Recent content by KHM

1) "To keep your cities clean of any non-state religion": You can't do that in the holy city of the specific religion. YES, this is typically outweighed by the benefits of the shrine, but the point is: you can't purge it. 2) Botanic testing stations. I always play at marathon: - Until now...

Undocumented feature of 1.9.7: Content of botanic test stations reworked. Great!

This reminds me - I think I will add +2 happy to every holy-city-wonder. It should still be desirably to "invent" any available (!) religion, and you can't remove a religion out of its holy city (Can you?). Of course if would be better to "add 2 happy faces if this religion is not your...

Woohooo! This list of changes is just GREAT!!! Nearly Everything that was broken is fixed, more than expected for sure. I've waited so long for this patch, but now... worms incoming!

I for myself am completely satisfied with the existing colors. They also fit to: - the novels - the westwood games (which form a solid experience for many gamers) - ???

It seems that you had the same faction twice (you were Irulan => House Corinno), AND you had a corinno Ally. If I'm right, then that's the reason. Dune wars is NOT designed for having factioned twice.

IMHO they are mainly the counterpart to the quad for Fremen, whose can't build vehicles. Compare: - Strength 4 instead of 5 + 10 % bonus against cities intead of 35 % malus in cities + defensive bonuses from terrain (-) needs water debt resource (no problem for fremen) + light...

I won't argue against that. Having multiple "religions" / political beliefs / whatever SHOULD hurt you. I just wanted to propose an additional civic that lets you REDUCE (not eliminate) this penalty. And I don't see this has to be anti-canonical under all circumstances. And of course this...

I don't agree to that to full extent: - IMHO til now, Dune Wars always weighened gameability against flavor and tried to unite those two, but whenever this was not entirely possible, gameability got the lead. - I didn't say the civic shall be named "religious freedom". The lore of the Bene...

Maybe there should be a civic (like religious freedom) which decreases the penalty to -1 unhappy per non-state-religion. Or even to zero or to a flat rate, it depends on the cost of the civic and of the other (alternative) civics you can't pick then.

I agree with Ahriman, especially with and with "It's great that you're giving this a go."

1) Add Atreides Sonic Tank - Ahriman's suggestion: lower strength medium scorpion, but with collateral damage. The Atreides are already better than average in the bombers department, so they become really good at the collateral damage business, but then - why not? Its definitely flavorful...

I agree with that. A penalty in exchange for the advantages of having multiple religions is surely welcome. I just fear that the AI will have its difficulties with it. I would never call it an 'exploit' against a human player.

Ouch. That would allow for missionaries as weapons - have them join your beliefs and they will rebel as mad. If the AI is bad at using inquisitors, this could be heavily exploited. Will it be possible to turn the penalty off, at least for the AI?

This is good news! :goodjob: Still, I have one question: The old text for Missionaria Protectiva told something about "penalties for having multiple religions". Several posts here in the forum brought up this, too. But I never noticed such a penalty in the game itself (currently 1.9.6). Did I...