I don't think I've ever read about them ever actually doing anything.
You need to read more. Unless you don't count the various communist parties in the west as Marxist.
I don't think I've ever read about them ever actually doing anything.
Their icon was (is) Lenin. Marx, Engels, Hegel and others were considered more like founding fathers.and yeah...
that the communist party, especially the one in Russia, needed some icon for her political power, to legitimate a kind of "divine right" without a God/Religion......
That's just practical politics.
Their icon was (is) Lenin. Marx, Engels, Hegel and others were considered more like founding fathers.
Of course, classical marxism was transformed and developed by Lenin and others.
That would be the pigs in Animal Farm.
Of course, classical marxism was transformed and developed by Lenin and others.
The settlement of North America was an act of genocide and just as bad as the Holocaust.
the world is just as much better for the staggering wealth and opportunity that American settlers gave us.
I want Marxists to answer: what are you giving people?
Glad to educate you, but that was addressed to someone that had not read the book.Well, thanks for this J, I had no idea the pigs in Animal Farm were supposed to be the Bolsheviks. I mean, I don't think anyone knew before you figured it out
Please explain. Militarist and totalitarian I could understand, but those can be either right or left. In traditional conservative, that would make Stalin pro-csarist. He was emphatically not. Modern conservative, ie reduced regulation, pro-capitalism, fits even less. Your argument seems to be right-wing is all things bad, therefore Stalin is right-wing. Sommerswerd's son could point out the logic flaws in that position.Lenin was (and is) right-wing deviation from Marxism.
Please explain. Militarist and totalitarian I could understand, but those can be either right or left.
Not to mention right-wing ideas are in most cases inherently anti-communist.
What you mean? About massacre.
Nonsense.Militarism and authoritarianism are in fact inherently right-wing.
What? That isn't what I said. And the Bolsheviks were pretty emphatic in rejecting the "inevitability" propounded by the Orthodox Marxists, else they wouldn't have felt the need for the Terror and the subsequent, as you say, horror shows.Yes, yes, I'm well aware that old-fashioned Marxists had assurance of 'historical inevitability' in place of any actual ideas, which is probably one of the reasons that any regime calling itself Marxist has turned into a horror show.
I'm not saying that most Marxists aren't socialists of some stripe. Evidently they are. I'm saying that "Marxist" refers to a theoretical position, rather than a political one, and its proponents represent every shade of leftist opinion from social democracy to insurrectionary anarchism.FYI, I get to call these people Marxists for the same reason that you can label as fascist those who think that society should be organized martially and that low-IQ populations should expelled, no matter how vehemently they reject the term.
It's not just an association, though, it was an actual euphemism. "Cultural Marxism" is just a way of framing the New Left in terms of traditional anti-Semitic narratives.There's not much to communism or Marxism that hasn't been associated with Jews at some point, so this is hard to avoid.
there's nothing inherently right-wing about those concepts.
Lately it has been the left who are acting like totalitarians, especially on university campuses.
Actually, in an ideal scenario (which will never happen), the total wealth of the United States, which was $84.9 Trillion as of 2015, would be divided equally among its citizens (all 321.4 million of you). This nets a one-time payment of $264k per capita. If the United States can continue generating such wealth as a communist regime, everyone would be getting $56k (PPP) per annum.They're giving people the shirt off your back
No they are not.On the contrary, they are right-wing by definition.