joeycitation
Chieftain
- Joined
- Jan 30, 2025
- Messages
- 19
Cancel Amina for being a supporter of the African slave trade to America, restore Askia. I love Askia by the way because of how he frequently shows up in Civ 5 with the entire world burning behind him and he's like "Sup ur cool, let's be friends."
edit: Quoted the wrong section of your post initially, was primarily responding to this portion "Zazzau was literally was one of the biggest slavers and probably a lot of black American men today can thank Amina for how their ancestors were brought across the Atlantic."
Oh come on lol. Any civilization game is full of leaders/polities that have the blood of thousands to millions on their hands, and often entire cultures and regions of the world. The standard is clearly time and cultural relevance of the atrocities, and while that's inevitably inconsistent in its application if you get into it, that's the reality of a popular video game choosing broadly non-controversial options for a popular audience. Peter and Catherine the Great ruled an empire of majority enserfed peasants, conducted imperialism in central asia and colonization in Siberia and Alaska. By most neutral historical considerations they would be considered far more bloody rulers than Lenin, but nonetheless it is obvious that the former are less controversial choices for the game due to length of time and the more visceral contemporary political and cultural relevance of the legacy of the USSR. This is the first Civ game where the US leaders did not preside over colonization and/or slavery in some capacity.
The Spanish Empire and Queen Isabella are currently in the game, contemporaries of Amina of Zazzau. I haven't seen people say they shouldn't be in the game because of the immense horrors involved in Iberian conquest of the Americas or the construction of the Carribean sugar colonies that were some of the most absurdly brutal slave societies in recorded history. Napolean attempted to invade Haiti to reinstate slavery during their revolution, and yet that is rarely mentioned as a mark on his name compared to what, allegedly being short and mostly succeeding at conquering Europe for a time?
The reality is that these things do not really factor into civ games choice of leaders/civs because if they did, the game couldn't really exist as it does. Leaders/civs have boundaries based on what is unlikely to be politically controversial with a popular audience, regardless of whether or not that controversy is based on a measured and consistent transhistorical evaluation of leaders/states history. And I get it! I'm part of that audience. I will have plenty of fun playing as Isabella of Spain and would be extremely uncomfortable and very suspicious if somehow Franco was a modern Spanish leader, despite the former being deeply involved in what I'd say is inarguably a more bloody and grim part of history.
So I just really, really do not believe the routine of indignation at Amina of Zazzau's involvement in the trans-Saharan slave trade. If people like Napolean and Catherine the Great and George Washington are uncontroversial leadere, it's not whitewashing the horrors of that slavery or of military conquest in general to say that it's pretty obvious any controversy around her is because she's an African woman (besides maybe a spare Igbo nationalist civ fan somewhere that just doesn't like the Hausa in general, lol).
Anyway as far as positive suggestions in line with the thread topic,
-- Toussaint Louverture top of my list
-- Kwame Nkrumah for reasons I layed out in earlier post in thread
-- Zara Yacob I would actually prefer to see over the return of Haile Selassie, just for some variety in Ethiopian leaders and he's an interesting figure
-- Shaka I WOULD agree is almost obligatory as a classic civ leader, but to be fair this game has swerved well away from other classic civ leaders so I hesitate
-- Olaudah Equiano as a wildcard recommendation since the doors open in terms of non-heads of state leaders (would love to see Frederick Douglass as well but we are already at max American leader capacity for years)
Last edited: