I don't know who first defined Creative and it would be great to know!
It is claimed that Aristotle described Creative Mind as one that transforms potential things into actual things.
Aristotle seems most concerned with what Mind is, but are Mind and Creative two mutually exclusive concepts?
Nature has no mind. Are natural forces Creative when they produce unique and original forms such as those in a snowflake?
Such naturally occuring stuctures might be dismissed by thinkers because they offer no improvement over similar structures, but this strikes me as a non-issue. If things do not have permanent value, then no thing is an improvement, and the universe has dictated that no thing will be permanent.
What the smeg am I talking about?
It is claimed that Aristotle described Creative Mind as one that transforms potential things into actual things.
Aristotle seems most concerned with what Mind is, but are Mind and Creative two mutually exclusive concepts?
Nature has no mind. Are natural forces Creative when they produce unique and original forms such as those in a snowflake?
Such naturally occuring stuctures might be dismissed by thinkers because they offer no improvement over similar structures, but this strikes me as a non-issue. If things do not have permanent value, then no thing is an improvement, and the universe has dictated that no thing will be permanent.
What the smeg am I talking about?