The 9/11 conspiracy/denial debunking kit

Fox Mccloud

Fox Mccloud

Deity
Joined
Apr 25, 2004
Messages
2,750
Location
The Empire of America
Have you ever in your life had the pleasure of of meeting one of those 9/11 "truther" activists? Did they tell you a bunch of stories about 9/11? Did they ask you to explain some part of their theories? Did know how to answer?

Don't worry, we got you covered. The answers to all the 9/11 denial is out there. You will be able to take on the 9/11 twoofers in no time with the information that has been provided by qualified professionals with peer reviewed work, not conspiracy theorists and anti-American demagogues writing conjecture, disinformation and accuasations with their web sites.

I charge that not a single claim brought forth by the 9/11 truthers can stand up to incontrovertible evidence or any real scrutiny. Every claim, every baseless accuasation and distortion of reality has been answered, corrected and debunked almost line by line.

Here is incontrovertible proof of that:

9/11 conspiracy debunking

Here are some websites that are devoted to debunking 9/11 conspiracies and distortions

Debunking 9/11

9/11 Myths

Links for 9/11 Research

Here Science debunks the conspiracy theories

Good Science and 9-11 Demolition Theories

The BBC

Implosion World

Why Did the World Trade Center Collapse? Science, Engineering, and Speculation

Popular Mechanics

When the Twin Towers Fell

Loose Change thoroughly debunked, point by point

9-11 Loose Change Second Edition Viewer Guide

Screw Loose Change - Not Freakin' Again Edition

Screw Loose Change blog

Now, just a few more

WTC: This Is Their Story

NIST

I hope you can find anything you are looking for. Please use the information contained in the above links or contribute any more you can find.

That is all
 
Lots of good information there. Pity though, because I don't really think that it will help. It isn't information Truthers need, it's brains.
 
What I used to debunk it is my favorite source: common sense.





If some day, we are proven wrong, I have no idea what I would say.
 
I think I never heard the word "debunk" as much as in the last 4 months.. is this a trend? Did some political figure use it some time ago.. whats up with that?
 
Why have a tediously long rational argument, when I can call them frikking ******** nutjobs?
 
So I take it this is the mother of all 9/11 conspiracy/denial debunking threads?
 
Fox Mccloud said:
Have you ever in your life had the pleasure of of meeting one of those 9/11 "truther" activists? Did they tell you a bunch of stories about 9/11? Did they ask you to explain some part of their theories? Did know how to answer?

Don't worry, we got you covered. The answers to all the 9/11 denial is out there. You will be able to take on the 9/11 twoofers in no time with the information that has been provided by qualified professionals with peer reviewed work, not conspiracy theorists and anti-American demagogues writing conjecture, disinformation and accuasations with their web sites.

I charge that not a single claim brought forth by the 9/11 truthers can stand up to incontrovertible evidence or any real scrutiny. Every claim, every baseless accuasation and distortion of reality has been answered, corrected and debunked almost line by line.

Here is incontrovertible proof of that:

9/11 conspiracy debunking

Here are some websites that are devoted to debunking 9/11 conspiracies and distortions

Debunking 9/11

9/11 Myths

Links for 9/11 Research

Here Science debunks the conspiracy theories

Good Science and 9-11 Demolition Theories

The BBC

Implosion World

Why Did the World Trade Center Collapse? Science, Engineering, and Speculation

Popular Mechanics

When the Twin Towers Fell

Loose Change thoroughly debunked, point by point

9-11 Loose Change Second Edition Viewer Guide

Screw Loose Change - Not Freakin' Again Edition

Screw Loose Change blog

Now, just a few more

WTC: This Is Their Story

NIST

I hope you can find anything you are looking for. Please use the information contained in the above links or contribute any more you can find.

That is all
Click to expand...


Thanks for links but im personally not concerned with bombs in the buildings.

I think its common knowledge that the bomb in buildings story is hard to believe/prove.


9/11 Press for Truth, can you give a review of this? I thought some of the accusations interesting like mohammed atta being wired 100,000$

I would appreciate is very much.
 
Thanks for the links. I just got to use (copy paste) the info for another thread.
 
nonconformist said:
Why have a tediously long rational argument, when I can call them frikking ******** nutjobs?
Click to expand...

