• 📚 Admin Project Update: I've added a major feature to PictureBooks.io called Avatar Studio! You can now upload photos to instantly turn your kids (and pets! 🐶) into illustrated characters that star in their own stories. Give it a try and let me know what you think!

What is going on in the UK?

This happened,

Former British PM Sunak joins Microsoft, Anthropic in advisory roles​

Oct 9 (Reuters) - Former British Prime Minister Rishi Sunak said on Thursday he has joined U.S. tech giant Microsoft and AI startup Anthropic as a senior adviser.
Sunak, who stepped down as the leader of the opposition Conservative Party following a defeat in the general election last July, continues to serve as a member of the British Parliament.

In a LinkedIn post, Sunak said that the proceeds from the roles will be donated in full to The Richmond Project, a charity he started with his wife Akshata Murty.

Amazon and Google-backed Anthropic said that the internally focused, part-time advisory role fully complied with the conditions of the Advisory Committee on Business Appointments, or ACOBA, which oversees rules on new jobs for former ministers and senior civil servants.
Sunak will advise Anthropic on strategy, macroeconomic and geopolitical trends. The role focuses on global strategic matters, not UK-specific policy, and Sunak is prohibited from initiating contact with UK government officials on behalf of Anthropic.
At Microsoft, Sunak will provide strategic perspectives on macroeconomic and geopolitical trends. He will be speaking at the annual Microsoft Summit, according to an advice letter by ACOBA's interim chair, Isabel Doverty, posted to its website on Thursday. Sunak will not be advising on any UK policy matters.

The former prime minister cannot lobby for the firm for two years from his last day in ministerial office, nor draw on any privileged information from his time in government, according to the letter.
Microsoft did not immediately respond to a Reuters request for comment.
The development follows Sunak's July return to Goldman Sachs in an advisory role. He had previously worked at the Wall Street bank as an analyst in the early 2000s, before joining a series of hedge funds.
 
I quite liked Rishi Sunak finding him polite, positive and tolerant, but he made a number of key mistakes.

Normally I would argue that an MP should concentrate on his constituency business, but in this case I don't
think that it is a bad thing for him to stay low profile at Westminster and not risk undermining his successors.
 
Certainly nothing wrong with British paleontologists, a great fan of the BBC show Digging For Britain myself, would have made great thread title :)

"I thought long and hard about the name," said ichthyosaur expert Dr Dean Lomax, who co-authored authored the paper identifying the skeleton as a new species.

"Xiphodracon translates to sword-like dragon and that is in reference to that very long, sword-like snout, but also the fact that ichthyosaurs have been referred to as sea dragons for about 200 years."
 
Digging For Britain myself, would have made great thread title :)

That may be appropriate for the next thread, if our politicos get us into war.

A view has been expressed in other fora that Sir Keir Starmer may
seek his "Falklands" moment of glory to regain his standing in the polls.

Well alas, being paranoid does not preclude us from adverse events.
 

London Became a Global Hub for Phone Theft. Now We Know Why.​

About 80,000 phones were stolen in the British capital last year. The police are finally discovering where many of them went.


Six police officers in uniform and wearing gloves, standing in a phone shop.

Police officers searching a secondhand phone shop in north London last month.Credit...Andrew Testa for The New York Times
By Lizzie Dearden and Amelia Nierenberg

Reporting from London
Oct. 15, 2025Updated 9:29 a.m. ET
Sirens screamed as police vans pulled into a north London street, and shocked passers-by paused to watch as officers charged into three secondhand phone shops.

“Do you have a safe on your premises, sir?” one officer asked a shopkeeper, who was sitting next to his computer and a half-drunk cup of tea.

The man watched as they combed through phones, cash and documents from two safes. The raid, which The New York Times was invited to observe, was one of dozens carried out across the capital last month, part of a belated, highly visible effort by London’s Metropolitan Police to tackle the phone theft problem that has plagued the city in recent years.

The scale of the crime has gone beyond the pick-pocketing familiar to London since before Charles Dickens’s Oliver Twist made it famous. Increasingly brazen thieves, often masked and on e-bikes, have become adept at snatching phones from residents and tourists. A record 80,000 phones were stolen in the city last year, according to the police, giving London an undesirable reputation as a European capital for the crime.

