1. We have added the ability to collapse/expand forum categories and widgets on forum home.
    Dismiss Notice
  2. All Civ avatars are brought back and available for selection in the Avatar Gallery! There are 945 avatars total.
    Dismiss Notice
  3. To make the site more secure, we have installed SSL certificates and enabled HTTPS for both the main site and forums.
    Dismiss Notice
  4. Civ6 is released! Order now! (Amazon US | Amazon UK | Amazon CA | Amazon DE | Amazon FR)
    Dismiss Notice
  5. Dismiss Notice
  6. Forum account upgrades are available for ad-free browsing.
    Dismiss Notice

Upgrade subs?

Discussion in 'Civ3 - General Discussions' started by Ozymandous, Aug 21, 2003.

  1. Ozymandous

    Ozymandous Chieftain

    Joined:
    Jul 31, 2001
    Messages:
    474
    Location:
    Atlanta, GA, USA
    Can sub's be upgraded to a higher attack power due to their "stealth" underwater ability?

    Ships that can't see the sub's should either: 1) suffer a 50% reduction to their defense, or 2) the sub's attack power should double, whichever would be easier to balance.

    Right now subs, especially nuclear sub's, are VASTLY under-powered when an ironclad can sink one. :rolleyes:

    Even a WW2 or modern era battleship, without sonar or other means to detect a sub as modelled in the game, should be a siting duck to an enemy or friendly sub, and this is not the case.

    I know sub's can be modded to be more powerful, but that would miss the point of their being stealthy and 'hidden' in the first place which SHOULD give a huge bonus in combat because they can attack when the enemy is unprepared. Against a ship that can see them sub's are easy prey but against those that can't, they rule and this can only be shown by modding the "stealth" ability some way.
     
  2. fitchn

    fitchn Civ Fanatic

    Joined:
    Jun 27, 2003
    Messages:
    332
    Location:
    Delaware (USA)
    Perhaps a sub should get a single 'free' shot at the enemy when attacking or being attacked. Combat would ensue as normal, but if the sub 'loses' the first (and only the first) attack shot, it does not lose a hit point. This could be set up for other units as well, including other stealth units or ranged units. Ideally, this would be set up with a flag in the editor, so that it could easily be set for any desired units.
     
  3. solid b

    solid b Chieftain

    Joined:
    Aug 3, 2003
    Messages:
    26
    Location:
    D
    what happened to bombard (torpedos)?
     
  4. tctatheel7

    tctatheel7 Running Silent, and Deep

    Joined:
    Jun 4, 2002
    Messages:
    266
    Location:
    NC, USA
    this sounds like the way subs attack in axis and allies. do you play that game?
     
  5. fitchn

    fitchn Civ Fanatic

    Joined:
    Jun 27, 2003
    Messages:
    332
    Location:
    Delaware (USA)
    Nope, never played it. This idea just kind of struck me as being fairly logical and somewhat obvious.

    Perhaps the ability should be called something to the extent of 'first strike.' I also think that this ability should be given to any ranged units fighting non-ranged units, to represent the ranged units ability to attack the non-ranged unit while it approaches (ie, bowman vs. legionare).
     
  6. toh6wy

    toh6wy Chieftain

    Joined:
    Aug 20, 2003
    Messages:
    1,403
    Location:
    Omnipresent
    @ fitchn: Great idea for ranged vs. non-ranged, but IMO it's not good for subs. I think that an extra ability, "x2 vs. non-detect-invisible units" in addition to stealth should be given to the sub.
     
  7. Granite88

    Granite88 Chieftain

    Joined:
    Dec 19, 2002
    Messages:
    72
    Location:
    Auburn, Alabama
    I agree with toh6wy, giving subs a x2 against non-invisible units would be like the defensive bonus to certain types of terrain, so I think it would be easier to implement. Also, destroyers..... What's the deal with them and the aegis cruisers?!? Destroyers were specifically ASW ships (ie. depth charges) and aegis cruisers specialize AA and AM operations. So the ability for the aegis ships to see submarines but having destroyers blind to them seems kind of strange.... Maybe give the cruisers an advantage against aircraft so as to help support carriers?
     
  8. tctatheel7

    tctatheel7 Running Silent, and Deep

    Joined:
    Jun 4, 2002
    Messages:
    266
    Location:
    NC, USA
    granite's right, firaxis has things mixed up with the destroyers and aegis cruisers, which suprises me, since it was correct in Civ 2 (wasn't it?).
     
  9. Louis XXIV

    Louis XXIV Le Roi Soleil

    Joined:
    Mar 12, 2003
    Messages:
    13,578
    Location:
    Norfolk, VA
    In Civ2, Cruisers, Destroyers, and AEGIS Cruisers all could see subs. AEGIS Cruisers had double defense against air, as well.

    They mentioned that there will be battle mutiplyers, but I wonder about some kind of "Unit AA Gun"
     
  10. Ozymandous

    Ozymandous Chieftain

    Joined:
    Jul 31, 2001
    Messages:
    474
    Location:
    Atlanta, GA, USA
    toh6wy had the idea I was looking for with his 2X multiplier against non-detect targets. This would be the exact thing needed to make the subs useful as something other than a roadblock or early warning system (which is not really what they are good for at all.)

    If subs are meant more like a underwater scout then they need to be able to see something like 5 squares all around to model the SOUSSA (?) system employed by the US Navy where they can tell where a ship is going via underwater microphones.
     
  11. skywalker

    skywalker Waffle

    Joined:
    Oct 3, 2001
    Messages:
    317
    Location:
    Virginia
    I think the stealth attack ability is good enough.
     

Share This Page