1. We have added a Gift Upgrades feature that allows you to gift an account upgrade to another member, just in time for the holiday season. You can see the gift option when going to the Account Upgrades screen, or on any user profile screen.
    Dismiss Notice

Which is a more moral profession?

Discussion in 'Off-Topic' started by Narz, Nov 18, 2011.

?

Which is the more righteous profession?

  1. Porn Star

    46.4%
  2. Modern Solidier

    53.6%
  1. Tee Kay

    Tee Kay Just a passenger

    Joined:
    Aug 21, 2005
    Messages:
    21,833
    Gender:
    Male
    Location:
    Melbourne
    In war, all roads lead to hell.
     
  2. civver_764

    civver_764 Chieftain

    Joined:
    May 19, 2007
    Messages:
    6,436
    Gender:
    Male
    Location:
    San Jose, CA
    edit: ^ Or profit.

    These disingenuous analogies aren't convincing at all, fyi. You're making several ridiculous assumptions:

    That America engages in these "interventions" to serve anyone's interests but its own.
    That the only people killed are the "bad guys".
    That things would have been worse off without the "intervention".
    That these "interventions" are inherently practical and never result in too much collateral damage.

    All of which are demonstrably false.
     
  3. Tani Coyote

    Tani Coyote Canis Latranscendental

    Joined:
    May 28, 2007
    Messages:
    14,960
    Gender:
    Male
    People state the military is necessary for freedom.

    Here's a question, however. How often do our soldiers actually fight for our freedom, rather than going overseas and intervening in other nations' disputes, or in general being unprovoked?

    Protecting against invaders? Most certainly, the military is useful in that regard, but that doesn't mean you go out and station troops all over the globe like a chess board. It means you keep them at home, as a metaphorical "Keep out" sign to anybody who would otherwise ponder invasion.

    Plus, I'll repeat, it completely ignores the different motives people have for enlisting.

    Here's an experiment: Get rid of all soldiers' paychecks. Let's see how many will stay then. Those who do stay are there to protect their nation. The huge numbers that desert, on the other hand, were only there for some benefit.

    That's not to disparage those who have died in combat, of course, and their sacrifice is very noble, as they put their life on the line. But we should at least elevate the police and firefighters to their level since they risk their lives all the time as well.

    Do I respect those who have the courage to enlist? Of course I do. But I won't kid myself into thinking that everything they're asked to do is protecting our freedom. They are young people, often thrown into the jaws of death, to serve whatever purpose the government has for them. Rarely is the purpose altruistic, of course, so the gov't is quick to peddle it as protecting freedoms.

    You don't need a huge army to protect freedoms though; all you need is a few nukes to use against conventional foes, and a vigilant police force to take care of crimals and unconventional foes.
     
  4. holy king

    holy king Chieftain

    Joined:
    Jan 3, 2003
    Messages:
    16,323
    Location:
    Vienna, Austria
    willing to die isnt really the issue, but does being willing to kill deserve respect regardless of the politics involved?

    does being willing to kill ever deserve respect?
     
  5. Artifis

    Artifis El Gato is not happy

    Joined:
    May 6, 2011
    Messages:
    418
    Location:
    Lancre
    At least the porn star doesn't exist for killing.
     
  6. Leoreth

    Leoreth 心の怪盗団 Moderator

    Joined:
    Aug 23, 2009
    Messages:
    33,052
    Gender:
    Male
    Location:
    Leblanc
    It's you who started to judge the profession of soldiers by narrowing down the perspective to American soldiers alone. I don't even want to make an argument about the morality of soldiers of a democratic country vs. soldiers of a dictatorship (although we seem to have different opinions there, it's really not relevant). Point is, soldiers that not only kill as part of their profession, but also support an immoral regime in the process exist. I don't see for which reason this shouldn't reflect on the morality of the profession of soldiers as a whole.
     
  7. ArneHD

    ArneHD Just a little bit mad

    Joined:
    May 16, 2006
    Messages:
    3,153
    Location:
    Tromsø, Norway
    I'm not convinced that a job can be inherently righteous when put without context. Only a person can be righteous, and while people with varying levels of righteousness may gravitate towards specific professions, no job is inherently more or less righteous than any other. The people doing them can be, but the jobs themselves are morally neutral.
     
