1. We have added a Gift Upgrades feature that allows you to gift an account upgrade to another member, just in time for the holiday season. You can see the gift option when going to the Account Upgrades screen, or on any user profile screen.
    Dismiss Notice

Who IS Going to Win the Republican Primary

Discussion in 'Off-Topic' started by GhostWriter16, Aug 18, 2011.

?

Who IS going to win the GOP Primaries?

  1. Mitt Romney

    34.7%
  2. Rick Perry

    25.6%
  3. Michelle Bachmann

    3.3%
  4. Ron Paul

    9.9%
  5. Sarah Palin

    0.8%
  6. Rick Sanitorium

    0 vote(s)
    0.0%
  7. Tim Pawlenty

    0.8%
  8. Gary Johnson

    1.7%
  9. Donald Trump

    0 vote(s)
    0.0%
  10. Somebody Else

    3.3%
  11. The Radioactive MONKEYS!

    7.4%
  12. Downtown, nevermind that he's a Democrat...

    12.4%
  1. emzie

    emzie wicked witch of the North

    Joined:
    Jul 5, 2004
    Messages:
    20,864
    Location:
    Ottawa, Ontario
    Romney will collapse and Huntsmann will swoop in to eat up moderate support.

    Or so I can hope.
     
  2. zjl56

    zjl56 Emperor

    Joined:
    Apr 23, 2004
    Messages:
    1,242
    Location:
    Iowa
    Ya.. There is a large group of people that think no matter what happens, Romney is a for sure win. They said that about Romney the last time, and Romney has been almost deathly silent despite all the recent politics. Romney is entrenching himself in New Hampshire, but Rick Perry is a serious contender who would probably win Iowa and South Carolina if they were held today..
     
  3. madviking

    madviking north american scum

    Joined:
    May 22, 2005
    Messages:
    11,337
    Gender:
    Female
    Location:
    flavortown
    I could dig it if Bachmann or Perry won.
     
  4. Ajidica

    Ajidica High Quality Person

    Joined:
    Nov 29, 2006
    Messages:
    20,278
    Not sure. At the moment I would have to say it is neck and neck between Bachmann, Romney, and Perry. Bachmann has the nutjobs, Romney has the 'moderate's, and Perry has the capacity to be a hybrid and siphon away a signifigant number of votes, or fail to gain enough traction on the national stage once the media start picking apart his record.

    Hoestly, neck and neck. I would love a Bachmann presidency just for the sheer laughs it would create. (And UK might annex us because we demonstrated that despite some sucesses, we are still ignorant colonials who shouldn't be trusted with a country.)
     
  5. Cutlass

    Cutlass The Man Who Wasn't There.

    Joined:
    Jan 13, 2008
    Messages:
    46,475
    Location:
    US of A
    What does that even mean? This has nothing to do with Obama. If the Republicans are stupid enough to nominate Perry or Bachman, then they're screwing themselves.
     
  6. Akkon888

    Akkon888 한국 사람

    Joined:
    Mar 20, 2009
    Messages:
    358
    Location:
    서울
    Some of them just are stupid enough, as you say it.

    Many southern, religious republicans will never vote for Romney. I'd say that their hatred towards Mormonism is so great that they would rather check Perry/Bachmann's name than vote for Romney.

    History repeats itself. It's too early to call, but I have a feeling that either:
    -If Perry wins (which I believe is likely) Obama will win independents and center/right voters who dislike the radical agenda.
    -If Romney wins (which can happen, but I think it is less likely) a large number of Tea Party members will abstain or vote for some other person.

    People who neglect history are doomed to repeat it.
     
  7. Ajidica

    Ajidica High Quality Person

    Joined:
    Nov 29, 2006
    Messages:
    20,278
    If Perry wins, I could see Obama really struggling. His base is nowhere as enthusiastic as it was in '08 and Perry does have a substantial track record behind him and he has the ability to say "I make jobs" on a level suitable enough to pundits to yell at each other in 30 second soundbites.
     
  8. Miles Teg

    Miles Teg Nuclear Powered Mentat

    Joined:
    Oct 19, 2006
    Messages:
    5,817
    Location:
    One Flag Short of a Theme Park
    Rick Perry and Mitt Romney are the only two serious contenders. Personally, I'd lay odds on Perry.
     
  9. Cutlass

    Cutlass The Man Who Wasn't There.