Last month’s raids were aimed at identifying a group of middlemen who, the police say, use secondhand phone shops as part of a multilayered global criminal network. By the end of the two-week operation, detectives had found about 2,000 stolen phones and 200,000 pounds ($266,000) in cash.

After years in which phone theft was a low priority for an overstretched police force, the new operations are revealing the curious blend of factors behind the epidemic, including steep cuts to British police budgets in the 2010s and a lucrative black market for European cellphones in China.

A Mile of Aluminum Foil​

For years, London’s police assumed most of the phone thefts were the work of small-time thieves looking to make some quick cash. But last December, they got an intriguing lead from a woman who had used “Find My iPhone” to track her device to a warehouse near Heathrow Airport. Arriving there on Christmas Eve, officers found boxes bound for Hong Kong. They were labeled as batteries but contained almost 1,000 stolen iPhones.

“It quickly became apparent this wasn’t just normal low-level street crime,” said Mark Gavin, a senior detective leading the investigation for the Metropolitan Police. “This was on an industrial scale.”

The breakthrough coincided with a broader push by the police to increase public confidence by tackling the city’s most common crimes. Phone theft has been the subject of particular anger among victims, who for years reported their cellphones stolen and handed the police the locations being transmitted, only to be given a crime reference number and hear nothing more.

The police are now using that information to map where stolen phones are transported by street thieves. After the Heathrow seizure, a team of specialist investigators who normally deal with firearms and drug smuggling was assigned to the case. They identified further shipments and used forensics to identify two men in their 30s who are suspected of being ringleaders of a group that sent up to 40,000 stolen phones to China.
Image
16uk-phone-theft-04-vcmf-articleLarge.jpg

A picture made available by the Metropolitan Police of seized phones wrapped in foil to prevent them from transmitting tracking signals.Credit...Metropolitan Police
Image
16uk-phone-theft-03-vcmf-articleLarge.jpg

Boxes of stolen phones bound for Hong Kong found in a warehouse near Heathrow Airport, in a photograph made available by the police.Credit...Metropolitan Police
When the men were arrested on Sept. 23, the car they were traveling in contained several phones, some wrapped in aluminum foil in an attempt to prevent them from transmitting tracking signals. At one point, the police said at a news conference, they observed the men buying almost 1.5 miles’ worth of foil in Costco.

Some phones are reset and sold to new users in Britain. But many are shipped to China and Algeria as part of a “local-to-global criminal business model,” the police said, adding that in China, the newest phones could be sold for up to $5,000, generating huge profits for the criminals involved.

Joss Wright, an associate professor at the University of Oxford who specializes in cybersecurity, said that it is easier to use stolen British phones in China than elsewhere because many of the country’s network providers do not subscribe to an international blacklist that bars devices that have been reported stolen.

“That means that a stolen iPhone that has been blocked in the U.K. can be used without any problems in China,” Mr. Wright said.

E-Bikes and Balaclavas​

The exporters are at the top of a three-tier criminal network, the police say. In the middle are the shopkeepers and entrepreneurs who buy stolen phones from thieves and sell them to unsuspecting members of the public or pass them on for transport abroad. On the lowest tier are the thieves. Their numbers have risen in line with the juicy profits on offer, and a growing sense of impunity.

Overall crime in London has fallen in recent years, but phone theft is disproportionately high, representing about 70 percent of thefts last year. And it has risen sharply: The 80,000 phone thefts last year were a stark increase from the 64,000 in 2023, the police told a parliamentary committee in June.

That is partly because this crime is both “very lucrative” and “lower risk” than car theft or drug dealing, Cmdr. Andrew Featherstone, the police officer leading the effort to tackle phone theft, told a news conference. Thieves can make up to £300 (about $400) per device — more than triple the national minimum wage for a day’s work.

And they know they are unlikely to be caught. Police data shows about 106,000 phones were reported stolen in London from March 2024 to February 2025. Only 495 people were charged or were given a police caution, meaning they admitted to an offense.
Image
A police officer in uniform kneeling on the ground in a shop, next to a safe. Another police officer stands in the background.

