What do you prefer ?

Discussion in 'CivBE - General Discussions' started by Lachlan, Apr 15, 2014.

?

What do you want ?

Poll closed Jul 14, 2014.
  1. Civ Beyond Earth

    87 vote(s)
    71.9%
  2. New official stuff for Civ 5

    16 vote(s)
    13.2%
  3. Other

    18 vote(s)
    14.9%
Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.
  1. Lachlan

    Lachlan Great Builder of Civs !

    Joined:
    Mar 27, 2002
    Messages:
    2,072
    Location:
    European Union
    Civ Beyond Earth

    A third Expansion for Civ 5
     
  2. stealth_nsk

    stealth_nsk Deity

    Joined:
    Nov 28, 2005
    Messages:
    5,514
    Gender:
    Male
    Location:
    Novosibirsk, Russia
    CBE of course. Each expansion for Civ 5 makes a mess with the new features. Third one would be a little too much. We already have several types of trade, 3 classes of Great People and so on...
     
  3. Arrowstorm

    Arrowstorm Chieftain

    Joined:
    Jun 29, 2013
    Messages:
    80
    Location:
    Denmark
    With BNW, Civ V is amazing, and I don't feel like there's a need for a third expansion. I'd rather they just worked on Civ VI instead of messing with perfection.

    A new AC would be awesome.
     
  4. Lord Tirian

    Lord Tirian Erratic Poster

    Joined:
    Nov 30, 2007
    Messages:
    2,724
    Location:
    Liverpool, UK
    Realistically: Civilization: Beyond Earth. It's an exciting title, I want it to be as good as possible, Civ5 is in a good spot and will last me a while.

    Dreamland: Both. Though Civ5 is in a good spot, I'd love a DLC, a half-expansion, so to speak, that doesn't necessarily introduces full subsystems (like religion or ideologies), but rounds out a few things. Espionage could be a bit more involved. Port C:BE touted AI improvements to Civ5. Add some scenarios and perhaps a handful of (optional) future units, buildings and technologies as "lead-in" to C:BE. Fix some of the undervalued units, policies etc.
     
  5. Teodosio

    Teodosio Warlord

    Joined:
    Mar 3, 2002
    Messages:
    292
    Civilization V is a great game but it is now about four year old. It is pointless to keep patching it up forever. A new game is needed, where new mechanics and gameplay are explored. CivBE is going to be that and I really hope it will turn out as a better game.
     
  6. Ashbery76

    Ashbery76 Warlord

    Joined:
    Apr 21, 2002
    Messages:
    221
    Location:
    England
    Civ needs a break.Civ5 is still good,fresh and is very popular.
     
  7. Louis XXIV

    Louis XXIV Le Roi Soleil

    Joined:
    Mar 12, 2003
    Messages:
    13,579
    Location:
    Norfolk, VA
    Yeah, if I had to choose, that's what I'd choose, but I wouldn't mind more DLC for Civ5 going at the same time. The art department is unfortunately too busy right now to justify it, though.
     
  8. Silverman6083

    Silverman6083 History-Lover

    Joined:
    Jul 30, 2013
    Messages:
    669
    Location:
    Earth
    Well I am probably gonna get hate from this...but I'd like to see some more or a new XCOM because that was a great game(even though it is remarkably unforgiving), & recently they have been putting a lot of effort on Civ. Since these are set up to make quite a bit of money for at least a decade, I think they should focus on a different title. But hey, more civ is fine by me :)
     
  9. blackcatatonic

    blackcatatonic Queen of Meme

    Joined:
    Feb 14, 2012
    Messages:
    3,423
    Gender:
    Female
    Location:
    UK
    CiV already feels bloated to me, which is just as well as the developers seem to be done with it.

    Personally I just want CiVI - I'm not interested in Beyond Earth beyond the impact it's obviously going to have on how soon CiVI emerges.
     
  10. SamBC

    SamBC Emperor

    Joined:
    Feb 2, 2010
    Messages:
    1,052
    Location:
    Lancaster
    Interviews about XCOM development said the Firaxis building is divided in half, with quite separate and distinct teams - one does Civ, and by the sound of it nothing but, the other side does other projects; lately, that's been XCOM.

    So it's hardly either-or.
     
  11. Nikolai II

    Nikolai II Prince

    Joined:
    Jul 2, 2013
    Messages:
    405
    Location:
    Bergen, Norway
    BE, for sure.:)
     
  12. Eagle Pursuit

    Eagle Pursuit Scir-Gerefa

    Joined:
    Aug 12, 2010
    Messages:
    15,981
    I picked other. I think Civ V is on the verge of experiencing feature bloat. I don't think it needs more complications, to steal a term from watch-making. I think it is too soon for Civ VI, and apparently, I was right. I'm not super crazy about BE. I may buy it at the end of the year. So I would have preferred they work on an unrelated title while Civ VI simmers in the pot.
     
  13. FuRRie

    FuRRie King

    Joined:
    Jun 19, 2005
    Messages:
    903
    Location:
    Belgium
    Civ 5 is pretty good at the moment

    CBA is a welcome distraction to the normal empire building.
     