    Joined:
    Jan 13, 2008
    Messages:
    46,475
    Location:
    US of A

    Downtown has been pretty convincing that the Mormon angle isn't having the negative effect it could once be expected to have. :dunno:
     
  10. civplayah

    civplayah phantasm

    Joined:
    Sep 3, 2007
    Messages:
    3,832
    Location:
    Oregon
    I like Ron Paul a lot but he's probably not going to win.
     
  11. Omega124

    Omega124 Challenging Fate

    Joined:
    Nov 1, 2008
    Messages:
    7,068
    Gender:
    Female
    Location:
    Albany, New York
    And thus he will.

    If this was '06-07, Obama didn't look like he had a chance, and look where we're at.
     
  12. Ajidica

    Ajidica High Quality Person

    Joined:
    Nov 29, 2006
    Messages:
    20,278
    Ron Paul is a perrenial candidate. The reason he is getting traction this time around outside of his devoted fan base, is that a bunch of people are fed up with the current economic policies (which is justified) and haven't don't understand economics well enough to know why Paul's ideas are so terrible to the economy and America.

    Moving outside the economic areas, all Obama/any candidate has to do to sink Paul is to bring up the Civil Rights Act group of laws. On the national stage Paul will go down faster then a submarine equipped with screen doors instead of pressure hatches. Dredging up some tired old dixiecrat talking point works on the state level, not at the national stage were the focus of the nation, and the world, is on you!
     
  13. Miles Teg

    Miles Teg Nuclear Powered Mentat

    Joined:
    Oct 19, 2006
    Messages:
    5,817
    Location:
    One Flag Short of a Theme Park
    *Forehead Smack*

    Obama never staked out a foreign policy that was completely at odds with his own party's. Obama had actually won statewide office. Obama hadn't run for the nomination before and lost by an embarrassing margin. Basically, Obama did the kind of things plausible nominees do, and didn't do the kind of things candidates like Ron Paul do.

    We've seen this show before, back in '08. Ron Paul is great at attracting a small core of incredibly dedicated supporters. Unfortunately for Paul, you win primaries by rounding up tons of supporters, not a small group of super-fans.
     
  14. Akkon888

    Akkon888 한국 사람

    Joined:
    Mar 20, 2009
    Messages:
    358
    Location:
    서울
    By the first paragraph, one could also assume that Romney is in the same situation as Paul's: a perennial candidate that never seems to clinch the election. Also, by your logic, novel candidates receive an edge over recurring candidates.

    Exactly right.

    But, there is no doubt that Paul will put a dent in the primaries. In 2008, Paul won less than 5% of the votes from all Republican primaries. I'm assured that he will get more than that, a lot more.
     
  15. Cutlass

    Cutlass The Man Who Wasn't There.

    Joined:
    Jan 13, 2008
    Messages:
    46,475
    Location:
    US of A
    Except Romney has only run once before. And the Republicans have often nominated someone who was a runner up in the previous nomination.
     
  16. Miles Teg

    Miles Teg Nuclear Powered Mentat

    Joined:
    Oct 19, 2006
    Messages:
    5,817
    Location:
    One Flag Short of a Theme Park
    You're ignoring the key modifier. Ron Paul didn't just run and lose in '08, he run and lost by an embarrassing margin. Romney was a front runner in the crowded '08 field, and McCain became a national figure when he did surprisingly well against Bush in 2000.

    Romney lost in 2008, but he won in something like a dozen primaries and caucuses. Ron Paul? Placed a weak second in handful of small caucus states
     
  17. The_Tyrant

    The_Tyrant Values Guardian

    Joined:
    Sep 21, 2010
    Messages:
    619
    Why is Donald Trump, Gary Johnson, and Tim Pawlenty listed but not Newt Gingrich?

    Stupid poll.
     
  18. Cutlass

    Cutlass The Man Who Wasn't There.

    Joined:
    Jan 13, 2008
    Messages:
    46,475
    Location:
    US of A
    Newt is the radioactive monkeys option.
     
  19. Archbob

    Archbob Ancient CFC Guardian

    Joined:
    Oct 25, 2000
    Messages:
    11,774
    Location:
    Corporate USA
    Actually my friend(whose a canadian citizen living in Hong Kong) tells me that a lot of foreigners think highly of Bachmann and support her, which I find odd.
     
  20. Whiskey_Lord

    Whiskey_Lord Deity

    Joined:
    Jul 15, 2008
    Messages:
    2,163
    Because Bachmann as president would be a four-year long gag reel?
     

Share This Page