Narz
keeping it real
I was thinking about this the other day, when I had the thought, for the first time in my life, that maybe I won't have children. It surprised me because I'd never considered it as a possibility before.
It certainly makes sense that, in a time of crisis, a human would delay reproduction to a later time but why would it be that some humans seem to have little to no desire to reproduce under at all (I've met quite a few). You'd think billions of years of evolution (hundreds of thousands of human evolution) would instill in us a more insistent desire to make sure we have offspring.
I've thought of a few theories myself. Some of them that might sound a bit hokey and rely on untested ideals I can't seem to articulate very well such as "collective consciousness" and the idea that within a species, perhaps there is a drive even stronger than the individual drive that propels us to maintain the species as a whole (in which case less reproduction would be a good thing). I was reminded of such sort of fish I read about, when about to be in a fight with another fish, the non-dominant one will basically weed himself out, refusing to fight and simply letting himself go off and die rather than try to be sneaky and find a way to mate (or get food, forgot what the goal of the fighting was).
Anyway, just something I was curious about and thought might make for interesting thread discussion.
It certainly makes sense that, in a time of crisis, a human would delay reproduction to a later time but why would it be that some humans seem to have little to no desire to reproduce under at all (I've met quite a few). You'd think billions of years of evolution (hundreds of thousands of human evolution) would instill in us a more insistent desire to make sure we have offspring.
I've thought of a few theories myself. Some of them that might sound a bit hokey and rely on untested ideals I can't seem to articulate very well such as "collective consciousness" and the idea that within a species, perhaps there is a drive even stronger than the individual drive that propels us to maintain the species as a whole (in which case less reproduction would be a good thing). I was reminded of such sort of fish I read about, when about to be in a fight with another fish, the non-dominant one will basically weed himself out, refusing to fight and simply letting himself go off and die rather than try to be sneaky and find a way to mate (or get food, forgot what the goal of the fighting was).
Anyway, just something I was curious about and thought might make for interesting thread discussion.