1. We have added a Gift Upgrades feature that allows you to gift an account upgrade to another member, just in time for the holiday season. You can see the gift option when going to the Account Upgrades screen, or on any user profile screen.
    Dismiss Notice

Worst military commander-who is the worst general?

Discussion in 'World History' started by LOLZ, Oct 11, 2007.

  1. LOLZ

    LOLZ Chieftain

    Joined:
    Dec 14, 2006
    Messages:
    15
    Location:
    Cleveland,Ohio,USA,NorthAmerica
    HI, who do you think is the worst military commander in world history?
     
  2. FoxURA

    FoxURA Warlord

    Joined:
    Jan 20, 2006
    Messages:
    261
    Whichever military leader planned France's defenses to hold back a potential German invasion :D.
     
  3. Azale

    Azale Deity

    Joined:
    Jun 29, 2002
    Messages:
    18,723
    Location:
    Texas
    Kim Il Sung and any head general of the North before Grant.
     
  4. ParkCungHee

    ParkCungHee Deity

    Joined:
    Aug 13, 2006
    Messages:
    12,921
    Heinrich Himmler. Man built a defensive line running West to East against the Russians, with the front running North to South.
     
  5. Eran of Arcadia

    Eran of Arcadia Stormin' Mormon Retired Moderator

    Joined:
    Oct 16, 2004
    Messages:
    23,090
    Gender:
    Male
    Location:
    The Sunshine and Lettuce Capital of the World
    Frederick Stopford; he was way too old and too cautious to be commanding a force at Gallipoli, he slept through the landings and refused to command his men forward at a point where it would have made a huge difference in the campaign.
     
  6. pawpaw

    pawpaw Now Farve-Proof

    Joined:
    Mar 27, 2003
    Messages:
    5,229
    Location:
    u.s.a
    Sir Douglas Haig--sent 100,000's of British troop into what was basicly a swamp ( British bombardment had destroyed the nateral drainage ) at Ypre's. One of his aids went to the front and stated " We are sending our men into that? " Haig had NEVER been to the Western Front lines and had no idea what the trenches looked like.
     
  7. Eran of Arcadia

    Eran of Arcadia Stormin' Mormon Retired Moderator

    Joined:
    Oct 16, 2004
    Messages:
    23,090
    Gender:
    Male
    Location:
    The Sunshine and Lettuce Capital of the World
    I would dispute that Haig was really one of the worst, though. At that point, there was little else that could be done effectively and there was pressure to produce results. Given the circumstances no one else would have done much better.
     
  8. Adler17

    Adler17 Prussian Feldmarschall

    Joined:
    Jun 10, 2003
    Messages:
    5,341
    Location:
    Schleswig- Holstein. Germany
    I would also nominate Haig. I mean he could have stopped it and attacked on another location. Anyway he was responsible for the worst casualities in British history and truly deserved a Pour le Mérite!

    Adler
     
  9. pawpaw

    pawpaw Now Farve-Proof

    Joined:
    Mar 27, 2003
    Messages:
    5,229
    Location:
    u.s.a
    Well the attack went on for @ 4 months when it was know they couldn't achive their objectives @ 2 weeks into the attacks. Cost 310,000 English their lifes.
     
  10. privatehudson

    privatehudson The Ultimate Badass

    Joined:
    Oct 15, 2003
    Messages:
    4,796
    If you're referring to the role of Commander in Chief I'm not sure Winfield Scott could be described as a bad commander, after all the Annacona plan was essentially put into practice and it can be argued that the cumulative effects of its two main aims dealt the Confederacy heavy blows. MacLellan was hardly an amazing field commander but he did turn the motley collection of troops outside Washington into the Army of the Potomac through effective organisation and training. Halleck continued this process of training and equiping the vast numbers of volunteers and conscripts, again hardly a brilliant field or strategy commander but at least of some use.

    I doubt I would consider any of those three as candidates for the worst general ever as all had some saving grace.
     
  11. warpus

    warpus In pork I trust

    Joined:
    Aug 28, 2005
    Messages:
    50,588
    Location:
    Stamford Bridge
    Surely the worst of the worst are not even remembered in the annals of history.

    The worst you can think of will be the worst.. of the best.
     
  12. pawpaw

    pawpaw Now Farve-Proof

    Joined:
    Mar 27, 2003
    Messages:
    5,229
    Location:
    u.s.a
    Maclellan doesn't get enough credit for turning 100,000 volunteers and rabble into a real army--acourse as far as using that army..........
     
  13. privatehudson

    privatehudson The Ultimate Badass

    Joined:
    Oct 15, 2003
    Messages:
    4,796
    Yeah his use of troops was hardly anything to write home about. I think Lincoln summed MacCellan's campaigns best when he called the Army of the Potomac "MacCellan's Bodyguard" :lol:
     
  14. FriendlyFire

    FriendlyFire Codex WMDicanious

    Joined:
    Jan 4, 2002
    Messages:
    19,512
    Location:
    Sydney
    MacCellan would get the award for the SLOWEST General.
    Even when he got hold of the three cigars he just had to procrastrinate.
    (The horses were tired ... was my favourite of the excuses to Lincon)
     
  15. privatehudson

    privatehudson The Ultimate Badass

    Joined:
    Oct 15, 2003
    Messages:
    4,796
    Unfortunately with the notable exception of Pope (and briefly Burnside) most of the commanders in the East tended to be cautious in the extreme, causing no end of annoyance to Lincoln and later Grant.
     
  16. ParkCungHee

    ParkCungHee Deity

    Joined:
    Aug 13, 2006
    Messages:
    12,921
    Why Kim Il Sung?
     
  17. Joe Harker

    Joe Harker 1st in the Premiership!

    Joined:
    Aug 31, 2006
    Messages:
    2,812
    Location:
    Coventry!
    Lord Lucan who sent the Light Brigade torwards the turkish cannons
     
  18. Case

    Case The horror, the horror

    Joined:
    Oct 25, 2000
    Messages:
    1,884
    Location:
    Canberra, Australia
    I agree: the worst military commander in history was probably the leader of a tribe or kingdom who inherited the job and got his force totally wiped out through sheer stupidity. Professional soldiers who rise through the ranks of militaries have to be at least vaugely successul to get promoted and achieve command (for instance, Haig is generally regarded as being a successful Corps commander).
     
  19. Adler17

    Adler17 Prussian Feldmarschall

    Joined:
    Jun 10, 2003
    Messages:
    5,341
    Location:
    Schleswig- Holstein. Germany
    Well for some like Bazaine political influence made them to generals. That should not be forgot, too.
    Others on this list could be:
    - Bazaine: Commander of the French Rhine Army during the Franco- German war of 1870/71. Did not take any initiative, was beaten at Vionville by a lonely German corps, retreated and eventually surrendered at Metz.
    - Czar Nicholas II.: Lost ww1 in the East due to his stupidity and stubbornness.
    - General William Elphinston: Due to his lack of taking the initative and believing wrong promisses he lead his forces into doom in the first Anglo- Afghan war.
    - Adolf Hitler: Shall I add anything here?
    - Josef W. Stalin: If Hitler is listed he has to, too. He was only so clever to give his generals finally free hand.
    - Major General Aitken: The man who tried to conquer Tanga in 1914...

    I could remember more later.

    Adler
     
  20. privatehudson

    privatehudson The Ultimate Badass

    Joined:
    Oct 15, 2003
    Messages:
    4,796
    Whichever Prussian was in charge of the mess that was Auerstadt deserves special mention. When the main body of your army is driven from the field by a single enemy corps which it heavily outnumbers you know you're in trouble.
     

Share This Page