Yeah, if we have Scotland (which is pretty much certain), it's very probable that we will be getting William Wallace as their leader. One of the reasons why I would have preferred the Celts as a whole, but anyway, Scotland is happening...
It could very well be Robert the Bruce also, who would play the same way as Wallace but also being an actual leader. I've already grown kind of fond of possibly getting just Scotland anyway.
You realize that is exactly what is going to happen when one of the last 3 is going to be First Look Mapuche, right?Imagine the rest of the world wake up to see a YouTube video titled First Look: Mutapa.
As exotic and interesting as it can, I'd argue that will probably leads to the doom of Civilization 6. We have enough backlash already from Georgia. Outside here/reddit, people were disappointed and sarcastically commented "coming up next! First Look: <some obscure civ (I don't remember too)>", et cetera.
That was Georgia. A real country name (that we learned during school geography), that share a name with modern US state and some European ruler/placenames...
Personally, I've never heard of Mutapa before you mentioned it here.. and naming it Zimbabwe, might, might make it more recognizable (mostly due to its meme-like currency, at least here).. but let's not take any more risk. We have enough obscure civ/leader (in non-CF/Reddit term): Georgia, Cree, Maurya. Let's the next 3 be civilization we all familiar with to boost sales
(like Inca, Ottoman and Mali ._. - hey one can still wish despite Mapuche/Zulu/Scotland is coming)
Then Shaka and William Wallace leading Scotland will make them love the game again.
Speaking of revealing oneself, is it just me or does Firaxis have a hard time finding men who wear shirts?The drum beats are getting louder and louder and are almost deafening now.
Reveal yourself, Shaka!
I mean, Gilgamesh, Gandhi, Chandragupta, Mvemba a Nzinga, Jayavarman, and Montezuma are all at least partly shirtless and Alexander is wearing a sculpted breastplate.
Speaking of revealing oneself, is it just me or does Firaxis have a hard time finding men who wear shirts?
I would also prefer someone like Robert the Bruce for Scotland, but I'm betting it will be William Wallace.
Except at least three of them are middle aged or older and one of them is...rotund.Obviously they are targeting the female audience.
But I mean, if troll-face Gandhi floats your boat... 
Except at least three of them are middle aged or older and one of them is...rotund.
He is just imitating Buddha, that's all. 
He's actually one of my favorite leader models; I don't get why people hate him.Are you callling Javvy rotund?
Heh, as far as I am concerned nobody needs to wear a shirt.Obviously they are targeting the female audience.
Wasn't Siddhartha supposedly skinny?Are you callling Javvy rotund?
Except at least three of them are middle aged or older and one of them is...rotund.
Well if they want realistic, body hair is part of the picture (as is different body types/weights). Not a big deal with animated characters to not have body hair, and it's not like they are really aiming to be that realistic anyway.I'd say he's more 'dad bod' than rotund. It's in these days
It was similar in Civ 5: Monty and Gandhi never wear shirts (nor Shaka for that matter), Hiawatha, Kamehameha, Pacal, Gajah. I guess they figure you are from somewhere tropical and pre-industrial age (or Gandhi!) you apparently always want some good air circulation.
They seem to have a shirtless but no-body hair rule. I wonder if there's a long email thread somewhere firaxis's servers debating whether or not to model underarm hair.
You're making me really despair at the state of education when you suggest that the Cree or Chandragupta Maurya are "obscure."
