Search results

Remember Detroit and/or Motorcity from the 90’s? Well listen up then! For all those car nuts that have been looking for a game where you can setup a car company, and design your own cars from scratch in super detailed way, and then start producing and selling them, here’s Automation...

The MG or gatling will never have indirect fire.

In this thread we had some discussion about UU's unique abilities and should they or should they not keep those UA's after upgrade. I said that the UA should not pass on after the upgrade because of couple of things, the AI being one of those reasons. Well, how does the G&K handle this "problem"?

Well they propably did not consider themselves literally as "Finnish". But since there is a huge difference between Swedish and Finnish languages and Finnish language is actually very old, I would say that the Finnish people in 17th century did certainly know that they are not Swedish (nor...

Allright! Is there any info about it and if there is, then where can I find this info? EDIT: Im pretty exited for Sweden because we obviously cant ever have Finland in civ game (yes I know Helsinki is a city state but you know what I mean) so Sweden is culturally the closest civ to Finland :).

Has Sweden been confirmed?

No problem at all. Looking back what I wrote, maybe I should of rephrased what I said.

Yeah I know I said that I wont post anymore about this thing, but since it seems like that you have now understood what I tried to say before, I will answer to your critics. ”Military UA” (with regular UA + UU’s of course) would help the AI because then you could code the AI...

What I meant was that we would have this what you called "military UA" and on top of that we would ALSO have unique units. So that we would have BOTH! I will try to be more careful next time I try to explain something in english, but now I will go to sleep because im tired. Good night :).

Obviously you have not understood what I meant. I have not said that UU's should be replaced with a "military AU".

To tell you the truth this is pretty frustrating :sad:. I introduced an idea about a system for a civ game, not particulary for civ5 or for G&K, but maybe for future civ, like civ6. Then it feels like everyone is just nitpicking about some other things, it feels like nobodys truly understanding...

@Drawmeus. My english skills might be far worse than I tought they were, but I really -really- belive that in my previous post I have allready ansered to that.

Not that simple since there is also an AI concern in what I am saying. But pretty close actually, please read on. That is actually a problem. One UU gives bonus right from the start trough out the game and the other UU (as you said it) in many cases forces you to wage war in order to take...

You are doing a great job in missing the whole point. ..but at the same time it would make the whole time span of the civ (for every civ) more unique. You obviously arent thinking outside the box here. Even tough you would have civ specific unit ability, it would not mean that you cant have...

Im sorry but I fail to see how having a civ specific unit ability (or perhaps more like abilities) would necessarily take away the fun from UU’s. I really don’t understand what you are trying to say here. Of course you have to pay for your units, but its not like you will survive...

Arquably the easiest way in balancing these UU’s most likely is that you first remove the forever abilities that some units are enjoying, and THEN try to balance them. If someone is weak then make it stronger, if someone is overpowered then make it weaker. If you need to have some long...

What Maximo the Xth said and also correct me if im wrong, but I dont belive that there ever was a time when cavalry/helicopter could build cities after they were upgraded from conquistador. Now that I have realized that some civs UU’s may actually keep their special abilities trough out...

First of all, its unfair that some civs may keep their unique ability and others dont. It also requires a ton of balancing between early UU's and more late UU's, to tell you the truth I really dont see this massive balancing taking place in Firaxis's design. If there are UU's that are better...

Nobody should be able to carry their UU’s ability trough upgrading trough out the game. After all, it is supposed to be a unique unit. If loosing the unique ability trough upgrading causes problems with one particular unit, then just change that units ability to suit this system better...

Thanks for the tip, but unfortunately I actually DO like to play as England :). I just dont want to have the possibility to have superunits. Oh god. Lets just hope that the developers do actually realize these problems. The AI is allready struggling in combat, It does not help the situation...