Here's the intrinsic problem with the score calculation: I've won a ~100 BC Domination victory as the Romans on a small Monarch map with 12 civs, and won a ~1950 Conquest victory on a standard map with 7 civs. The first gave me five times the score of the second, even though it was unbelievably easy and only took an hour, compared to the 12 long hours of the second game, which I view as my greatest achievement on Monarch to date.
The score should reflect the challenge of beating the game as you did, which it doesn't even approximate right now. The number of civs has a huge effect on the difficulty (with more civs being easier), which will hopefully will be factored in soon. After all, if you have 18 civs on a map with two cities apiece, taking just two cities of the nearest civ makes you twice as powerful as everyone else. Compare that to taking two cities with 8 leaders in the game and 10 cities apiece, though; the advantage you get over the AI's isn't nearly the same.
