Search results

And, to get back on the main thread topic, this was even worse in Fallout 4. Every single thing in the game: "Will you do this task for me out of the kindness of your heart since there's no option to ask my about compensation ahead of time?" A. Yes B. Sarcastic Yes C. No that ends up...

Because I'm a consumer whore idiot who easily buys into hype and marketing.

I never said it was Fallout 4 that caused them to lose my trust. They gained my trust with Morrowind, still one of the best games I have ever played, but it's been pretty much all downhill since then. Oblivion was worse than Morrowind by almost any metric. Fallout 3 was... too different than...

Or, alternatively, good evidence that Paradox doesn't give a rat's ass about single player because they do all of their balancing in multiplayer.

I mean, AT LEAST those of us who play it on PC are getting the upgrade for free. That free upgrade is kind of pointless though since there are Skyrim mods out RIGHT NOW that make the game look better than this will look. The fact that they're charging full new game price of $59.99 for console...

Looks promising but I have a few concerns. Number 1, only 3 factions is pretty disappointing, I just have to hope it sells well enough for expansions to add on to that. Number 2, the thing I hated most about Dawn of War 2 when I tried it back when it first came out was the lack of base...

I'd be more interested in this if it was Warhammer 40K. I've never really been into Warhammer Fantasy much at all.

It looks good, I intend to get it when it goes on sale. I can't justify spending $60 on a game that has multiplayer that I'll never use as part of it's value proposition. From what I've heard the single player campaign is only something like 10-12 hours long, I can get more gameplay time than...

Anyone who wasn't expecting exactly this kind of crap the day they announced that they were acquired from Facebook was absolutely fooling themselves. They are tone-deaf to the community, don't expect it to ever get better. RIP the Occulus Rift. Welcome to the Facebook Market Rift.

I did! I've been giving them hell for their writing ever since Fallout 3.

If we're comparing it to all video games, no, it's not terrible. But single player cRPG's are generally held to a higher standard, one that Bethesda regularly falls well short of.

I think the whole system of limiting how many things you can effectively govern is silly. Sectors should be optional for people who don't want to micromanage stuff, but those who do want to should be able to.

Hmm I'm not sure about this one, it would make the early game even more RNG dependent. It's already too easy to get screwed because you play a peaceful race and end up surrounded by Militaristic Xenophobes, get no mineral deposits in your starting systems, etc. This would just add more of...

IF they sell well. Lot of post-release support for March of the Eagles and Sengoku, was there? FYI, that's confirmed as a bug and is going to be fixed at some point. You are supposed to still have to pay the upkeep for those.

Yeah the construction system is a hot mess. I hope they don't make a DLC out of fixing it, having to pay to fix something that should have worked better in the first place is ridiculous. The modders can probably sort it out. Re: the game's writing. All I can say is no kidding it's bad...

I have to agree with the people saying it looks (graphically) like a mobile game. The aesthetic does resemble CivRev in a lot of ways. Some of the gameplay stuff sounds awesome but the graphical style really isn't doing anything for me at all. Edit: And I'm sure the actual graphics will be...

I actually like Survival Mode, but I have two problems with it: 1.) It should also make ammo/stims more scarce. Before I even left Sanctuary for the first time I already had a pile of ammo and medicine that has only grown since then. 2.) Not being able to save anywhere is basically...

This game is so great so far. I've always preferred space based 4x games over historical ones, and Paradox's grand strategy style really suits the genre. It helps that the game has fantastic writing which helps big time with the buy-in. I couldn't believe the game was only $40, it's fleshed...

I'll get the Vive over the Rift for one reason and one reason alone: I refuse to financially support the Rift's closed platform shenanigans. I do NOT want VR to go the way of home consoles with exclusives all over the place, I want the Vive's open platform philosophy to win. For that reason...

Right I probably won't get one until fall at least, I don't have $800 to just drop at a moment's notice like that, I'll have to save up for it a bit.