Morningcalm
Keeper of Records
They should have just gone for Hojo Masako for a female Japanese leader. The nun shogun was badass and better attested historically (even if there are some records of Himiko existing).
Counterpoints:They should have just gone for Hojo Masako for a female Japanese leader. The nun shogun was badass and better attested historically (even if there are some records of Himiko existing).
Not really. I agree with Morningcalm that the Nun Shogun would have been a far more interesting choice than a semi-mythical witch-queen from Japanese prehistory.It's an absurd hill to choose to die upon.
Himiko was a hero in Civ6 NFP, which means Hojo Masako would be more of a new face than Himiko, who has been in Civ twice.Houjou already got one of their people in the last Civ, Himiko is a new face outside of Vita's release of CivRev2 which practically no one present had played.
I’m pretty confused by the aggression thereIt's an absurd hill to choose to die upon.
Sinead O' Connor was pretty presentable and likeable?The artist team would get hammered to make a bald woman look presentable and likable to the audience
My only complaint is that America should not have two leaders upon release. You are NOT that historically important.![]()
Check the first post - I updated the table.where added? i'm not seeing any post?
Strongly agree that America's about on the bottom of the list of civs needing two leaders. I would have preferred to see Tubman instead of Franklin, especially after he inherited my most hated Hidden Agenda as his agenda.Franklin - A
Tubman - A
My only complaint is that America should not have two leaders upon release. You are NOT that historically important.
But IF the Americans were to have two leaders, and both of them leaders of a civil movement rather than presidents, I can't think of two better choices than Franklin and Tubman.
oh you mean she isn't officially announced??Check the first post - I updated the table.
India, China and France top my list, in that order. So I'm fairly pleased that France already has two leaders in Napoleon and Charlemagne.Strongly agree that America's about on the bottom of the list of civs needing two leaders. I would have preferred to see Tubman instead of Franklin, especially after he inherited my most hated Hidden Agenda as his agenda.
Assyria, Egypt, and not-Achaemenid Persia for me.India, China and France top my list, in that order.
Wait Charlemagne isn't German?India, China and France top my list, in that order. So I'm fairly pleased that France already has two leaders in Napoleon and Charlemagne.
Charlemagne is everything, technically. (and an ancestor to every white european)Wait Charlemagne isn't German?![]()