United Citizens of the world

Love

Deity
Joined
Feb 25, 2006
Messages
5,343
Location
On the island of fun!
http://www.unitedcitizensoftheworld.org/

A newly-started political movement with ideas that I find very reasonable, so I decided on sharing them here. This is no spam or commercial, just a very interesting group. This is mostly an american movement, which counters issues specifically in the US. Many of the policies stated under already exists in my homecountry Sweden and I've gotten the impression that they work here, so why don't give it a try?

The United Citizens of the World is a non-profit, grass roots political organisation, focusing on policies that make ordinary peoples lives better.

We think that a sensible, secular, science based, rational policy that transcends religion, capitalism and party politics and focuses on making life better for everyone is well overdue.

We are tired of governments and corporations putting profits before people,
We are tired of religion being imposed upon the non-religious,
And we are tired of tradition and personal opinion being put before reason and logic.

Our main policies:

Secularism
We believe:
-Totally in an individuals right to hold any belief they choose, express their opinion on that belief under freedom of speech and to privately practice that belief where it does not harm other individuals rights or impose upon their way of life.
-That belief of any sort should not have an automatic right to respect from others, other than the respect given to their right to hold that belief. Respect from others is earned, usually from open, evidence based debate.
-That the state and religion should be separate.
-That policies of government should not be primarily based upon any religious doctrine.

Political Reform
We believe that:
-Politics should be free from influence of money, religion and special interests.
-Politicians should not be under influence from big business.
-Big business and the state should be separated. This includes stopping corporations from funding politicians and political parties.
-Politics should not merely be a popularity contest.
-Politicians primary interest should be in the welfare of their citizens.
-Money should not be able to buy influence in government.
-All parties should have equal exposure for thier policies, allowing voters to make an informed decision.
-All voters should be given sufficient information on party policies to make an informed decision.
-All children should be given sufficient education on how the political system works.

Economic Reform
We believe that:
-The current economic model (corporate capitalism) is in need of reform.
-The current economic model causes inherent inequality, promotes a culture of greed and over consumption and places profit before people.
-The current economic model encourages personal greed, admiration of selfishness and the overimportance of fame for fame's sake.
-The current system can stifle innovation, for example through the practice of sitting on patents.
-The current system causes conflict of interest between the pursuit of profit and the rights and interests of individuals on an unacceptable scale.
-The economy should ensure decent standards of living even for the poorest in society.
-The economy should promote and reward innovation.
-Financial inequality in society should be reduced.
-The economy should recognise the value of people over that of profit.
-Businesses should provide good working standards for all employees. This includes allowing employees an acceptable amount of free time outside of normal working hours.
-Government should develop comprehensive strategies to deal with the economic impact of increased automation on employment and plan for a post-scarcity economic model.
-Success should be measured in increased gross standard of living and contentment rather than increased gross national product.

Copyright
We believe that:
-Current copyright law is outdated and unfit for use given the technological advancements of this century.
-Copyright law must move away from imposing artificial scarcity on commodities.
-Copyright law must acknowledge the great positive benefits of freely sharing information.

Drug reform
We believe:
-That the current 'War on Drugs' has caused great human suffering, has cost trillions of dollars, has not reduced harmful drug use and has encouraged large criminal cartels.
-That the current treatment of drug use as a criminal issue is non-effective, has driven the issue underground and has harmed many innocent people.
-That current drug scheduling is greatly disproportionate to the social or personal harm caused by individual drug types.
-We recognise that recreational drug use has always been, is and always will be, a part of human nature, such is the case with alcohol, tobacco and caffeine use.
-We recognise that responsible 'recreational drug use' and 'drug abuse' are two different phenomena and should be treated as such.
-That some recreational drugs such as cannabis should be legalised with restrictions similar to that of alcohol and tobacco.
-That drug policies should ensure safety for recreational drug users, promote sensible and responsible use and provide medical help for those with drug abuse problems.
-That drug abuse should be treated as a social health issue not a criminal issue.

Education
We believe that:
-Education should be free for all, including higher education.
-Everyone has a right to a basic education.
-Places for higher education be provided based on merit rather than ability to pay, social status or religious or political affiliation.
-Religious doctrine should not be taught as scientific opinion or fact.
-Religious belief should not be promoted in school.
-Funding for education and research is extremely important and essential to the continued prosperity of humanity.

Evidence based thinking
We believe that:
-Evidence based thinking holds great value and can benefit humanity greatly.
-Government policy should be formed through rational, evidence based discussion.

Healthcare
We believe that:
-Healthcare should be free to everyone, regardless of their ability to pay.
-Preventative measures such as vaccines, health awareness campaigns and school sports programmes are very important.
-Some conditions lack research into treatment because they do not present an opportunity to profit. This is unacceptable and provision needs to be made for this.
-Euthanasia should be legal and available in special cases such as terminal illness. In addition we believe that prolonging the life of someone in permanent serious mental and physical pain when they show a prolonged desire to die is tantamount to torture.

