Seon
Not An Evil Liar
OOC: Their proof of being ethically sound often comes in the type of burning everyone that they say is ethically unsound, such as the group of people who claim that the Church is ethically unsound.
Arent' you blaming someone here? You weren't the only one to advise the Regency to take over the nukes...However, parceling blame around does not revive dead infantry units. (...)
And contrary to some popular opinion Duscha was not in control of the networks at the start of the year.
Arent' you blaming someone here? You weren't the only one to advise the Regency to take over the nukes...
I was saying that you counted the cost of lost infantry which was generally acknowledged to be mostly useless. It's not clear whether replacing it is necessary, therefore unclear whether the amount of lost money is needed.
diamondeye said:OOC: I honestly don't see the big deal in reclamation either. I mean, if anyone finds the sceptre, they are going to keep it for themselves. Those things are probably worth waging war for.
Would you care to elaborate? What in Klorinheim hindered what plan? Or do you mean Hubbard?Indeed. Sadly, events on Klorinheim destroyed the chance that Garrison had in developing magical troops that could teleport explosives directly into the hives. So we shall go for a consolation prize, although I would appreciate it if a magic-capable noble house can assist the garrison's magic development.
Would you care to elaborate? What in Klorinheim hindered what plan? Or do you mean Hubbard?
House Tsedeq could bring a pair of thaumaturg Charoum covens with access to air mana to Hubbard if the Garrison needs them. They are limited, but might help a tiny bit in a support role. We could also develop a new coven with access to body magic that could help regeneration and recuperation facilities in addition to air or enchantment magic (the latter might provide some kind of automation on otherwise inanimate objects although I'm unsure how effective that could be), but that would take 2 years and some funding (1 year to develop the project, another to build them).
House Klorin would like to know why the Churches and the Guilds are opposed to the Legal Transfer of a scepter?
Not recognizing our basic ownership of it is de facto and de jure approval of theft, assault and murder. With their moral high ground of burning girls for being a bit late to report wrongdoings the Church might not want to encourage assassinations, banditry and immoral oppertunism.
It is good to reduce the number of freemen by providing them for them. It is questionable to scavenge the Western Authority continent when there is no owner (though it is true times are dire), but it is outright scandalous to aid and abet assassinations, warfare, banditry and piracy by acknowleding illegal transfers of property, especially property bound to the lives of people, noble people!
Or perhaps we should not recognize that Grimkill's scepter should go to the guilds? Is it first come, first serve? Is it a Darwinian battlefield, or do we live in a society
Do we know whether the evvis have started bonding one of thier own?
Could the Evvis bond to one? And if so, do they get to vote in elections?
Could the Evvis bond to one? And if so, do they get to vote in elections?