Washington D.C. and Mexico City legalize same-sex marriage and adoption,

Karalysia

Deity
Joined
May 29, 2009
Messages
8,438
(CNN) -- Mexico City, one of Latin America's largest metropolises, on Monday legalized same-sex marriage and adoption by same-sex couples.

By a vote of 39 to 20, the city's legislative assembly approved revisions to the civil code to permit same-sex marriages. Five legislators abstained.
In a separate motion, the assembly voted 31 to 24 in favor of legalizing adoption by same-sex couples, with nine abstentions.

The revision will change the definition of marriage to a union between two people, instead of the current version, which specifies a union between a man and a woman.
Civil groups in favor and opposed to the vote had gathered since early in the morning outside the legislative building.

In 2007, the legislators approved same-sex civil unions.
Mexico City is the second major Latin American city to legalize same-sex marriage.
In November, a Buenos Aires, Argentina, court legalized same-sex marriages. The first marriage to be held under the new law, however, was delayed over legal wrangling in the courts.

http://www.cnn.com/2009/WORLD/americas/12/21/mexico.gay.marriage/index.html

America is quickly becoming a disgrace. The deeply Catholic and devout Mexico is making more progress on gay marriage than we are. Mexico and Argentina are ahead of us.


Though D.C. also legalized it,
Washington (CNN) -- The nation's capital city took a major step Friday toward legalizing same-sex marriage.
District of Columbia Mayor Adrian Fenty signed a measure recognizing such marriages as legal. The district council overwhelming passed the bill Tuesday, following a similar vote December 1.

Fenty signed the measure at All Souls Church, a Unitarian Universalist house of worship in the northwest part of the district that is known for its diversity and for the welcoming of same-sex couples.

The measure now goes to Congress for a 30-day review period, but it's considered unlikely that the Democratic majority on Capitol Hill would block the bill. By law, Congress has the right to review and overturn laws created by the District of Columbia's council.

If the measure becomes law, the district will join Massachusetts, Connecticut, Vermont and Iowa in legalizing same-sex marriages. A law legalizing such marriages in New Hampshire takes effect January 1.

Earlier this year, lawmakers in Maine approved a measure legalizing same-sex marriages, but voters in the state last month passed a referendum to overturn the new law. Last week, New York's state Senate defeated a bill that would legalize such marriages. A similar bill stalled last week in New Jersey's state Senate.
Friday's signing ceremony prompted approval from gay rights groups. The Human Rights Campaign called it "an important and historic step towards equal dignity, equal respect and equal rights for same-sex couples."
The measure "reinforces the legal equality and religious freedoms to which all D.C. residents are entitled," the organization's president, Joe Solmonese, said in a written statement.

The National Organization for Marriage, which opposes same-sex marriage, promised earlier in the week that "the fight is not over."
"Politicians on the city council are acting as if they have the right through legislation to deprive citizens of D.C. of their core civil right to vote, but we will not let them get away with it," said Brian Brown, the organization's executive director.
"We will go to Congress, we will go to the courts, we will fight for the people's right to vote," he said.

Opposition to the legislation also came from the Catholic Church's Archdiocese of Washington, which has said that the measure could restrict the church's ability to provide charity services, apparently because the church might cut back on services rather than comply with the measure's requirements.

http://www.cnn.com/2009/POLITICS/12/18/same.sex.marriage/index.html#cnnSTCText

I celebrate the triumph of the mysterious gay agenda. Take that NOM.
 
Meh, Mexico's behind in terms of total acceptance of gay marriage actually. Although why the hell America is behind South Africa and Mexico City in human rights is something that keeps me up at night.

Whatever happened to USA #1?
 
Usa #5 :(

You have to take into account Mexico City's massive population. New York and LA combined. It's like 10-12 million people. Thats a substantial chunk. Also Mexico has other states where its legalized.

800px-State_recognition_of_same-sex_relationships_%28Mexico%29.png


Blue is legalized
Yellow is where the issue is being considered
Red is where it is banned outright

Compare with US, we have more states with it legalized, but a lot lot more where its banned.

498px-State_recognition_of_same-sex_relationships_%28Northern_America%29.svg.png
 
New England used to be so blue...

This is good news for the LGBT communities especially since the recent set backs in New York and New Jersey(?).