Welfare
We believe that:
-The unemployed have the right to a basic decent standard of living.
-That the unemployed have the right to assistance in finding a job.
-That current systems reduce incentive for employment as the average minimum wage salary is little above that of unemployment benefit.
-That the able unemployed should be encouraged to get work, not through punishing unemployment but through rewarding those that work.
-That work should be made attractive to the unemployed.
-That the unemployed have the right to assistance with training and development of skills with a view to employment.

Justice
We believe that:
-The justice system should work to prevent crime.
-The justice system should use prison only where other methods have failed.
-The prison system should focus on rehabilitation of prisoners over retribution to ensure that they lead positive, crime free lives once released.
-The prison environment should encourage positive activity from prisoners and discourage negative behaviour.
-Prisoners have the right to a basic but fair standard of living.
-Prisoners have the right to access education in prison.
-No person should be compelled in any criminal case to be a witness against himself.

Media
We believe that:
-The principle of free speech should be protected by law.
-A free press is a necessary requirement for a free society.
-The media should be free from government and corporate influence in what they report.
-Media monopolies can be harmful to society and to a free press.
-Variety and diversity in media is important and should be promoted.
-News reports should be factually correct and not intentionally misleading.
-Individuals have a right to personal privacy and that this should be protected by law.

Environment
We believe that:
-Preservation of the environment and genetic diversity is a responsibility of mankind.
-Protection of the environment from pollution and irresponsible exploitation is of paramount importance.
-All economic activity concerning exploitation of natural resources should aim to become entirely renewable where possible and do as little damage to the environment as possible.
-Transferring power production from non-renewable to renewable energy sources is an urgent necessity.

Und so weiter.
 
Seems like a leftwing wishlist in many aspects. Some things would be/are good, but many of the things listed are just vague wishes without substance. I'd like a corruptionfree world too but I don't believe it's in human nature, generally speaking, to create such a world. Also.. would this be some kind of global thing without national borders? Totally free movement through old borders seems like a natural continuance of the list. Nothing mentioned though..
 
Hmmm...

ucwnew.jpg


anonymous-logo-1.jpg
 
There's a couple of things I disagree with on that big list, but the vast majority I could and certainly would support.
 
-Totally in an individuals right to hold any belief they choose, express their opinion on that belief under freedom of speech and to privately practice that belief where it does not harm other individuals rights or impose upon their way of life.
Why couldn't they have just stopped there? Instead, they're pushing for a worldwide trampling of freedoms, not an expansion of them.
 
Actually, it's not the problem to post a wishlist, it's a problem how such wishlist work. For example, how can you afford to provide such a big public service without taxing the hell out of other industries?
 
Most of that is either 'great idea, which is why it already happens' or 'that would be lovely, but how do you propose implementing and paying for it?' Decent list though, even if there's one or two points on it with which I'd disagree
 
Hmmm...

Spoiler :
ucwnew.jpg


Spoiler :
anonymous-logo-1.jpg

Which are, more likely than not, both directly derived from this flag:

Spoiler :

500px-Flag_of_the_United_Nations.svg.png


I'm cool with most of what's on this list, from having read it diagonally. I'm also in agreement with amadeus's point though; the religion/secularism part of this list seemed quite hostile towards any involvement of religion within the public sector, which is a pretty extreme and in many societies infeasible solution that in my opinion causes more problems than it creates. Religion and spirituality is a big deal to many people, and I don't get what the issue is with politicians and other influential people inspiring themselves by their religious convictions. It can't get too gargantuan anyway, considering that any attempt to reduce or eradicate someone else's religious rights is per definition impossible within the quoted clause.
 
Why couldn't they have just stopped there? Instead, they're pushing for a worldwide trampling of freedoms, not an expansion of them.

Restricted freedom is very often greater freedom. As someone who considers himself a classical liberal I'm very surprised that you aren't intimately familiar with this prime teaching of Locke's.
 
I completely agree, except for the part about copyright laws. They should have stressed the evil of patent laws more while still allowing for intellectual property to be protected.

I especially agree with the part which Amadeus apparently takes exception. Freedom of religion does not mean you should have the right to inflict your own religious beliefs on others. That is completely contrary to the notion of a free secular society.
 
A bit of the list is good, but it will never happen. Too much hatred in division in the world between people of different ethnic groups. Good list though.
 
Sounds good to me.
 
Ironic, right?
"It is true that liberty is precious — so precious that it must be rationed."

Attributed to Lenin in a book by Sidney and Beatrice Webb (Soviet Communism: A New Civilization?)

And I'm not using Leninist as an epithet against him; he is indeed a Leninist.

Or are you seriously saying that civil rights legislation is against freedom?
It depends on what you mean by civil rights legislation.
 
Top Bottom