Vote: Safe Food and Drug Act

[Head Serf]

VOTING IS NOW CLOSED

Safe Food and Drug Act

Section 1
1. It shall be illegal for any person to sell a drug or food that is dangerous without proper warning documentation on the product that said product is dangerous.
2. It shall be illegal for drug or food sellers to alter or remove warnings issued by a producer or the government, without government or producer approval.

Section 2
1. It is prohibited to import or to export any good which is dangerous and does not contain proper warning documentation.
2. Section 2 only pertains to goods on Civilitas land; goods being transported across Civilitas ocean do not need to be inspected.

Section 3
1. The Civilitas federal government must allow for the needed amount of money to be provided in order to insure that all manufacturers, importers, and exporters, are inspected once randomly during the year.
2. Inspections will be done by individuals trained in food safety procedures and will report to officials in the Finance and Business Administration who will report their findings directly to the courts where the wrongdoer will then be put through the due process of law.

Section 4
1. The term drug shall be recognized as all medicine and chemical preparations for internal or external use, and any substance or mixture of substances intended to be used for the cure, mitigation, or prevention of disease for either people or other animals. The term food shall include all articles used for food, drink, confectionery, or condiment by people or animals, whether simple, mixed, or compound.

Created by: Head Serf
Endorsed by: sirdanilot, bigdog5994

 

[Splime]

Yees.Yees.

 

[Leif]

I vote yes.

 

[The Ninja]

Votink Da on this bill.

The Ninja

 

[Samuelson]

I vote yes.

 

[LucyDuke]

Sections one and two are common sense and just fine. Section three is ambiguous, and section four is poorly thought out and incomplete.

So nay.

 

[Red Door]

I vote YEA.

 

[Equuleus]

I vote YES.

 

[LightFang]

Register a vote thusly: YEA.

 

[Provolution]

I vote YEs

 

[jeps]

MP J_Eps of Karmel-Bucht votes Ja

 

[Red Door]

People, please vote YEA or NAY, YES or NO is acceptable, but Ja, Da, etc. are not. We're trying to be serious, this kind of stuff isn't serious.

 

[jeps]

actually, Red Door, it was stated that German, Italian, Dutch, Russian, English, and other universally known languages are fine.

If I were to vote Ken/Lo it would not be (hebrew), or Hai/Iie. However, Da, Ja, Nyet, Nein, Si, No, Yes, Oui, Non, etc. are all good.

 

[Red Door]

actually, Red Door, it was stated that German, Italian, Dutch, Russian, English, and other universally known languages are fine.

If I were to vote Ken/Lo it would not be (hebrew), or Hai/Iie. However, Da, Ja, Nyet, Nein, Si, No, Yes, Oui, Non, etc. are all good.

That's really stupid, how are people supposed to tell what you're voting. Keep it simple, keep in parliamentary procedure.

 

[LightFang]

Meh, I still think all votes should be done with YEA or NAY. Kind of ruins the atmosphere or something. Although YES and NO are okay.

But once we start moving onto other languages...はい/いいえ, for example, is not okay.

 

[Head Serf]

VOTES

Yes: 9
No: 1

 

[dimaliok]

DA is my vote

 

[Love]

Jag röstar FÖR!

 

[ArneHD]

My vote is cast yes.

 

[sirdanilot]

You didn't ammend the bill into animals and people, like I suggested.

I can't possibly endorse a bill like this. I vote no for now.

If you ammend the bill per the suggestions in the discussion thread I will vote yes of course.