Which party are you voting for in the U.S Senate race?

Which party are you voting for in the U.S Senate race?

  • Democrats

    Votes: 21 43.8%
  • Republicans

    Votes: 6 12.5%
  • Libertarians

    Votes: 4 8.3%
  • Constituiton

    Votes: 0 0.0%
  • Greens

    Votes: 2 4.2%
  • Socialists

    Votes: 5 10.4%
  • Independents

    Votes: 2 4.2%
  • Other

    Votes: 8 16.7%

  • Total voters
    48
Or, you could try and educate yourself about what has the better chance of working :p
However, I am not willing to be voting for the Party of NO after sins with crashing the Economy and two wars under Bush's helm. I aint going to be voting Republican any time soon and the fringe tea party faction is not helping there case.
 
The problem with that is that there are many issues that any candidate will deal with over time.
 
I'm not even old to vote in 2012 :(. Only 5 months away...:(

I turn 18 the day after the inauguration:lol:

Do you live in a contested district, or a safe one? If the latter is true, it can be worth voting for a third party to make a point, knowing that the overwhelming tendency towards one party makes a single vote near-irrelevant no matter which way they vote.

I actually agree with you, though chances are the third party I'd vote for isn't the same as yours:lol:

I live in New York State, Eastern Long Island, so chances are pretty good its a Democratic safe state, but people REALLY hate the Dems right now and I've seen tons of posters for Randy Altschultzer and Chris Cox, both of which IIRC are centrist Republicans.

So, the GOP MIGHT win, but the question is, if they did, how much good would it do? We all know they will NEVER reverse a bill the Democrats passed already even if the opportunity is right in front of them.

If I could vote now, I'd vote Republican in general I MIGHT have voted for Ron Paul instead of Mccain in protest of what I consider a HORRIBLE abortion stance for Mccain. (And no, not for allowing it in cases of rape incest or the mother's life. That's not why I wouldn't vote for him. My reasoning would be because he "Magically" changed his position from a pro-choice position to that when he started to run for president:lol:)

However, at the current trend, in 10 years I will no longer be able to vote for Republicans because they are already "European Center-right" and, to be frank, if I lived in England I'd vote UKIP.
 
I'll be two years off the mark comes 2012.

If I could vote, I would vote for the candidates not the party.
 
Dom said:
I turn 18 the day after the inauguration
You are 16!?
You are older than I thought.
 
I actually agree with you, though chances are the third party I'd vote for isn't the same as yours:lol:
Yes, that doesn't seem the most likely event. ;)

However, at the current trend, in 10 years I will no longer be able to vote for Republicans because they are already "European Center-right" and, to be frank, if I lived in England I'd vote UKIP.
Really? I wouldn't think that UKIP are very much in line with your ideals- they're British conservatives, which means strong support for the state and the authority of the state, as well as the monarchy and the aristocracy, the retention of an unelected upper house, and the power of the government to interfere in the economy in a protectionist and moralistic manner. Any points on which you agree with them are likely points which they have in common with the Classical Liberal wing of the Conservative Party (which is increasingly dominant on a national level).
 
I might be staying home this year.
Good plan.

I might vote just to get the stupid sticker. I'd vote for whoever this guy at work says is locally good, then vote straight Independence ('specially for Governor), and make dick jokes in the write in sections for any sections left over.

I'm awesome at democracy. :smug:
 
I'm probably not actually going to vote because the Congressional + Senate races where I am registered are incredibly lopsided and I have no particular other local interests or causes to be voting for (nothing else really on the ballot)

Also some US states won't have a Senate election at all this year, for those who didn't know, the OP/poll doesn't really recognize that.
 
You are 16!?
You are older than I thought.

15. The inauguration is in 2013. There ya go, I told you. Now, PLEASE don't flame me for being young or I'll report you;)

Yes, that doesn't seem the most likely event. ;)

True...

Really? I wouldn't think that UKIP are very much in line with your ideals- they're British conservatives, which means strong support for the state and the authority of the state, as well as the monarchy and the aristocracy, the retention of an unelected upper house, and the power of the government to interfere in the economy in a protectionist and moralistic manner. Any points on which you agree with them are likely points which they have in common with the Classical Liberal wing of the Conservative Party (which is increasingly dominant on a national level).

Really? Well, I claim to know little about British politics. This is what I know:

Line from many Brits here: "Obama would fit well into the conservative party over here" (Obama is actually seen as pretty far-left by average Americans, at least in terms of American politics with Politicians like Palin and Ron Paul supporting the far economic right in America. Of course, some are more economically radical in either direction.)

