v1.185
- Thread starter Rhye
- Start date
blizzrd
Micromanager
gems need to be added to India, (see image, one on far left)
The Gems in Australia are currently in the wrong location (Kimberley, north western WA). They should be moved to South Australia onto the tile above the Uranium, to represent the Coober Pedy/Andamooka opal fields which provide 95% of the world's opals used for jewellery.
blizzrd
Micromanager
Playing as Persia, I've noticed that vassal's no longer seem to count towards the 8% goal for the UHV whereas they used to in fact count towards that goal.
In my most recent Persian game, I controlled 9.62 % of the world land area according to the victory screen yet did not meet the 8% requirement for some reason (vassals I guess). My empire encompassed Byzantion, Sinope, Artaxata, Babylon, Susa, Jerusalem, Persepolis (shiraz), Artacoana, Samarkand, Pasargadae (2n,1e of Samarkand), and Delhi with India (2 cities with lots of culture) and China (!!!!) 5 cities with lots of culture as my vassals yet did not meet the requirement.
In a previous patch I've had Egypt (3 or 4 cities) and Ethiopia (2-3 cities) as vassals and only a little over 7% under direct Persian (mesopotamia, India, Anatolia, Samarkand) control and gotten the UHV condition.
Did I miss a change somewhere? Is this intentional? A bug?
In my most recent Persian game, I controlled 9.62 % of the world land area according to the victory screen yet did not meet the 8% requirement for some reason (vassals I guess). My empire encompassed Byzantion, Sinope, Artaxata, Babylon, Susa, Jerusalem, Persepolis (shiraz), Artacoana, Samarkand, Pasargadae (2n,1e of Samarkand), and Delhi with India (2 cities with lots of culture) and China (!!!!) 5 cities with lots of culture as my vassals yet did not meet the requirement.
In a previous patch I've had Egypt (3 or 4 cities) and Ethiopia (2-3 cities) as vassals and only a little over 7% under direct Persian (mesopotamia, India, Anatolia, Samarkand) control and gotten the UHV condition.
Did I miss a change somewhere? Is this intentional? A bug?
Walliard
WW007D?
Are you sure? I remember hearing that it never counted under previous patches; Rhye only recently (1.184, I believe) changed it so that the victory screen wouldn't display it as such.
Rhye
's and Fall creator
yea I tweaked the victory screen to show percentage distinctively
Please change Malisese UHV #1. In 3000BC it is possible, but in 600AD there is usually someone with more than 2600 gold in 1300AD. 2630 is the best I could get with Wagadugu + Melilla + Tunis(Carthage) even with the WASP mod. Could we change to: have the most gold or 2000+ gold in 1300?
Rhye
's and Fall creator
already done something for this.
In the latest patch the conquerors can only be triggered after 1300AD, which is 10 turns after the Aztecs spawn. This is the conquerors for all of the new world civs. If you meet any of them after 600AD and before or in 1300AD, the conquerors event can never be triggered for that civ. If you meet a new world civ before 600AD, you don't get conquerors but it won't disable them. Also, they can't be triggered after 1800AD.
Similar threads
