[RD] War in Gaza News: Pas de Deux

'I had to bulldoze my house' - Palestinians face spike in Israeli demolition orders in East Jerusalem​

Walking through the ruins of what used to be his home, 29-year-old Ahmad Musa al-Qumbar always feared the Jerusalem city authorities would come after him. The married Palestinian father-of-four built the modest single-storey building seven years ago, on land he owns and where his family have lived for generations.
But Ahmad never actually had a legal permit to build.
He lives in the Jabal Mukaber district of East Jerusalem. Within sight of the Old City and its many historic religious monuments, it is one of the most densely populated and fiercely contested parts of the region. It was captured by Israel from Jordan in the 1967 Middle East war, and later annexed, but is widely regarded internationally as Palestinian territory.
Control of Jerusalem is one of the most contentious issues of the decades-old conflict. Palestinians officially claim East Jerusalem as their capital, while Israel considers the whole of the city as its capital.
“Who” is allowed to build “where” in the city is a big part of that battle.

The rate at which Palestinian homes are being demolished in occupied East Jerusalem has almost doubled since the start of the conflict in Gaza, say human rights groups and monitoring organisations. The demolitions are ordered by the Israeli-run municipal authority which says that many buildings, like Ahmad’s, are illegally built without permission.
One NGO, Ir Amim, says that “under the cover of war”, Israel is “forcibly displacing Palestinians from their homes and the city”.
“I had to demolish my house after I was hit with penalties by the police and the Israeli courts,” Ahmad tells me as he stands in the rubble of what used to be his kitchen.
“I couldn’t pay the fines and risk losing things like healthcare and my child insurance. Of course, we appealed to the court, but they refused.”
Like many in the same situation, Ahmad reluctantly hired heavy machinery to knock down the house himself. He said that the Jerusalem City authorities would have charged him the equivalent of $100,000 (£75,600) if they’d carried out the order.
It made the job perhaps even more painful - tearing down his family’s labours and his children’s future with his own hands.

Almost all attempts by Palestinian families in East Jerusalem to apply for planning permission are rejected by the Israeli authorities. That means growing families say they have no choice but to build illegally and face the potential consequences – huge fines and demolition orders.
Some say the law and the courts are being deliberately used to suppress Palestinian growth and ambitions.
“These Palestinian communities ask for permission, and between 95% to 99% of the requests are denied,” says Shay Parnes, spokesperson for the Israeli human rights organisation B’Tselem.
“It has been happening for years,” continues Parnes.
“Sometimes they use security reasons to justify it, but it’s always under the same framework of expelling Palestinians... because the law is different for different communities who live side by side in the same city.”

On the predominantly Jewish Western side of the city, what used to be a skyline of relatively low, white-stone buildings has changed dramatically in recent years. Construction is booming. Cranes operate virtually 24/7 with new high-rise buildings, both residential and commercial, growing tall as that side of Jerusalem expands.
There’s been frenetic construction, too, in some areas of East Jerusalem where land has been claimed by Israel to make way for Jewish settlements. In Har Homa, an estimated 25,000 people now live in brand new homes on land formally expropriated by Israel in 1991.

Just across the road are the Palestinian villages of Umm Tuba and Sur Baher, where many public facilities are notably inferior to those in Har Homa.
In stark contrast to the building work on the other side of the highway, several homes have been forcibly demolished here in recent years in what Amnesty International describes as “a flagrant violation of international law and part of a systematic pattern by the Israeli authorities to forcibly displace Palestinians”.
It's a similar picture in the settlement of Gilo, expanding rapidly in what is internationally regarded as occupied East Jerusalem, while, it’s argued, neighbouring Palestinian suburbs are denied the ability to grow at anything like the same rate.
The international community considers Israeli settlements in East Jerusalem illegal under international law, but the Israeli government disputes this. Israel also denies that demolitions are part of deliberate policy of discrimination that has gathered pace under the cover of the distraction of the Gaza war.
In a statement, the Jerusalem Municipality said the accusations were “absolutely false” and that it had local support for “comprehensive building and construction plans across nearly all areas of East Jerusalem”.
The plans “aim to provide options for neighbourhood expansion, address the widespread issue of illegal construction, and designate areas for the construction of municipal service structures,” it added.
But it isn’t hard to find examples where Israeli demolition orders against Palestinian homes are being enforced across East Jerusalem.

