amadeus
Serenity now
Two-cent thought: nobody ever takes offense at the audience. If they laugh at the joke, what does that mean?
I didn't laugh until he mentioned the Jehovah's Witnesses. Because they were unexpected there and didn't quite fit into the rest of the list. And then the rest is just easy absurd humour, bringing Jehovah's witnesses and Nazi guards together.
I however didn't even understand, that "positives" was supposed to be a punchline. And that to me is an important distinction: if a joke ain't funny, it better not be offensive. Because unfunny jokes (where the punchline involves a person or group or belief) are just insults. So if you wanna go there, better be funny. Or as in this case, embed it in a context like here, where it's used to explain how a joke may work.
I disagree, I don't think the joke is funny, but that's me, personally. I do also agree with the "don't punch down", but that doesn't apply here and is more apt when talking about Sarcasm and Irony rather than humour in general.
Explain why no man should be making rape jokes.
Unbelievable.Why is that idea difficult to support with arguments?
Why is that relevant?
Side comment: Not sure which time frame you're referring to, but Rome did conquer Egypt (Battle of Actium in 30 BCE; Octavian vs. Antony & Cleopatra; Octavian won).This has nothing to do with their origins. "Rom" means man and has nothing to do with the Romans. They never settled in Egypt: the Egyptian origin is a misconception made by Europeans due to their dark skin color.
Takes offense the audience in general, or at the audience's reaction?Two-cent thought: nobody ever takes offense at the audience. If they laugh at the joke, what does that mean?
You mean like asking in a thread about the subject why we shouldn't be making rape jokes?Unbelievable.
IT'S NOT AN ACADEMIC DISCUSSION TO THE VICTIMS.
If you really don't understand, please remedy that.
Would you have less issue if the proposal was "nobody can make rape jokes"? I'm not saying you'd have no issue, I'm just trying to gauge where the problem sits. Whether it's on the "men can't" or "no rape jokes", primarily.You mean like asking in a thread about the subject why we shouldn't be making rape jokes?
That's a good idea, I should try that.
People are saying "no rape jokes" but not giving any reason. Without a reason why people think they should not be allowed it is hard to say why they should be.Would you have less issue if the proposal was "nobody can make rape jokes"? I'm not saying you'd have no issue, I'm just trying to gauge where the problem sits. Whether it's on the "men can't" or "no rape jokes", primarily.
I mean, there's a separate tangent about people objecting to others expressing a preference (that people shouldn't make rape jokes) but that's a bit meta.People are saying "no rape jokes" but not giving any reason. Without a reason why people think they should not be allowed it is hard to say why they should be.
As I said above, I have never heard a rape joke I thought was appropriate, and I could say that society have not accepted the gender imbalance at the core of rape so is not "grown up" enough to deal with rape jokes. I am not going to say they should be banned, and I suspect some here have their own reasons. If they tell us what they are we could probably have a grown up discussion about them.
No, it's a discussion about humor. If we can make jokes about genocide, I'd say pretty much nothing is off the table.Unbelievable.
IT'S NOT AN ACADEMIC DISCUSSION TO THE VICTIMS.
This is true, and I feel in such cases it is well worth trying as you may find your feelings of self-evidentiary do not hold up to scrutiny. As a great man once said, "If you can't explain it simply, you don't understand it well enough."Sometimes it's hard to explain something that is felt to be self-evident.
You play the role of a vengfull god who will kill a large proportion of their followers (Civ 4 whipping is the most powerful mechanic) and usually aims to genocide every other nationallity on earth (Conquest/Domination are the most common wins). There are few games with a more offensive premise.Ok, here's a thought.
Do you think people should play the game Civilization?
I mean .... there's nukes in the game, mass murder, slavery. Those are also bad, right?
People are saying "no rape jokes" but not giving any reason. Without a reason why people think they should not be allowed it is hard to say why they should be.
As I said above, I have never heard a rape joke I thought was appropriate, and I could say that society have not accepted the gender imbalance at the core of rape so is not "grown up" enough to deal with rape jokes. I am not going to say they should be banned, and I suspect some here have their own reasons. If they tell us what they are we could probably have a grown up discussion about them.
Stellaris' purifiers are asking me to hold their beer.You play the role of a vengfull god who will kill a large proportion of their followers (Civ 4 whipping is the most powerful mechanic) and usually aims to genocide every other nationallity on earth (Conquest/Domination are the most common wins). There are few games with a more offensive premise.
I certainly can sympathise with this. There are some topics that I stay away from because they upset me too much and it is better for me to not engage with. I do not expect to change anyones mind about them though, as I am not engaging with them.@Samson it is offensive at times to be asked to explain something as basic as this. It's not necessary to do so, and anyone demanding such an explanation is either so extremely disconnected from their humanity that they'll never understand, or are arguing in bad faith. In either case they are not worth responding to.