Recent content by Ziggy Stardust

Me too. But just going: "this is lawfare", is not a challenge. It can be countered with: "no it's not". Both positions providing the same amount of support and evidence. I would welcome evidence to support the challenge of the consensus. But none is coming, asking for it is deemed to be...

How about Russia?

https://washingtonmonthly.com/2024/04/07/introduction-who-got-more-done/

The 2017 Trump Tax Law Households with incomes in the top 1 percent will receive an average tax cut of more than $60,000 in 2025, compared to an average tax cut of less than $500 for households in the bottom 60 percent, according to the Tax Policy Center (TPC).[1] As a share of after-tax income...

No you can't.

Oldest trick in the book. When other people are offended they're snowflakes looking to be insulted. When someone asks to provide an argument to a statement on a discussion forum it's: Forsooth! Your words have insulted me good sir, I will take my leave! And then frantically start googling for...

https://apnews.com/article/060ca2399a744b4a9554dbd2ec276a90

"This is a fraud on the American public. This is an embarrassment to our country. We were getting ready to win this election. Frankly, we did win this election. "

This time it was the victim routine. No support was provided. None ever is.

What a load of bollocks.

Lets hear why. Give us some facts and evidence why this is the case. You won't. Because you can't. That is always the case. You just claim and when pressed you dodge and escape into vagueries. You all do.

Lets see if that registers

Imagine that. No answer to this one. Odd.

Can you tell me which of the indictments are politically motivated? Is it better to skirt around it? Alright. I apoligize for directly addressing you and I'll change my statement to: Those who believe the Trump indictments are politically motivated are usefulllll idiots. Better? :)

What is the irony? That you judge on spelling mistakes? Yeah ... that is in fact irony.