I've always thought of Angkor Wat as one of the best wonders in the game.
It's easily one of the worst. The bonus is pretty small.
I've always thought of Angkor Wat as one of the best wonders in the game.
well the Temple of Artemis is THE best wonder in the game BUILD IT OR SUFFER DEFEAT.I've always thought of Angkor Wat as one of the best wonders in the game.
One day I am going to play Shoshone and get that wonder.
it comes at a time when a lot of really good important buildings become available so I build them than comes Sistine Chapel, Leaning Tower and other good wonders. also its when I hit the mid-game happiness wall so I construct happiness buildings as well.I never build Ankor Wat
I think it just comes at a time when if I want to try for a wonder there are others that are much more beneficial.
Never built the Terracotta Army, like.. ever
Rarely Stonehenge and the Great Lighthouse..
Thing is with Angkor Wat it comes at Education, so you have to delay a university to get it.
Also there are far far better Wonders just over the horizon. You are better focusing on that university so you can get to either the Sistine Chapel, Leaning Tower or Forbidden City.
Those wonders will help you win a game, not Ankor Wat.
Plus the AI loves building it too...
It would be worthwhile if it was "25% cost for getting tiles with gold/culture" instead of "-25% cost"
(the problem is with its weird interaction with the Krepost/ America's UA which I think is why they didn't make it worthwhile)
Really don't get the antipathy and disdain for Angkor Wat.
You guys have never had that aluminum, oil, uranium, or coal resource you are just waiting for your city's borders to expand to?
You've never needed to plant a late game city somewhere so you could get oil, and said to yourself "Well if I put it here it would sorta be an ok city, but it's going to be a long, long time before I get my oil, since I wouldn't be able to buy that tile if I put it here. Hmmmm"
Guess it depends on why you play the game. I'd really rather build my gigantic cities and spam wonders than conquer the world directly.
Plus Angkor Wat has great engineer points. My favorite kind of game is one where I can snag a couple of the early wonders that give them. Even with the counter advancing I sometimes get in the situation where I get a continuous stream of great engineers, which I spend on more and more wonders (stressing the ones that give great engineer points). If you are careful with the specialists you can really get ridiculous with the the whole thing.
Of course I would never play on higher difficulties. The attraction of this game to me is what I can build. Going up to an arbitrary higher difficulty and losing the ability to build any wonders doesn't interest me at all. I mean I've watched Let's Play videos: "Wonders are the devil. Don't build wonders. They are a waste of two or three hammers. Fill out Tradition, then go Rationalism. If you want a wonder, hope it was built by a neighboring Civ, then conquer it like Sid intended. There is nothing but science. Science and beakers are everything. Don't waste time, get two cities out, then build National College. Blah, blah, blah."
I don't want to play your game. They actually look boring and pretty repetitive to me.
Yeah, your point about the wonders is valid.
But in the end I have a city of wonders. And my lands look terrific.