Headbanger
Warlord
- Joined
- Jan 2, 2008
- Messages
- 198
I agree, in a way. Its darn near impossible to conquer to large continent without them. Untill you get railroad foot soldiers are useless.
The celts wholly disagree,
I agree, in a way. Its darn near impossible to conquer to large continent without them. Untill you get railroad foot soldiers are useless.
Okay .. most foot soldiers ... discounting bunches of drunken ginger haired scottish lunatics.
Nope trews are scottish dress as well ... Its just the way I imagine them .. I've been out in glasgow on a Saturday night .. I know what I'm talking about lol
I'm not saying that chariots are/were weak units in real combat. They were devastating. I was only agreeing that Civ's chariots are weak compared to the real ones.
used iron swords, which bent in combat ..
Its a generalisation though, like a lot of stuff in Civ.
So did the norse swords. THere are documentations of strong warriors bending thier swords back into shape before battle.
So did the Norse swords. There are documentations of strong warriors bending their swords back into shape before battle.
The Arabs had swords that bent in a different sense, they could be doubled almost in half and then twang (there's probably a better word as the former gives the impression of flimsy, which they weren't) back to their original position. Unfortunately, the "recipe" was a greatly guarded secret and has since been lost.