I'm not sure I buy that changes from Civ 4 to Civ 5 have geared the game more towards MP. Natural wonders, city states and more unique and contextual Civ-bonuses have IMO made it less geared towards MP.
Good thing they pretty much got rid of those for beyond earth then.
Always playing it safe, with no room for mistakes, makes for a boring stream to watch.
Not that you have to purposefully make dumb decisions to provide something interesting, but you do have to lean towards risky choices whenever opportunities appear.
Always playing it safe, with no room for mistakes, makes for a boring stream to watch.
Not that you have to purposefully make dumb decisions to provide something interesting, but you do have to lean towards risky choices whenever opportunities appear.
Are you sure you're watching the same stream as the rest of us?
MD's Pac game gave him a super nation, all the other nations was outperformed, after the first war (Where he kind of risked everything, by not making enough military before the AI DoW'ed, in the end it paid off massively to focus so heavy on non-military stuff though, that he could go from zero military to total supremacy in a few turns.).
I wasn't implying MD was playing it safe at all. Quite the contrary.He gambled from the very start. He concentrated entirely on infrastructure, and the only military units he built, iirc, were three tacjets. He lost two cities before his counterattack went in. I'd say there was plenty of risk taking.
I wasn't implying MD was playing it safe at all. Quite the contrary.
I was replying to Magma_Dragoon, who mentioned MD being wasteful and implying he was playing sub-optimally. Which is true, perhaps, but part of what makes the stream interesting. I suppose I should've quoted.