I do know the Conservatives are ALWAYS opposed to capital punishment, and while I understand why some people oppose capital punishment USUALLY, how someone could oppose it for a mass murderer who was proven guilty for several murders and rape of children and is basically known to be guilty (I question the odds of getting it wrong twice, but 10 + times?) then I question why you would care for their rights not to suffer as much as possible without outright torture. In any case, that alone wouldn't make me not vote for them, but I don't like it.


They support a government-run health care system and a MUCH bigger welfare state than most Republicans over here do (And even they support too much.;))

And this is ignoring the stuff even the REPUBLICANS screw up entirely on.

I don't know if you know enough to do this accurately (About US politics) but if you do, can you give a basic comparison of David Cameron (The British PM) and Obama. Is Cameron farther right? By how much?

Meh, he's a disillusioned tea partyer anyway.

Actually, technically, I do not belong to ANY political associations. That said, I do approve of the tea party's economic stances.

Now, now. All tea-partyers are disollusioned and then create better illusions to justify their irrational rage.

:lol:

As are all Republicans I presume?;)
 
It doesn't matter if you're young FYI. Keep your head above water, think before posting, etc. and no problems.
 
It doesn't matter if you're young FYI. Keep your head above water, think before posting, etc. and no problems.

Translation: (Forum users, not yours) Agree to become a human sheep, support leftist policies, support "Small l libertarianism" even though we support restrictions on speech and arms...

I'd sooner take the flaming;)

Moderator Action: Trolling. Don't encourage others to misbehave.
Please read the forum rules: http://forums.civfanatics.com/showthread.php?t=422889
 
Me, a human sheep? Please.
Support leftist polices? Right now, not even half of Obama's major things.
Small l libertarianism? I don't group.

....

Just respond to people legitly, think before posting, and so on.
 
Really? Well, I claim to know little about British politics. This is what I know:

Line from many Brits here: "Obama would fit well into the conservative party over here" (Obama is actually seen as pretty far-left by average Americans, at least in terms of American politics with Politicians like Palin and Ron Paul supporting the far economic right in America. Of course, some are more economically radical in either direction.)

I do know the Conservatives are ALWAYS opposed to capital punishment, and while I understand why some people oppose capital punishment USUALLY, how someone could oppose it for a mass murderer who was proven guilty for several murders and rape of children and is basically known to be guilty (I question the odds of getting it wrong twice, but 10 + times?) then I question why you would care for their rights not to suffer as much as possible without outright torture. In any case, that alone wouldn't make me not vote for them, but I don't like it.

They support a government-run health care system and a MUCH bigger welfare state than most Republicans over here do (And even they support too much.;))
To some extent, those issues are diplomatic, a recognition of electoral viability, rather than a strong ideological commitment (for example, the Tories have long advocated the re-privatisation of healthcare, through various means and to varying extents). Also, the death penalty is seen as an authoritarian issue in Europe, and as such is viewed with scepticism by liberals of both the social and classical stripes. The only ones really interested in its resurrection are the ultra-Tories and the fascists, who are both far from libertarian.

I don't know if you know enough to do this accurately (About US politics) but if you do, can you give a basic comparison of David Cameron (The British PM) and Obama. Is Cameron farther right? By how much?
Y'know, it's honestly hard to say- they sit to the left and right of each on different issues, and Cameron's position is somewhat obscured by the stronger influence that the party has on the British Prime Minister than on the US President (unlike a President, a PM can be deposed at a moment's notice). There's also the simple fact that a certain degree of Obama's right-leaning and Cameron's left-leaning lies in their inaction- on gay marriage, for example- rather than either ideological or practical commitment.
A rough guess would suggest that Cameron probably sits a certain distance to the right of Obama, although still within the folds of the Democrat party, and that Obama would sit in the classical liberal wing of the Conservative Party (Cameron, as leader, is naturally one of the more moderate liberals). That said, part of me can't help but feel that Obama's natural inclination would be to liberal (as opposed to social democrat) wing of the the Liberal Democrats, a position which is not really viable at the national level of US politics, but that might just be sentimentalism on my part.
 
Me, a human sheep? Please.

Actually, I would consider you an exception to that rule;)

Support leftist polices? Right now, not even half of Obama's major things.

Well, if you oppose half of Obama's things, then that's good.

Small l libertarianism? I don't group.

Small l libertarians are basically fake libertarians. They claim to be libertarians except economics but they also oppose liberty on a variety of social issues as well. Big L Libertarians support liberty everywhere. In case you haven't guessed, I am a Big L Libertarian;)
....

Just respond to people legitly, think before posting, and so on.

I always do;)
 
Top Bottom