Sgt. Matt Chantry searching a shop in north London. He said in an interview that thieves on e-bikes were “a real problem,” partly because chasing them through London traffic was high risk.Credit...Andrew Testa for The New York Times
Of course, many other large cities, including New York, face phone theft. The police in London argue that varying crime recording practices make it impossible to identify where in the world the problem is worst.

But many experts blame a specifically British issue: the impact of years of austerity imposed by Conservative-led governments in the 2010s, which led to cuts in the number of police officers and their budgets. In 2017, the Met said it would stop investigating low-level crimes where it judged there was little prospect of catching the culprits, so it could prioritize tackling serious violence and sexual offenses.

Emmeline Taylor, a professor of criminology at City St. George’s, University of London, said in an interview that the police “became more of a reactive force,” adding, “Low-level career criminals realized that they were getting away with the crimes they were committing.”

Then, a technological advance arrived that made their work even easier: electric bikes. Lime bikes, which can be rented and dropped off anywhere, launched in London in 2018. They exploded in popularity. Before long, e-bikes were the getaway vehicles of choice for phone thieves.

Sgt. Matt Chantry, one of the leaders of the raid last month, said in an interview that thieves on e-bikes were “a real problem.” They mount sidewalks and swipe phones from people’s hands at high speed, he said, while making themselves “unidentifiable” by wearing balaclavas and hoods. “How do you police that?” he asked.

Attempting to chase them on London’s sometimes gridlocked streets is “high-risk,” he said, endangering pedestrians, other drivers and the offender. Ultimately, he said, the police had to ask, is the risk of a fatality worth it for a cellphone?

Lost and Found: 4,000 iPhones​

The raid on the three secondhand shops in north London last month paid off, with the police recovering £40,000 and five stolen phones. Those handsets will join around 4,000 other stolen iPhones recovered by the police since December, currently held in a storeroom in Putney, southwest London, as officers try to contact their owners.

In the longer term, Commander Featherstone said, the police want to dismantle the criminal networks driving the illicit trade and “disincentivize criminals from wanting to steal phones” by making it clear they can be caught.
Image
Rows of boxed cellphones in a store case.

Thieves can make up to £300 (about $400) per device — more than triple the daily national minimum wage.Credit...Andrew Testa for The New York Times

But the police are also hoping users will become more savvy about their personal security. Even as smartphones have become more advanced and valuable, many people’s handling of them has become less protective. For the modern phone thief, a classic mark is a pedestrian walking close to the curb, deeply absorbed by the content on a cell screen — a map, a text, a video.

“You wouldn’t count your money on the street,” said Lawrence Sherman, an emeritus criminology professor at the University of Cambridge. “But when the phone is worth £1,000, it’s like pulling £1,000 out of your wallet and looking at it as you walk.”
 
Liz Kendall admits that digital ID would really be a digital key to access services and "much more besides"

With every passing day, more evidence is emerging that our worst fears about digital ID are about to come true. We don’t have to speculate any more, we just have to listen to what our politicians are openly admitting in parliament. Check this out from Liz “4.5%” Kendall:

[Video of Liz Kendall in the House]

Notice how we’ve gone from needing digital ID to show our employers that we’re not illegal immigrants to needing digital ID to “rent or buy a home, apply for a job, open a bank account, and much more besides.”

Kendall said: “In the age of the smart phone, we can take this control into our own hands”. She then talked about buying alcoholic drinks, joining a library, and enrolling our children in school.

Kendall kept talking about giving people “control”. She used the word “control” over and over again, but digital ID will not give us more control. What Kendall meant is the government would have control over your life. Total control.

If you don’t believe me, watch the video again. Listen to how Kendall talks about giving people “control” over who can access their data and who sees it. The government is introducing a system where we will be forced to share our data against our will. That is not giving us control, it is taking control away from from us!

If there is one positive here it’s that many MPs (the ones who have not been corrupted by the people behind the push for digital IDs) are getting cold feet. One after another, politicians from all parties stood up in parliament to pick holes in Kendall’s plan, presumably because they are realising they would be under surveillance too.