Because we have more class and intelligence then them and thus we are obligated to hold a rational discussion around it.
 
Rational discussion requires both sides to be rational. When's the last time you spoke to a fully rational 9/11 conspiracy nut?
 
I'm not going to stick around THIS thread (too much hard work), but:

  • Belief that the 'Government' and the press have peddled an inacurate story about 9/11 = crazy tin foil hat loon.
  • Belief that there's a shadowy World Islamic conspiracy against the West = perfectly sane.

:crazyeye:

There's a third choice here, which is 'be patient and keep open-minded'. :goodjob:
 
Xenocrates said:
  • Belief that the 'Government' and the press have peddled an inacurate story about 9/11 = crazy tin foil hat loon.
  • Belief that there's a shadowy World Islamic conspiracy against the West = perfectly sane.

:crazyeye:
Click to expand...

Neither of these are right. It was simply just some pissed off renegade terrorists that attacked us.
 
philippe said:
you guys can debunk some of the conspiracy theories, but can you debunk this?
Click to expand...

I'm sure you are joking, but just to put this out there.....

That same picture has been out there before, only recently new faces have been put in place of the guy since the guy from the 'original' faked picture came forward and admitted he altered the picture.

1. 9/11 was a warm, sunny day whereas the picture seems to depict it being winter.

2. The plane is approaching from the north, which would mean it was the one that hit the north tower. The north tower didn't have an observation deck.

3. The observation deck in the south tower didn't open until 9:30, but the plane hit at 8:49.

4. The picture is of a 757, not a 767.

http://www.snopes.com/rumors/photos/tourist.asp
 
Rhymes said:
I think I never heard the word "debunk" as much as in the last 4 months.. is this a trend? Did some political figure use it some time ago.. whats up with that?
Click to expand...

The high-point in this forum for 'debunk' was 2006. But this year is on pace to pass that mark...Don't worry, things will slow down. Many of the Ron Paul fan boys are starting to realize he has no chance of winning so they are catching up on spitting out their theories instead of spending time on him.

Number of times 'Debunk' was used in CFC threads:

2001-1
2002-8
2003-31
2004-59
2005-40
2006-72
2007-61
2008-15
 
^ But one must also take into account the number of members CFC had at the time. :)

Not that I'm supporting conspiracy theories at all, just pointing that out.
 
Bamspeedy said:
I'm sure you are joking, but just to put this out there.....

That same picture has been out there before, only recently new faces have been put in place of the guy since the guy from the 'original' faked picture came forward and admitted he altered the picture.

1. 9/11 was a warm, sunny day whereas the picture seems to depict it being winter.

2. The plane is approaching from the north, which would mean it was the one that hit the north tower. The north tower didn't have an observation deck.

3. The observation deck in the south tower didn't open until 9:30, but the plane hit at 8:49.

4. The picture is of a 757, not a 767.

http://www.snopes.com/rumors/photos/tourist.asp
Click to expand...
The light on the guys head is from behind and to the left. Exactly the opposite needed to cast his shadow.
 
Bamspeedy said:
The high-point in this forum for 'debunk' was 2006. But this year is on pace to pass that mark...Don't worry, things will slow down. Many of the Ron Paul fan boys are starting to realize he has no chance of winning so they are catching up on spitting out their theories instead of spending time on him.

Number of times 'Debunk' was used in CFC threads:

2001-1
2002-8
2003-31
2004-59
2005-40
2006-72
2007-61
2008-15
Click to expand...


Not all Ron Paul supporters are conspiracy theorists.

I think we all know Ron Paul doesnt have a real chance to win, the point is to spread the message and make ground work.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Similar threads

Eddie Verdde
The ultimate list of resources - A festival of colors and flavours and an alternative system.
Replies
7
Views
631
Eddie Verdde
Eddie Verdde
SpacemanSpiff
[RD] Remembering 9-11-2001 (20 freaking years later)
2 3 4
Replies
68
Views
6K
r16
r16
T
review after winning twice on deity marathon
Replies
0
Views
1K
tsuneomai
T
M
The Chiron Archives, a revived/replica fanfic site
Replies
0
Views
380
MysticWind
M
Lord Lakely
Finally played the game, here's my honest first impression.
Replies
12
Views
1K
Lord Lakely
Lord Lakely
Back
Top Bottom