Discussion in 'Civ4 - General Discussions' started by Hylt22, Oct 26, 2012.
What's your favorite civ in civ 4, and why?
Justinian Bieber and Charles the Gay
I like the Sumerians a lot - pretty good UU, good UB. Hate the leader though, so I seldom play them.
.,i love picking the Carthaginians.. ,does that mean i'm cheating??
Dutch and Carthage.
Is this question exclusive of the Leader, as that changes things a lot?
Carthage as a Civ, exclusive of Leader, is okay. So-so UU and fairly specific UB. Hannibal is a fine leader though, so as a whole they are strong.
When thinking of a "Civ", exclusive of leader, I first think of Starting techs and synergy. UU and UB second.
So, for instance, Pacal is my favorite leader, but Mayans by themselves aren't that great although there UU/UB are quite solid. Starting techs aren't great.
Best starting tech combos are 2 of Agriculture, Mining and The Wheel.
So I'd say Ottomans, China and Mali are solid civs. And yeah, Sumeria is nice as a civ too - nice starting techs and good early UB. And, ofc, Egypt.
India and Spain get honorable mentions for the great UUs, but starting techs and UBs not so hot.
I'd probably say my favorite "Civ" are the Ottomans, probably as I really like Mehmed. (Don't even care about Janissary, by the way)
.,here either, i rarely use numidian cavalries(for flanking promotion but lesser strength??..for me they're still weak).,.i guess Fireaxis really tried to balance everything from traits to starting techs to UU to UB..
I love Dutch.. Its just so nice CIV - starting techs that usually are great, traits that don't need to explain (creative is trait that allow to destroy early enemy city without war ), UU that let me to control seas, UB that let production jump up to the sky.. Best for big maps with lot of water and lot of AI And with this CIV i play 1 difficulty level higher to make it equal difficult than just with random civ/leader...
No, only picking Inca is cheating.
For a first time player, my favorite would be Hatty.
My personal favorite that I always seem to do well with is Washington. I know objectively there are better leaders but I do the best with him.
.,with those Q's??
,maybe..mostly in higher levels where ai's have opening archers...
.,so, it is prohibited then!?
Probably Elizabeth of England. I love the trait combination. I also love Redcoats. They come at the perfect time as I tend to war at about the rifleman age.
IIRC Inca isn't allowed for certain games but I'm not certain.
If you're playing lower levels the warrior rush is available and Q's have free Combat I, same as Agressive leaders. Q rush is actually better on lower levels, it's just that Agressive leaders can do the same.
Inca still has a tip-top UB and two good traits as well. Very few UB's can rival the Terrace.
Yeah, Inca are the only civ with two top tier uniques as far as I'm concerned. Even without rushing with them, Quechuas are awesome. (Playing as god intended, Huayna is well above average too).
My favourite leader is Gandhi. Not sure why, as both his traits are above average rather than great. They have some synergy I guess, but nothing spectacular. Could be that I just get lucky maps with him...
I like Spain a lot recently. Both the uniques are fun, and for me at least have a novelty value since I used to avoid playing them. Mongols are definitely my favourite if I'm going to war early. Best with some kind of a Charismatic leader.
Gandhi's traits are fantastic.
Spain's Conquistador is the best UU next to the Faster worker, for me. (I'm not a Q guy) I never build Citadel's though unless for some reason I don't have horses and go the Steel route.
I guess individually I would consider PHI and SPI better than anything except ORG and FIN, but not that much better (I rate all the other traits except AGG, PRO and IMP as average). My estimation of PHI has been going down steadily over the years, but it does suit my play-style.
Citadels are definitely a little frustrating, but I like taking out the first couple of cities and SoD with siege, and finishing off the rest of the empire with horses, so citadels help out there.
I personally love Justinian I/Byzantium, but I have no problem with playing any specific leaders.
Russia/Catherine is my beloved ^^ Not when I'm playing it but when I play against it ! Don't You just love her when she slaps Your face in fury while Your SoD proceeds to take over her lands ?
I like the Persians because Cyrus is creative, and his immortals are dominate in the early game.
Cyrus is charismatic and imperialistic. He is not bad though. Darius has obviously better traits, but although IMP is considered on the not-so-hot side, there is synergy there with charismatic. Cyrus can get a lot of GGs with IMP and CHAR makes good use of them. Plus, Persians have good starting techs to get IMMs online asap.
Cyrus was creative in Vanilla.
Separate names with a comma.