As many pointed out, Kendall is no longer using the ridiculous line that digital IDs are about defeating illegal immigration. She is saying they are about “convenience”, in which case, why wasn’t the government honest about its intentions? Why did it have to pretend digital ID was about one issue (illegal immigration) and claim it would not be used beyond proving your right to work? If the government was hiding something then, what is it still hiding now?

As Conservative MP Julia Lopez pointed out, this would be not be a digital ID, but a digital key, and the thing about a key is that if you lose it, you lose access. We are already living in a time when we can’t access websites unless we agree to scan our faces, email accounts, or passports. Ask yourself what we will be denied access to next.

Odeon Cinema is now demanding digital ID which leads me onto the next problem: it’s not just about what the government can demand from you but private companies.

There is nothing stopping any company from demanding your digital ID before you access their services. This is already taking place in India where we have seen the mother of all data breaches. Eight hundred million Indians now have their personal data available for sale on the dark web.

Starmer wants to implement a system in the UK that, if anything, would be even more intrusive than the Aadhaar system. Soon, every aspect of your life could be available for all to see and there is nothing you could do about it.
 
WTK is happening in the UK, and especially with Labour ? They are rushing full speed ahead toward straight-up dystopian cyberpunk dictatorship, what exactly went through their head ?
 
WTK is happening in the UK, and especially with Labour ? They are rushing full speed ahead toward straight-up dystopian cyberpunk dictatorship, what exactly went through their head ?

They are riding a dying tiger called western financial capitalism.

Some of the more brainwashed think it will carry them into the promised land. Others have doubts, but are afraid that if they get off the dying tiger, it will eat them.
Those in these two categories have purged most of the others from the party. There are unpurged dissenters e.g. my MP who are merely trying to survive by lying low.

There is a problem with intellectual analysis and imagination, top down central party systems inevitably develop so as to stifle initiative and innovation. We saw this in the USSR too.


I certainly can't see Starmer being returned by voters in a democratic election at this point.

He still has a very good chance. Nigel Farage has a lot of incorrigible eccentrics in his party that may yet sink him; and Kemi
Badenoch has not realised that, as the conservative party is polling third, there are few benefits in her proposing policy changes.
Nigel Farage also has the same dilemma as the other parties. He cannot really reform the UK without confronting financial
capitalism, and if he does confront them, they will turn against him as they turned against Michael Foot and Jeremy Corbyn.

If I seem particularly down on centrism as of late, Starmer is why.

Hes far from alone, but he is speedrunning the loss.

I cannot debate this, because I have never been quite sure what centrism is.
 
WTK is happening in the UK, and especially with Labour ? They are rushing full speed ahead toward straight-up dystopian cyberpunk dictatorship, what exactly went through their head ?
They're doing exactly what the Tories wanted to do.

Which is what every leftist warned folks about, while in response said folks scoffed and said border control was an understandable and rational concern to pursue (enforcing). ID cards are (read as: digital ID is) an "anti-immigration" move just as popularising opposing the "small boats crisis" is. The Tories themselves suggested ID cards not too long ago!

Turns out policies are related to party ideology. Who knew?!

Don't worry though! They're only going for the bad foreigners. And non-violent protestors. And anyone foreign heads of state take issue with. Labour are on the case. The Tories, too. And don't get me started on Reform.

But let's not pretend this is a surprise, eh?

EDIT

Obligatory lol at Edward believing that Farage is suffering from any kind of dilemma. The man's exactly where he wants to be. Farage is a big fan of both capitalism and immigrants (especially when it suits his marital status). He just likes selling the idea that he isn't.

(but that's a big part of it - anti-immigrant views are generally highest in areas where actual immigration is low, because of, uh, reasons I can't explain because people might mistakenly believe I'm targeting individuals instead of speaking generally about the country I was born in, live in and therefore care about)

EDIT EDIT

Hi folks! I can't imagine many folks missed me (nor am I fishing for anything) - just doing a speedrun here! Hades 2 is a good game! Cheerio!
 
Back
Top Bottom