I wonder how influential the decisions of Mexico City is? Perhaps other states in Mexico will follow through too.
 
http://www.guardian.co.uk/world/2009/dec/22/mexico-city-same-sex-marriage
Mexico City has become the first city in Latin America to legalise same-sex marriage, giving gay couples more rights, including allowing them to adopt children.

The bill passed the capital's local assembly by 39 votes to 20 yesterday as supporters chanted: "Yes, we could! Yes, we could!"

The city's leftwing mayor, Marcelo Ebrard, of the Democratic Revolution party, had been widely expected to sign the measure into law.

The assembly has made several decisions that have been unpopular elsewhere in the deeply Roman Catholic country, including legalising abortion in the first 12 weeks of pregnancy.

That sparked a backlash, with the majority of Mexico's other 32 states enacting legislation declaring that life begins at conception.

The conservative National Action party, led by the Mexican president, Felipe Calderón, vowed to challenge the new gay marriage law in the courts.

However, homosexuality is increasingly accepted in Mexico, with gay couples holding hands in parts of the capital and the annual gay pride parade attracting tens of thousands of people.

The bill called for a change of the definition of marriage in the city's civil code.

It is currently defined as the union of a man and a woman, and the new definition will be "the free uniting of two people".

The change will enable same-sex couples to adopt, apply for bank loans, inherit wealth and be included in the insurance policies of their spouse – rights they were denied under the civil unions allowed in the city.

"We are so happy," said Temistocles Villanueva, a 23-year-old film student, who celebrated the new legislation by kissing his boyfriend outside the city assembly.

"For centuries, unjust laws banned marriage between blacks and whites or Indians and Europeans," Victor Romo, of the Democratic Revolution party, said. "Today, all barriers have disappeared."

However, Armando Martinez, the president of the College of Catholic Attorneys, said politicians in the city had "given Mexicans the most bitter Christmas".

"They are permitting adoption [by gay couples], and in one stroke of the pen have erased the terms mother and father," he said.

Only seven countries – Canada, Spain, South Africa, Sweden, Norway, the Netherlands and Belgium – allow gay marriages.

The Argentinian capital, Buenos Aires, became the first Latin American city to legalise same-sex civil unions for gay and lesbian couples in 2002.

Four other Argentine cities later did the same, as did Mexico City in 2007 and some Mexican and Brazilian states. Only Uruguay has legalised civil unions nationwide.

Buenos Aires officials introduced a bill for legalising gay marriage in the national congress in October, but it stalled without a vote and officials blocked same-sex weddings because of conflicting judicial rulings.

Many people in Mexico and elsewhere in Latin America remain opposed to gay marriage, and the Roman Catholic church has announced its opposition.
Sooo, after recent setbacks in Maine, New York, New Jersey, it seems the ball (of gay marriage) is rolling once again! :D Any guesses on the next capital city to get fabulous?
 
That map is wrong. California is red now :cry:
 
I approve using red and blue as the colors. :lol:
 
I predict major earthquake to hit Mexico City next year, together with a category 5 hurricane, a new strain of swine flu and some kind of a volcanic eruption.

Look at what happened to the Philippines :mischief:
 
Wait, the Philippines legalized gay marriage? If so, that would be, that would be just hilarious (I know it's totally evil, but that's the way someone from the opposition would look at it).
 
That's just God being omniscient. Actually, now that I think about it, I'm pretty sure that all natural disasters are God's punishment for that region legalizing gay marriage sometime in the future.
 
Mexico city? I'm pleasantly surprised - I'd have thought that they are all catholic and anti-gay over there in Mexico land.

Major cities tend to be significantly less socially conservative than their rural surroundings.
 
We should ship them some fundamentalist Christian missionaries to bring them "western culture" and "civilization".
 
Yay for DC. They're a very liberal place so this isn't very much unexpected.

I'm still waiting for Nepal though. They committed to it by 2010 and it still hasn't happened.
 
It seems, as always, I have some exceptionally unconventional opinions.

I don't care whether or not gays can marry and marriage certainly isn't a right. I certainly wouldn't be ashamed just because I live somewhere that does not allow gay marriage. However not allowing gay couples to adopt is just horrible. You are denying the ability of kids to have a loving family just because you don't agree with their lifestyle? That's just wrong.
 
Top Bottom