ToddMarshall
Maniac - Stellar Wingman
I disagree strongly with this. It maxes factories in 2 turns, or in 1 turn if we feed it reserves. And even if it weren't, it'd be like getting free money. Reserves can be produced efficiently at either Dolz or Beta Ceti (doesn't matter which one although Beta Ceti is closer to the front line so that's the logical choice for Placeholder construction. It's not a game breaking decision, but we're definitely losing out by not doing this.
OK, so what happens if next turn we get the nova event somewhere. We'll feed the planet our reserves, but, oh, wait we CAN'T because we don't have any, and we lack a maxed out rich planet to generate them. Or the meklars declare war, and we ask the Silicoids for help, and they would, but they want something for help. They might have settled for reserves, but, instead, they ask for BCV...
If we had a reasonable supply of reserves right now, like 2-3K, I'd agree with maxing the rich planets by feeding them, but we don't, and I don't feel like 200 BC over the long haul is worth running the reserves dry. Sorta like when you buy insurance, it costs you up front, but your better off having it if something goes wrong. Again, just my opinion, and not necessarily right in all cases.
I don't think there's any synergy effect there, they're mostly unrelated problems. I just don't see us being able to sustain an offensive campaign against the Meklar anytime soon (especially with them being allied to the Silicoids). If we go to war, we'll need to be on the defensive.
There is no synergy, that's not the point. The point is, to fix our weapons issues, we need to research four techs. We can't research a good bomb and a good missile at the same time. With the trade, we no longer have to. If we didn't have the AMB's, what do you pick among Omega-V, Fusion Rifle, and Megabolt at the next level? All 3 would be very useful, but, we can't research them simultaneously. And we couldn't afford to research more than one, because at the next level, we hopefully have a desperately needed missile to research.
We CAN, however, research both a weapon and a construction tech at the same time. We can also get to state of the art here in 1 trade (I think). If you want to argue that the Armor is important enough to disregard this... then I accept that as a vaild point of view.
Also, AMB should solve our bomb issue for a long time, and maybe forever. There are several armor upgrades before the last bomb upgrade (keeping in mind that Omega-v is usually a downgrade)
If we will indeed be able to get Zortium from the Silicoids before too long (I hope we'll focus on Planetology research regardless), I'll be more at ease. How sure are you they'll give us Zortium for Atmospheric Terraforming? I would not want to trade them BC mk5 for Duralloy in case of a war, especially since they might honour their alliance anytime and turn on us.
Pretty sure this is just a temporary issue. We'll get Zortium for something shortly. RE: Trading BCV for Duralloy, we'd obviously ask them to declare war on the Meklars first.

That was pretty much what I was thinking when I did it.I'm never afraid of saying I'm right and you're wrongI actually agree with BC mk5 over Planetary Shield V. It helps our missiles a lot and vastly improves our defensive ships. And it lets us try our hand at spying, if we decide to man up for it
![]()
I disagree strongly with research at any R or UR planet. We will be needing ships and reserves in the not too distant future, and we may as well produce those where it's far more cost efficient. Research would be a terrible waste IMO.
Agree 100% on UR planets. Rich planets are more situational. If it was me, I'd not do research at the rich planet till we had more reserves, but I don't think complete

I agree with FF priority, but it's already well funded and mature. Seeding it further wouldn't be very cost efficient.
This.
I always focus too much on Planetology too![]()
I have the opposite problem. I'm a weapons and FF hoe. I like it when their ships look at our planet and just go "Nope, can't scratch that one."

Speaking of scanners, should we go ahead and get battle scanner ships stationed around our empire?
I'm not opposed to these things, but, I also don't get the love for them. I use them when I'm thinking of declaring war on an opponent to see what I'm going to be fighting, but why have them one per world? Why not just build a base? Those come with built in battle scanner. If we want one over the UP and over Maalor, I'd concede that's a useful thing. We could scrap the LR laser ships whenever. They're basically just BC suckers now. (Not much BC, but still)
I'm with jmas, I say we take a gamble on superior missile technology. Our alternatives are not good at all, noone wants to trade us missiles.
Not sure it's that they WONT trade their good missles with us, I suspect it's a case of they DON'T HAVE THEM EITHER.
I've no problem with emphasizing weapons, but, we have a lot of areas that we're gimp. FF and Armor come to mind, and we don't want to ignore computers or planetology. We can probably safely scale back on Proplusion at least, so that's something.