  14. Lyoncet

    Lyoncet Emperor

    Joined:
    Dec 20, 2009
    Messages:
    1,676
    Location:
    Minnesota
    ^This

    Civ V doesn't lack features. The things that would make it significantly better would take a huge reworking of the game (better management of 1UPT, better structure to diplomatic/strategic/tactical AI, more robust diplomacy, more modability, etc.) Your'e not going to get those by releasing more content for Civ V. You're going to get that by building something new from the ground up, or at least with a modified framework. Civ V is fun, and while it's not perfect, the flaws that can be covered up by adding more stuff have mostly been addressed. So let's celebrate what it is and look forward to a new opportunity to get things right.

    /fingerscrossed
     
  15. NASAROG

    NASAROG Prince

    Joined:
    Oct 30, 2008
    Messages:
    490
    Location:
    New England
    option D: all of the above!!!! I'd like another x:com expansion too please.

    For civ it could be a massive re-balance patch that addresses warmonger penalties, or at least a way to adjust them via slider.
     
  16. KevinLancaster

    KevinLancaster Prince

    Joined:
    May 16, 2011
    Messages:
    382
    Location:
    Canada
    I prefer Beyond Earth. I see a lot of other members would like additional DLC with new features for Civ 5 but I would not like that for a few reasons.

    First is incompatibility in multiplayer, I don't know if they've done anything or not with respect to this (I am not sure if it was Firaxis or Paradox that allowed all players to use whatever DLC the host had; leaning towards Paradox), but the Civ 5 multiplayer community is small enough (having dealt with the bugs that it had to) without being split further.

    Second, I don't want Paradox style DLCs in the recent fashion where they add a few new features with a large amount of bugs, fix some of them, make another DLC with more bugs as soon as possible, and so on forever. Even if you don't buy the DLC you get bugs because they come with the DLC patch. It's just a very poor experience. The DLCs add enough for their value that you should buy them, but if you do they don't work properly, and if you don't you still have issues. Thankfully there's an option to roll back to a previous patch but a game studio building a katamari of bugs and not doing anything about it is disturbing to me. We've already had enough issues with Civ 5 and it's development so far as it is.

    Thirdly, I don't want them trashing mod capability for DLC. I think they might have tried this in planning the release of Civ 5 but realized that mods have done a huge amount for the game series and in the end people, especially PC gamers, buy games if there are a large amount of mods available for them. They didn't even seem to be sure what to sell for the longest time with their mappacks and civpacks and they eventually plain stopped because what they were selling could be made by the community so it pointless if in the end they were just going to give it away for free. They tried selling mapscripts after BNW which are better (since these were technically using new features which the community didn't have access to yet), but I feel they are more of a testing grounds then anything, and they aren't necessary by any means so I don't think they sold that well. Heck I'm not sure if anyone even heard of it's release outside of Civ fansites, and even if a casual player bought them and played them in game it all looks the same anyhow, so what's the point? A lot of times you want a random map anyways, and you could always make one of your own or ask someone to if you really wanted a randomized continent or country map. In fact a good mapmaker would probably make one more balanced then a randomized script could. Lastly you already have mapscripts available in the community, which means you still run into the problem earlier where if you wait you get stuff for free! It's like some bizarre form of economic deflation. The alternative would be to end mod support but no one wants that.

    I think 2K has wisened up to the fact that DLC won't fly very well in these conditions, especially smaller ones. I would be very happy if they differentiated themselves from Paradox, and the rest of the gaming publisher community in this respect. The only problem is that it might cost them some immediate profits, but in the long run, through word of mouth, it will garner them more.

    Civilization V is not the fifth most-played game on Steam (behind Team Fortress 2 ahead of Counter Strike) four years after its release by chance. 2K, if you do read this, your policies in allowing it to maintain the old expansion pack model, along with mod support, have made it this way. It is a stable model. The Civilization franchise is successful. None of your other games are anywhere near as popular as Civilization, especially Civilization V. However, your goal is not stability. Your goal is growth. If you want to grow further, don't tamper with what you have done. Don't spoil the quality of the Civilization games. Change those variables which you can around it, change your marketing strategy; you can be number one.
     
  17. Civking5

    Civking5 Prince

    Joined:
    Sep 19, 2012
    Messages:
    393
    I voted for civBE. I think civBE for civ5 is like what civcol was for civ4. Something to do for developer to earn some capital while they are gearing up for Thier next big project (civ6).
     
  18. Antilogic

    Antilogic --

    Joined:
    Sep 2, 2006
    Messages:
    15,602
    Since I never got into Civ5, the choice is obvious. :)
     
  19. KrikkitTwo

    KrikkitTwo Immortal

    Joined:
    Apr 3, 2004
    Messages:
    12,417
    What I'd prefer most is Patches for Civ 5...
    and then civBE,

    because expansions always introduce new bugs+imbalances.

    It would be good to get Civ5 truly complete (take care of some balance issues and bugs) then move on to something new.
     
  20. AriochIV

    AriochIV Colonial Ninja

    Joined:
    Jul 25, 2006
    Messages:
    5,963
    Location:
    Nehwon
    I'd like for Firaxis to try their hand at making a Master of Orion style game, but I'll settle for a new Alpha Centauri.

    Not sure there's much they could do (that's worth doing) with more Civ V expansions, especially as regards new civilizations.
     
Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.

Share This Page