I want to get an idea of how much play-testing others have done and how they feel about it generally because it's difficult to get a sense of the broader bright spots and issues when you're looking at individual posts about particular playthroughs. I've been fairly systematic. I've played all civs up to Muscovy so far, I played every civ on 3000BC, except Muscovy I played on both 3000 and 600. I guess I will also try the others on 600 but not sure when. I play on normal timescale and (don't judge, it's a good starting point, and honestly what I normally play) heir. So far, I'm finding fulfilling historic victories somewhat to substantially more difficult for most civs, and in some cases seemingly impossible. On the other hand I'm finding non-historic play quite interesting, especially with new resources and a relatively unfamiliar map. What's your vibe so far?
Which civs have you played on the big map?
- Thread starter Bu77Trout
- Start date
Dracosolon
King
For civs I've played to completions it's mostly the ones from the Ancient Era: Egypt, Babylonia, Harappa, Assyria, China, Hittites, Nubia, Greece, India, Phoenicia, Polynesia, Celts, Rome, Maya.
Add to that Toltecs, France and Kievan Rus.
I've tested a lot of other civs but haven't completed them - kind of taken a break from the game the last few months.
Add to that Toltecs, France and Kievan Rus.
I've tested a lot of other civs but haven't completed them - kind of taken a break from the game the last few months.
Lokki242
Emperor
Every one! I made a big post in the general discussion page that might be worth a look.
Similar threads