In the suburb of Silwan, just below the Old City, we found another Palestinian home in ruins. Lutfiyah al-Wahidi says the annexe had been built for her son’s family more than a decade ago but eventually the authorities came calling.
“Even if we build just one brick, the authorities come and demolish it. How did our house harm them? It’s on land that I doubt the authorities will ever be interested in.”
The grandmother says she has paid thousands of dollars in court fines over the years in a vain attempt to keep the property.
“My son has a family of six with only one provider. What harm are they doing, yet they still want to demolish it,” she says, her wider family now dispersed to other parts of the city.

In a comprehensive policy brief, Ir Amim found that since the outbreak of the Gaza war on 7 October 2023, “there has been a major acceleration in the promotion and fast-tracking of new settlement plans in East Jerusalem and a dramatic spike in the rate of demolitions of Palestinian homes".
"The Israeli government is clearly exploiting the war to create more facts on the ground,” it continues.
There are estimated to be at least 20,000 outstanding demolition orders in East Jerusalem – orders which have no expiry limit.
Many commentators have also observed that since 7 October, far-right members of Benjamin Netanyahu’s government and in the Jerusalem Municipality have become more confident in publicly expressing their intent to see more Jewish homes built on occupied or contested land.
While Palestinians, like Ahmad’s and Lutfiyah’s families, become noticeably more afraid of losing their homes, they insist they will stay and eventually rebuild their lives here in East Jerusalem.
https://www.bbc.com/news/articles/c0lwpg9xrxdo
 
Overkill?

US says B-2 stealth bombers struck hidden Houthi weapons, sending a message to foes that nothing is out of reach​

The US military hit Houthi targets in Yemen with multiple "precision strikes," the Pentagon announced late Wednesday evening.

US forces struck five hardened underground weapons-storage sites that the Iran-backed Houthis had used to fuel their attacks against merchant shipping vessels in the region, the secretary of defense, Lloyd Austin, said in a statement.

The operation involved US Navy and US Air Force assets, including B-2 Spirit long-range stealth bombers. The operation marks the first known deployment of this strike capability in the US counter-Houthi campaign.

The US military has relied heavily on the warships and fighter aircraft it has stationed in the region to carry out operations against the Houthis. The B-2, however, can travel long distances and carry heavier payloads than the American jets.

The Department of Defense indicated that the B-2s sent a message to the Houthis and other US foes, such as Iran, which has armed and supported the rebels. Austin said that "this was a unique demonstration of the United States' ability to target facilities that our adversaries seek to keep out of reach, no matter how deeply buried underground, hardened, or fortified."

He said the B-2 employment demonstrated America's "global strike capabilities to take action against these targets when necessary, anytime, anywhere."

Over the past year, the Houthis have regularly used missiles and drones to target important merchant shipping lanes in the Red Sea and Gulf of Aden, hitting several vessels. American and European forces operating in the region have routinely shot down these threats.

US Central Command said Wednesday that its forces targeted hardened underground facilities where the Houthis stored missiles, weapons components, and other munitions that they used to carry out their attacks on military and civilian vessels in the region.

"Our battle damage assessments are underway and do not indicate civilian casualties. We will provide updates as information is confirmed," the command said in a statement.

The strikes on Wednesday — early Thursday local time — mark the latest US bombardment of Houthi targets in Yemen. American forces targeted the rebels earlier this month.

The bombing of the Houthis has also come as the Middle East remains on edge over expected Israeli retaliation against Iran following Tehran's October 1 ballistic-missile attack. Following the attack, the US deployed an advanced air-defense battery to Israel.
 
And all it took was tens of thousands (confirmed) to hundreds of thousands (estimatee) of civilian casualties and numerous war crimes. It's going to be a dark day when other powers in the region adjust their strategies accordingly.
 
Always interesting to see how it's framed as Israel responding, as though Iran's missile attack came out of nowhere and wasn't caused by rampant Israeli aggression and / or extrajudicial murder.

If Israel struck Iran it's justified. As it is they're sticking their noses in someone else's business.

They can do that of course realpoltik and all that but the consequences are also on them.
 
@Broken_Erika
No alternative there.
The withdrawal of 2005 did not end particularly well.

People kinda forget this. They pulled out and got hit with missiles.

When one side doesn't recognize your right to exist.......

Also a contributing factor to reactionary Israeli governments. If you're gonna get attacked regardless may as well vote for said reactionaries.

We did worse to zero Germans in WW2. HAMA's isn't exactly a normal government you can negotiate with.

Military occupation and dismantling of HAMAs state might be best Palestinians can hope for. Our best offer is unconditional surrender.

