Search results

I think war elephants are cool. Removing them is being overly focused on "balance" and "cleanness" to make the game boring. A resource can give benefits other than just yields. It's more interesting and provides strategic depth.

I think it's a misinterpretation to say that they are bad for balancing because you are misinterpreting their use. Ideology tenets are not policies. This is very important. For a policy in a policy tree, it *must* be taken to complete the tree. Meanwhile it is incredibly rare that every single...

No, I think DPs, friendships, and other diplo statuses are obviously off the table, other than revealing a sneak attack which is already possible. The AI relies very heavily on that info and so do humans. It would be impossible to tell if someone likes you. Instead things like Wonder Progress...

About asymmetrical AI info: you could display an ambiguous "tech lead" instead of the exact amount of techs. ex. With the current system you see they have 22 techs. With the new system you see "technology: very ahead" or "ahead", etc. Then when you place a spy you see the exact amount. Then...

I like the idea. I loked the data that you suggested but didn't use in your actual proposal though. Like the number/type of military units. Another idea is what tech they are currently researching (or just somehow view their top panel). The question is how do you make a UI for this.

whoops, somehow didn't notice that, fixed. Download the new version, it is savegame compatible.

fix gold being added in every city

I added this feature by giving the gold cost, which is not always entirely accurate but it is in most cases. Though it also means if you have very little gold you can't convert your TR.

Converting the unit now costs/gives gold based on unit cost. This feature can be disabled by editing convert.lua

updated with N. Core's version. Thanks a lot, I didn't know about unique caravans.

Changing TR from land/sea works for UU TR units

My mods are working (in my signature). This list will probably get out of date pretty quickly though.

Less fiddly micromanaging. I should be choosing between things that have a big effect on gameplay, not +/- one yield. Civ6 districts come to mind. Elegant design with emergent complexity is amazing, though it's very difficult in a game like civ so I don't fault the devs :)

Well not all mods need to be updated. Really the only reason the mod would need to be updated is if a feature that the mod uses was changed. Now, people often play with big mods that use a lot of features, and the VP congress has led to more features changing, so it is pretty common to have...

It takes your founded religion or the religion of your capital. Yeah, you can just steal the normal beliefs for byzantine. I wasn't sure if I should make the UA have a special case for byzantium. Because it is byzantium's UA to have those beliefs, and it would give more incentives to conquer...

I think it is, in most cases this is not possible as the save won't load with different mods. And most people won't even try. I don't see why not, if someone really really can't do it, they can just say so and we do it the old way. I'm sure github can handle it, especially if old issue files...

VP is much more balanced than vanilla. Unlike vanilla, yields other than science and food matter. Science is still good, but the other yields are balanced to be as powerful.

I'm not sure why you think progress is OP. I think maybe it's just the archipelago map, with few border conflicts, there will be less aggression.

Well, I hate to say I told you so... But jokes aside looks like good changes, I mean no one expected it to be perfect first try. I mean, even every two months might be too quick. I think back in *the before times* changes probably happened at about a 3 month schedule. Maybe I'm just slow though.

@TadhgEomonn fixed. Everyone please install the latest version, it should be savegame compatible. The bug was just something accidentally added when I made the last update.