Why Poland was an option,

Status
Not open for further replies.

TheLastOne36

Deity
Joined
Jan 17, 2007
Messages
14,045
WARNING: I'm a nationalistic sometimes biased Pole, so information here may be a little exaggerated. :p
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

Hello, with all the hipe going around over Poland, People are getting tired of poland. Well not Poland but the people who keep on debating it, making fun of Poland, and just tired of hearing Poland from all of these posts. So knowing me i have made a very long thread for pure discussing of Poland so that we don't have to discuss it and annoy other people outside this thread.

Please after the making of this thread, could you please move any arguments onto this thread instead of debating it over at other threads?
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Great now i'm glad we got that out of our system, now i'm gonna list a few arguments for poland.
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Argument Against: Poland didn't have a long history, so why is it an option?
Answer: Your absolutely wrong.

Polish History: Part A: Prehistory - Before there was a unified Poland, there was many Slavic, Celtic, Germanic and Baltic tribes. The one that stood out from the rest the most was the Slavic tribes living along the Vistula river Valley.

Sometime later, the Polish tribes (who are slavic if you didn't know ;) ) started conquering lands around it. This took place at around 700 BC with the dating of the Archeology site at Biskupin. At this time Polish tribes were already well aware of how to use Iron. There is also a Theory that ancient Polish tribes invented Iron Working before the Hittites did, Although there is no proof of this as of yet. <Seen that on the discovery channel :D .

City States and later a Kingdom rose. Later on in history, the beginning of the state of Poland started when Polish King Mieszko I Converted into Christianity. This is the first recorded King of Poland. (i think). After the Baptize of Mieszko I, Roman Catholic Christianity was adopted as the new state religion of Poland. After this many people in Poland was Baptized and this was the end of Polish Prehistory.

Poland as you see here, a very old nation. And unlike the state of Isreal who has no real straight connection to the ancient Kingdom of Isreal, Modern day Poland does have a direct Connection to the ancient Polish tribes.

I think i covered it well enough to move on.
--------------------------------------------------------------------
Argument Against: Ok Poland was a nation for a long time, But hasn't been a state for that long. (from after the Baptize of Mieszko I).
Answer: Poland has spent most of her history under her on control.

i remember someone saying that he done the statistics and apparently poland hasn't been a state for only about 20 or 30 % of her history (forgot which one and i forgot who posted it).

If someone finds the post please post it here.
------------------------------------------------------------------
Argument against: Ok, But why poland before other civs such as Austria?
Answer: Poland is Slavic. Russia is Slavic. Every other slav is slavic :rolleyes: . And Many non-Russian slavs hate being represented by only Russia, since the last century has been, well rather harsh to slavs. and the root to that problem was the soviet union. If you have a brain you know what i mean. So having both Poland and Russia will help the problem with the slavic market. Austria in particular isn't slavic, but Germanic so it doesn't really help the situation. And just to let you know, I'd rather have Austria then Poland, but i don't care which one get's in as long as one get's in.(just to eliminate a couple future arguments)

It just doesn't stop there. East europe is seriously underrepresented. The only east european country in the game there is Russia. And i can't believe Fireaxis was stupid enough to count germany, HRE and Ottomans as part of East Europe.

And then Austria is central europe. Not East nor West specifically. Same thing goes from Poland. Except Poland can be a Central European and an east european so just more reasons why Poland was a good choice.
------------------------------------------------------------
Argument Against: Ok why Poland over other Slavic Countries?
Answer? What better country to represent the remaining slavic country other then Poland? Yugoslavia is to new, Ukraine has to much similarities to russia, i really can't think of anything else a better candidate then Poland.
------------------------------------------------------------------------
I'm running outta time but i'll add more elater. Discuss some things here and when i get back i'll post more.
 
Sure Poland was an option for BTS. Just as Austria, the Holy Roman Empire, the Hittites, Vietnam, Belgium, Scotland and various other interesting nations, civilizations and ethnic groups could have been included.

But we know the 10 new BTS civs, we know Poland will not be one of them. There already have been petitions and countless threads about this. I think the message will get through and maybe Poland will be included in a third expansion or in CIV V. Or maybe no. It's wait and see now. There is nothing left to discuss and nothing left to do and see what the next Civilization products will bring.
Can we just stop with this argument and move forward to actual discussion about gameplay, strategy and Boudica?
 
Can we just stop with this argument and move forward to actual discussion about gameplay, strategy and Boudica

hehe,/ Hear, hear!
 
yes but posts are countlessly goona erupt other threads about poland so i made a Poland trhead for all the discussing. and all the biased jerks can post in here instead of in the other threads and we have a full team to shoot them down :king:

Yes i do rule.
 
yes but posts are countlessly goona erupt other threads about poland so i made a Poland trhead for all the discussing. and all the biased jerks can post in here instead of in the other threads and we have a full team to shoot them down :king:

Yes i do rule.

You are a king among men.
 
People don't want Poland in, because it doesn't have a long history. This is indeed a lie if they think that. It is just that people have different preferences.
Nations/civilizations cannot be compared. Why most people respond very harsh to some Polish forum members is because these Polish forum members say that Poland is better than another civs (or civs already included) and they often deny it afterwards. Can you blame other members for responding negatively to that? And when these members are justifying why, they are called racist or ignorant.
I think Firaxis only adds civs from Europe if they had global impact (Portuguese and Dutch), non-European civs don't have to fulfill this criteria. By these criteria the HRE is indeed strange, but I have the idea they wanted to fill the space up with one more European civ with great regional influence. They could choose from the most obvious choices: Poland-Lithuania, Austria and the HRE, and they choose HRE.
Please stop this thread. People who know at least some Polish history, will immediately say that Poland indeed had a chance. But it just didn't make the cut. Better luck next time.
 
Gah Poland does have a long history. Over 1000 years long since it became a state. Not to mention the ancient Polish tribes along the Vistula river.

And it's quite obvious that it's the Polish members who aren't saying that. I know some are but Chopin for example isn't polish and he said Poland's better then Dutch.
 
Gah Poland does have a long history. Over 1000 years long since it became a state. Not to mention the ancient Polish tribes along the Vistula river.

And it's quite obvious that it's the Polish members who aren't saying that. I know some are but Chopin for example isn't polish and he said Poland's better then Dutch.

I don't think Comrade Aart said, that he believed that Poland didn't have a long history, I think he was reacting to people who claimed that it didn't have one.

I think you misread his post completely and missed Aerts point. Because it seems you both pretty much agree.
 
I don't think Comrade Aart said, that he believed that Poland didn't have a long history, I think he was reacting to people who claimed that it didn't have one.

I think you misread his post completely and missed Aerts point. Because it seems you both pretty much agree.

I reread it and i think he was referring to me in one of my earlier posts.

I wonder if you knew that Poland has a greater history then many countries including Spain, Portugal, Dutch, and English. (might be wrong on some of them)

I don't have the best english ever. I MEANT LONGER NOT GREATER/RICHER WHEN WILL PEOPLE GET THAT. :crazyeye:

yes, and he is a idiot, just like the poles. get over it.

So you just called an entire ethnic group idiots?
 
There is a lot of miscommunication in this thread. :D

Onagan was quite harsh. I don't think he means it.
 
yes, and he is a idiot, just like the poles. get over it.

Dear moderators, can you please ban this user? Not only does his message contain a gratuitous and unprovoked insult directed at myself, but he also a makes an openly racist remark, which should be unacceptable by the forum's rules.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top Bottom