Chief Justice Appointmet
- Thread starter Strider
- Start date
mhcarver
Newspaper Mogul
Name:Mhcarver
Date:Not as often as I'd like
Applying for: Chief justice
Former Experience:Every Judicial office at least three times
You should appoint me because: Since I haven't actually done anything this demogame except lose for elected office, It therefore can't be said that I have any conflict of interest. If appointed I promise to rule on all pending issues within 72 hours of my appointment. I promise now that I will not seek re-election so that I can issue the rulings I believe in and not have to worry about the wrath of the voters My rulings are brief and therefore will be easy to understand, also If i'm not nominated then I will kill a puppy, and possibly a kitten(joke)
Date:Not as often as I'd like
Applying for: Chief justice
Former Experience:Every Judicial office at least three times
You should appoint me because: Since I haven't actually done anything this demogame except lose for elected office, It therefore can't be said that I have any conflict of interest. If appointed I promise to rule on all pending issues within 72 hours of my appointment. I promise now that I will not seek re-election so that I can issue the rulings I believe in and not have to worry about the wrath of the voters My rulings are brief and therefore will be easy to understand, also If i'm not nominated then I will kill a puppy, and possibly a kitten(joke)
Cyc
Looking for the door...
Actually, I'm not real worried about the puppies and kittens, but I will second the nomination of Mhcarver on his past performance. Just hide the key to the wine cellar. 
I support mhcarver and suggest proceeding with the appointment.
donsig
Low level intermediary
DaveShack said:
I suggest we wait the 72 hours so we don't have a repeat of last term.
donsig said:
Whether we have a repeat or not would seem to rest in your hands, since you were the only supporter of waiting 72 hours. Perhaps you should give it a rest.
donsig
Low level intermediary
Actually, I like four days better. 72 hours is already a compromise. And need I point out that it's Friday, so we're coming up on a weekend. Would it be so terrible if an appointment was not made till Monday?
donsig said:
Yes, it would be terrible. Every time we have a delay of any kind, we turn people off and they leave. If your objective for the game is to be the last one standing, waiting is a good course of action to follow, but I'd rather just get all the pending rulings done and move on.
mhcarver
Newspaper Mogul
Well at the moment I'm stuck in a bit of a conundrum, I side with donsig then I will be hurting the game, If I favor being appointed then I'm against the laws and likely subject to some kind of confirmation poll, so I'm going to defer to the president on this one
mhcarver
Newspaper Mogul
Strider said:
![[party]](/images/smilies/partytime.gif "Party [party]")
thank you Mr.President, as a sign of my gratitude, feel free to let yourself into the wine cellar at any time, you know I think I'll take a quick look inside,,,wait a minute who changed the locks
oh well, I'm off to go break the curse of the judiciarySimilar threads
