pineappledan
Deity
that is far too bizarre and conspiratorial a question to merit a serious response.Let me ask this then,
Why is the culture and golden age bonus from baths considered to be the best "counterweight" for the superior wells? I'm not arguing for change for change's sake, I am honestly very curious about why culture is the buffed yield. Does the early power spike of wells always lead to a culture lead and thus is balanced out by culture from baths?
And why is culture chosen instead of science? If baths were +10% science during GA (or WLTKD) instead, would players complain that progress is sub-optimal on non-freshwater starts?
Yes, there should be advantages to non-freshwater cities but I think using baths to tip the scales of balance is arbitrary and interferes with GA and culture. Culture is widely accepted as the top priority yield, in fact the #1 advice that veterans often have for newcomers is to prioritize culture and production over food and science. It strikes me as contradictory to then have baths locked out for half of cities
You basically said “baths are bad and arbitrary because they do [describes what baths do], and that’s bad because culture is good”
...okay. You’ve failed to even lay out an argument for why more culture on river cities is a bad idea except to say that culture is a thing. Yes, I can confirm that potential culture generation is the main reward right now for settling on rivers. No, I can’t defend any argument for why it should be any other way because no counterproposal or material criticism has been offered for why it should be different.
Last edited: