blackcatatonic
Queen of Meme
Brazil being in the game and not Portugal is an egregious oversight that needs correcting.
Brazil being in the game and not Portugal is an egregious oversight that needs correcting.
Sumeria and Babylon aren't close enough;
Cree aren't almost the same;
'Portugal is not important' is a statement that only makes sense in the present tense;
There being enough Greece relates little with Byzantium;
Central America should not be represented by the Aztecs only.
3rd DLC? Do you mean XP? Cause there's been more than 3 DLCs so far?Babylon should be in the 3rd DLC because its the only of the original civs since Civ1 that is missing.
Yeah I meant XP3rd DLC? Do you mean XP? Cause there's been more than 3 DLCs so far?
I am 1,000% on board with this. In my opinion Religious Victory is the dullest, least fun victory type in Civ VI. It's just get a religion, build a couple of key wonders to help move things along, then vomit apostles all over the world. And aside from a couple of tweaks and small additions here and there, the religion system in Civ VI remains largely unchanged since launch. Now, that's not to say I consider there to be anything wrong at all with the base religion system as far as getting a religion and choosing beliefs and whatnot is concerned. But that doesn't mean Firaxis couldn't still give the whole thing an overhaul and make Religious Victory far more compelling. After all, Gathering Storm changed up the process for the Science Victory, gave Culture Victory the Rock Band, Domination the GDR, and brought Diplo Victory back from Civ V. Religious Victory got nothing.So... what if the big theme of the possible third expansion isn't health, or plagues/diseases, or economic victory (not, of course, to say some of those might not also feature)... but a big religion revamp, featuring a Reformation mechanic, among other things?
So... what if the big theme of the possible third expansion isn't health, or plagues/diseases, or economic victory (not, of course, to say some of those might not also feature)... but a big religion revamp, featuring a Reformation mechanic, among other things?
Well by those criteria, the alt from the 3rd expansion should be Elizabeth the First, as she's the only one of the original leaders since Civ 1 that is missing. All of the other 5 timers are in the game already.
For anyone unsure of Portuguese influence on world trade, this is a good read: https://www.amazon.com/Taste-Conquest-Three-Great-Cities/dp/0345480848
They belong in Civ.
Can anyone tell me in what matter Firaxis dropped the DLCs in the past? I wasn't active in this lovely place when they were announced, so I skipped the whole marketing cycle around them. I still haven't lost hope we're getting something before Xmas.
In Civ 5 and 6 DLC was the first wave of content after launch of the base game and before the XP dropped
It's not finished yet.the omission is like speaking of the cold war without speaking about Russia (cause you know, they did not come out as winners in the end)...
Thanks, I thought the DLCs dropped between R&F and GS. Anyway, was there any indication of what's gonna drop before it did?
You mean we hope/anticipate there are ways to test things like thatFiraxis is not currently showing any DLC in the works on SteamDB, but there are ways for them to test things without it appearing on the website.
corkscrewlike shade in blurred picture is concept art of a new leader