HAMAs leadership didn't launch Oct7 with any realistic chance of a conventional win. It's either a PR move or catastrophic under estimation of the consequences.
 
Last edited:
If Israel struck Iran it's justified.
Israel did indeed strike Iran.
When one side doesn't recognize your right to exist.......
This also applies to Israel not respecting anyone elses' right to exist. Everything you said about voting for reactionaries applies to the countries Israel is bombing into the dirt (with Western bombs and associated weaponry). Israel is creating a whole new generation of enemies, and demonstrating that international law doesn't apply when they don't want it to.

But I already covered this with Yeekim (I think) in the past handful of pages.

As it is, the news speaks for itself.
 
Israel did indeed strike Iran.

This also applies to Israel not respecting anyone elses' right to exist. Everything you said about voting for reactionaries applies to the countries Israel is bombing into the dirt (with Western bombs and associated weaponry).

But I already covered this with Yeekim (I think) in the past handful of pages.

As it is, the news speaks for itself.

They struck Iranian proxies. If any Iranians were killed I'm sure they were just in Syria for holiday's. Bad Israel.
 
They struck Iranian proxies. If any Iranians were killed I'm sure they were just in Syria for holiday's. Bad Israel.
So you support attacking embassies assuming the attacking country considers it an acceptable target?

Is this something that all parties involved can benefit from, or is it just something Israel gets to do?
 
So you support attacking embassies assuming the attacking country considers it an acceptable target?

Is this something that all parties involved can benefit from, or is it just something Israel gets to do?

If thise embassies are directly aiding extra national groups while at war then yes.

Iran's not exactly an innocent party here. They're also voluntarily choosing to get involved no one's forcing them.

Their goal is basically to destabilize the area for their own geopolitical goals. Iraq, Syria, Lebanon and anyone vs the Saudis.
They're not humanitarian. Israel is no direct threat to the Iranian state assuming they didn't choose to get involved.
 
Last edited:
If thise embassies are directly aiding extra national groups while at war then yes.
That's a long answer to say "no, I only support Israel doing it". Appreciate you stating it outright, or as close to as anyone is going to get.
 
That's a long answer to say "no, I only support Israel doing it". Appreciate you stating it outright, or as close to as anyone is going to get.

Counter argument is by what right Iran has to arm those groups?

Live by the sword.......

What direct threat would Israel be to Iran if they sat there doing nothing?
 
What direct threat would Israel be to Iran if they sat there doing nothing?
Israel are a Western-backed modern nation, armed to the teeth with a history of treating Arabs very, very poorly. I'd say "a very direct threat".

What you're saying isn't a counterargument. If anything, it proves my point. If you can justify anything Israel does by pointing at actions done by others, Israel has done many similar or even worse actions itself.

International law should apply to all, or it should apply to none. We can't say "Iran are bad because they flout it" and then make excuses for Israel also flouting it. Or rather, we shouldn't, but folks try anyway. It's the epitome of double standards.
 
Israel are a Western-backed modern nation, armed to the teeth with a history of treating Arabs very, very poorly. I'd say "a very direct threat".

What you're saying isn't a counterargument. If anything, it proves my point. If you can justify anything Israel does by pointing at actions done by others, Israel has done many similar or even worse actions itself.

International law should apply to all, or it should apply to none. We can't say "Iran are bad because they flout it" and then make excuses for Israel also flouting it. Or rather, we shouldn't, but folks try anyway. It's the epitome of double standards.

I arguing realpolit8js. Hamas started a war they had no chance of winning in the conventional sense.

Iran's been stirring the pot for decades. There not doing it for humanitarian reasons.

So by getting involved they're making themselves a target. Not even you are gonna bother arguing they're not involved.

For a self confessed left wing liberal you go remarkably easy on an authoritarian ultra conservative theocracy. One of 2 theocratic on the planet.

Israel has a crappy government as well. Of course Hanas wants a Ceasefire they only observe them when convenient. Anyone with half a brain knows they're gonna fire rockets at Israel in the near future regardless of the composition of said government.

Israel for all it's numerous flaws knows this. Anyone who has paid attention for the last 20 years knows this. Hell you know this you just justify it.
 
Moderator Action: This ends here. Back to news now. -lymond
 
Technically it is Israel occupying Egyptian land, but somewhere along the way, that simply got re-cast as Israel occupying Palestine.
Could you elaborate on this? I could have sworn Egypt relinquished all claim to territory beyond the Sinai when they made peace with Israel.
 
Top Bottom