If it is Maria II, so we will have for the fisrt time on civ history brothers as leaders. Dom Pedro II is her young brother.
Let me reiterate: Palácio de Belém has no water near it as it sits atop the peak of the Arrábida mountain range. If there is water, it has to be the Torre de Belém. And if you exclude Maria I's madness, how was the Braganza dynasty marked by it and sadness? There was the earthquake of Lisbon in 1755 which sent the kingdom into poverty until this day, along with the loss of Brazil as a part of the empire in 1822. But madness? Firaxis, care to explain?
I'm all for Pedro's caipirinha, but a good amount of Porto wine could change my opinion.
Uh, didn't Maria II die during childbirth, also losing the baby? Sounds pretty tragic to me.
Upon closer inspection, the supposed "water" in the background does look more like flat land viewed from up high.
Tragic events don't automatically make a person mad. I'm feeling slightly insulted at the moment that Firaxis chose to label the entire fourth dynasty of my country's monarchy as mad, if the civ in question really is Portugal.
Let me reiterate: Palácio de Belém has no water near it as it sits atop the peak of the Arrábida mountain range. If there is water, it has to be the Torre de Belém. And if you exclude Maria I's madness, how was the Braganza dynasty marked by it and sadness? There was the earthquake of Lisbon in 1755 which sent the kingdom into poverty until this day, along with the loss of Brazil as a part of the empire in 1822. But madness? Firaxis, care to explain?
Your reaction sounds a bit funny. Don't be that sensitive!
Why would you exclude her madness?
It is indeed marked by corruption and not only because of Collor, we had scandals with every presidentHow would you feel if someone decided that the republican period of Brazil was marked by corruption just because Collor de Melo was once the president for two years?