warpus
In pork I trust
I had to vote porn star. I figure if we all became soldiers and had a World War it would be awful. But if we all became porn stars and had a World orgy it might not be so bad
The wisest thing you have ever said!
I had to vote porn star. I figure if we all became soldiers and had a World War it would be awful. But if we all became porn stars and had a World orgy it might not be so bad
That's why I think a porn star is more moral. When you're talking about morality you need to apply to it to the concept of universality.
Soldiers kill people. If everyone killed each other the world would be hell. This is why murder is obviously immoral. Porn stars have sex. If everyone had sex with each other the world would be somewhat fine. At least better than the first option.
Hmm, I think I saw a movie about that once. The heroines found a man trapped under an avalanche & had to nurse him back to life... literally. Milky Mountain I think it was called.
Wrong application of the Kantian principle, though. You can't ask "What if everyone killed each other?". That question applies to murder, as you said, and not soldiery.
Edit: Or are you saying the action is soldiering, not killing or murder? If that is the case, what does soldiering entail?
Killing other soldiers in war. What would happen if everyone, faced with an enemy soldier during a war, killed their enemy? Pretty much what happens nowadays anyway!
Just having fun. Nobody's denying soliders do noble things but their main purpose is to kill in the name of the country's interests.Fascinating. Did you have a point with that comment or are you just spamming the thread?
And what do soldiers do when they are faced against enemy soldiers? They kill. Again, it's not about killing the enemy, it's about killing in itself.
So killing is wrong, full stop? In that case I don't think we're going to agree.
If you kill a bank robber to save everyone, that's immoral because you still killed someone and killing is wrong.
Just having fun. Nobody's denying soliders do noble things but their main purpose is to kill in the name of the country's interests.
Is the first thing you learn how to handle surrendering enemy soliders or how to hold and fire a gun? What do they teach in basic training? How to tactfully deal with civilians?That's like saying a researcher's main purpose is to fail experiments and use up funding. A lot of it happens to be sure, and it is significant to the job, but how is killing the primary goal of a soldier's duty? If it was, I doubt the question of how to handle so many surrendering enemy soldiers would have been so pertinent during Operation Desert Storm.
If everyone had sex with each other the world would be somewhat fine. At least better than the first option.
At least the pornographic actress knows she's getting screwed.