  8. .Nightingale

    .Nightingale Chieftain

    Joined:
    Nov 22, 2008
    Messages:
    12
    One brings pleasure and (rarely) hurts anybody.

    The other always brings pain and death, sometimes for justifiable reasons, but not most of the time.
     
  9. Souron

    Souron The Dark Lord

    Joined:
    Mar 9, 2003
    Messages:
    5,947
    Location:
    (GMT-5)
    Soldiers are morally ambigious because there is rarely certainty that a given war or engagement is justified, and the cost is rather high if it isn't. Porn starts are morally ambigious because a society with a large adult entertainment industry may be inferior to one with a smaller one by some metrics, and being a porn star contributes to that industry.

    To me a porn star is a good deal less morally ambigious.
     
  10. MantaRevan

    MantaRevan Chieftain

    Joined:
    Oct 9, 2011
    Messages:
    1,537
    That summarizes what I said.
     
  11. GoodGame

    GoodGame Red, White, & Blue, baby!

    Joined:
    Dec 17, 2004
    Messages:
    13,725
    A soldier provides security and achieves national aims. A porn star merely provides entertainment, at best. I guess if you hate the nation, a porn star might seem more moral.

    Being a soldier for an immoral nation would probably be immoral in itself, but that was not what was asked.
     
  12. aelf

    aelf Ashen One

    Joined:
    Sep 16, 2005
    Messages:
    16,306
    Location:
    Tir ná Lia
    So what do you think was asked, then? Whether it's moral to be a soldier for a 'moral nation'?
     
  13. Berzerker

    Berzerker Warlord

    Joined:
    Dec 30, 2000
    Messages:
    17,069
    Location:
    the golf course
    if somebody's trying to kill you, would you want the porn star or the soldier risking their life to save you?

    If either stepped in and saved your life, would you respect them for that?
     
  14. GoodGame

    GoodGame Red, White, & Blue, baby!

    Joined:
    Dec 17, 2004
    Messages:
    13,725
    What was asked, Aelf, was clearly what is the more moral occupation. Unfortunately, as asked, the question ignores key circumstances, Aelf.

    Why did you put 'moral nation' in parentheses?
     
  15. Leoreth

    Leoreth 心の怪盗団 Moderator

    Joined:
    Aug 23, 2009
    Messages:
    33,052
    Gender:
    Male
    Location:
    Leblanc
    Wait, what's your definition of morals? That's utilitarianism at best.
     
  16. aelf

    aelf Ashen One

    Joined:
    Sep 16, 2005
    Messages:
    16,306
    Location:
    Tir ná Lia
    The question is general and hence a general answer seems to be called for. And since nations, even the more 'moral' ones, have engaged in military acts that are immoral, we have to take into account the fact that many soldiers have been complicit in and party to immoral acts.

    So it seems rather the case that you're interested in ignoring the question as it is asked.
     
  17. MantaRevan

    MantaRevan Chieftain

    Joined:
    Oct 9, 2011
    Messages:
    1,537
    I concur.
     
  18. Atlas14

    Atlas14 "Sophomoric Troll Master"

    Joined:
    Apr 11, 2004
    Messages:
    7,502
    Location:
    Maryland
    You've pinpointed a single instance in which a soldier would be almost 100% certainly useful to me. The soldier in this case would be acting in my self-defense.

    Soldiers, however, in real life, are carrying out orders from people not in any immediate danger. They are tools used by politicians and men of power.

    I'm a nice guy, I probably would for a bit. Wouldn't change my opinion that soldiers do not possess a moral profession.


    The problem is that it is a poor hypothetical to begin with. How many nations use their soldiers entirely for defense purposes?
     
  19. Berzerker

    Berzerker Warlord

    Joined:
    Dec 30, 2000
    Messages:
    17,069
    Location:
    the golf course
    you've blamed the solder for the politician
     
  20. MantaRevan

    MantaRevan Chieftain

    Joined:
    Oct 9, 2011
    Messages:
    1,537
    Volunteering for service is like agreeing to become a pawn. It's their own fault, not the politician's. Conscription is a different story.
     

Share This Page