs. Make them safe for users, make them inexpensive, and tax them. Governmental coffers will overflow.

And more importantly, cartels will have to find a new revenue stream. Win-win. Unless of course you're the type that likes to control how other people live, then you're probably not winning but, well, those people never have a good time long term.
 
Hurting organized crime is tertiary. The primary benefit is boosting the health of drug users, particularly IV drug users who, presumably, would be allowed access to safe drugs and clean needles. Secondary to this is the reduction in property crime used to pay for drugs, reductions in judicial and law enforcement system costs, and a white-space increase in tax revenue.

One question: presumably there would still be social pressure against drug use, particular things like heroin, much as there is a stigma against overindulgence of alcohol and use of tobacco. Hopefully, the legalization of such drugs may enable addicts to become useful members of society, but I wonder where the sweet point is between place stigma against drug use and allowing formerly ostracized parties to rejoin society.
 
Who cares what the UN says? "The UN has made his decision; now let them enforce it!"

:confused:
No they wont enforce the current way thats the idea.
They will help the users rather than gaol them.

from the Guardian about the experience in Portugal.

Before the law, which decriminalised (or depenalised) possession of drugs but still prohibited their use, the story of drug addiction in Portugal was a familiar one. More than 50% of those infected with HIV in Portugal were drug addicts, with new diagnoses of HIV among addicts running at about 3,000 a year. These days, addicts account for only 20% of those who are HIV infected, while the number of new HIV diagnoses of addicts has fallen to fewer than 2,000 a year.

Other measures have been equally encouraging. Deaths of street users from accidental overdoses also appear to have declined, as – anecdotal evidence strongly suggests – has petty crime associated with addicts who were stealing to maintain their habits. Recent surveys in schools also suggest an overall decrease in drug experimentation.

At the same time, the number of those in treatment for their addiction problems has risen by about a third from 23,500 in 1998 to 35,000 today – helped by a substantial increase in available beds, facilities and medical support – with many going on to methadone replacement programmes. The consequence is that perhaps as much as €400m (£334m) has been taken out of the illegal drugs market.

http://www.guardian.co.uk/world/2010/sep/05/portugal-drugs-debate
 
The office of White House drug tsar Gil Kerlikowske rejected the panel's recommendations.

"Drug addiction is a disease that can be successfully prevented and treated," said a spokesman for the Office of National Drug Control Policy.

"Making drugs more available - as this report suggests - will make it harder to keep our communities healthy and safe."

The government of Mexico, where more than 34,000 people have died in drug-related violence since a crackdown on the cartels began in December 2006, was also critical.

Legalisation would be an "insufficient and inefficient" step given the international nature of the illegal drugs trade, said National Security spokesman Alejandro Poire.

"Legalisation won't stop organised crime, nor its rivalries and violence," he said.

"To think organised crime in Mexico means drug-trafficking overlooks the other crimes committed such as kidnapping, extortion and robbery."

Lies bolded by me.

Just par for the course, all these lies. Saying that drug addiction is a disease that can be "treated" when really that is just lipservice. It's already been well established that the only interest of these prohibitionist goons is to arrest people and throw them in jail, since that's what keeps their paychecks coming.

The other lie where he mentions drugs being more available is well, also blatantly false. Drugs are available to anyone who wants them, since you don't have to show ID to buy illegal merchandise.

Also interesting that these Mexican prohibitionists (who get lots of anti-drug money from the US prohibitionists) point out illegal activities that aren't nearly as profitable as drug-dealing.

Did "El Chapo" become the most wealthy and powerful drug lord in the world by kidnapping people and stealing cars? Did Pablo Escobar make all his money without drugs? :rolleyes:

Who cares what the UN says? "The UN has made his decision; now let them enforce it!"

"Yeah, who cares what they say! We here in 'Murika know how to throw people in jail and waste money on non-violent crimes better than any of those Euro-sissies!"

Crazy report.

People on the Mexican frontline are already calling out on this suggestion.

Yeah, because they are on the payroll of the United States.
 
I wouldn't call it a failure. From the point of view of the US military, it's been a great sucess. The Drug war has given them the perfect excuse to ramp up military spending, increase their presence in latin america, and secretly funnel money to whichever warlords they want to support. It's also allowed the police to increase their power in the US.

Of course in terms of actually, you know, discouraging drug use it's a failure. But no one really cared about that.
 
coming.
"Yeah, who cares what they say! We here in 'Murika know how to throw people in jail and waste money on non-violent crimes better than any of those Euro-sissies!"

If Europe and others concentrated on reducing demand and treating people then the price of drugs would fall in the rest of the world.

So the use in the US would go up.
 
I agree with my Dawg that drug abuse is not a "disease". Disease is used as a buzzword these days so much it loses all meaning.
 
Best possible way to encourage Americans to support the war on drugs. Get the UN to oppose it. Smart move, UN...
 
The USA is less than 5% of the world population.
The UN is concerned with 100% of the world population.
If the USA does not want to reduce the drug use of its citizens because it would prefer to have a war, that is the choice of the US.
Obviously this will result in ever higher tax costs and the waste of American lives but at least they will have stuck up to the UN.

http://www.google.co.uk/url?sa=t&so...v_2ICw&usg=AFQjCNGj_B0CyR_oOjeyQOR0d6nvcVINQA

Click on report to get the report
 
Best possible way to encourage Americans to support the war on drugs. Get the UN to oppose it. Smart move, UN...

So, we should continue the (failed) War on Some Drugs just to stick it to the UN?

I believe that's referred to around here as cutting off your nose to spite your face.
 
Top Bottom