I think it's understanding your audience. I'm old enough to remember the popular era of "Barbie" & Dolls. Growing up, Barbie commercials aired every 15 minutes, & rarely did they highlight Ken or Male Dolls, they understood the surrogate nature of play, & the differences between sexes.To be honest I don't think saying there are more men than women playing Civ7 is a good argument for why there should be more male black leaders as opposed to female black leaders.
However, you can deduce by common sense that there are more men playing 4X games specifically than women. It's probably not a 90/10 split but it's at least a 60/40 split if we are all being honest.
So that said, why do the black male leaders number Zero to Three to the black female leaders?
If we're being fair there should be at least one, and there are MANY good options. Mansa Musa, Shaka, Haile and so on.
Perhaps the controversy comes because the black female leaders could be considered three 'mediocre' choices (i.e. not top leader choices) BUT there is not one single black male leader under any category, significant, or otherwise.
Also where do you get the idea of a 60/40 split in Male to Female Demographic?