Ank10 - 3CC AWM

Ankka · Oct 13, 2004

Ank09, the 3CC AWR game came out nice and victorious, only a little past year 1500. So, we're doing it again on Monarch.

Settings:
Map size: Standard
Map type: 70% Pangaea
Other map settings: Random
Civilization: Ottomans
Difficulty: Monarch :eek:

Civ 3 version: Play the World 1.27f

Roster: [FULL]
Sir Bugsy
grs
Bede
andvruss
Ankka

Let the game begin!

Would you like to generate some starts, Bugs?

Sir Bugsy · Oct 13, 2004

Commander Bugs reporting for duty.

It may be a while before I get it done. Give me 24 hours.

RowAndLive · Oct 13, 2004

Gee, only 1 reply, and I'm still too late.... :cry:

I guess I'll have to watch....

grs · Oct 13, 2004

signing in

andvruss · Oct 13, 2004

I am here.

Bede · Oct 13, 2004

Checking in.

Ankka · Oct 14, 2004

Sorry about that, R&L. The game was decided already when we finished Ank09. And IMHO 6 people is a bit much in an SG...

Unless Bugs says you can be in. It's up to him, the Commander. :salute:

RowAndLive · Oct 14, 2004

That's OK, I'll watch. I have another I'll be starting up in. Thanks.

Sir Bugsy · Oct 14, 2004

Start #1

Start #2

Start #3

Start #4

Start #5
These all stink Bugsy, roll some more.

grs · Oct 14, 2004

1 - 2 rivers, many hills, but not a single bg or resource - out.
2 - rivers a fp, 3bg and sugar, does the swamp (grassland or bg later) ruin it? - gets a maybe
3 - not bad, not great, but to central imho - out.
4 - 3fp and a wheat will allow fast growth and will allow us to work the mountains later on - gold is nice to, but the start will be shield poor - a maybe.

5 - if we don't want it ultra hard, I would say 5

Bede · Oct 14, 2004

Concur with grs. 2&4 maybe, 5 definitely.

Ankka · Oct 15, 2004

Bugsy, PTW please. No swamps.

You did it again.

And PTW gives better starts, too.

Which means I vote #5.

Sir Bugsy · Oct 15, 2004

You're right. I did roll those on [c3c]

Belay my last. Proper starts to follow.

Sir Bugsy · Oct 15, 2004

Round Two

Start 1

Start 2

Start 3

Start 4

grs · Oct 15, 2004

Start 3 for me - shield-o-rama

Start 4 would be my second choice, many shields too, flood plains and gems for later mining.

Bede · Oct 15, 2004

And again, concur with grs: start 3.

(Bede goes looking for his 12ga and bird dog again)

Sir Bugsy · Oct 15, 2004

For me it's a toss up between 3 and 4. I could go with either one.

I thought having the coast nearby on the first two was worthwhile sharing with everyone. Having one front, or at least at three sided front would be helpful. I think the shield production of the last two outweigh the strategic advantages of the first two.

Sir Bugsy · Oct 16, 2004

If I haven't heard from Ankka and Andvruss by tomorrow this time, I'll play start #3.

Ankka · Oct 16, 2004

I was caught by RL and was at a camp - type thing today... but now I got posting.

IMHO start #3 is the best by far. Take it.

We propably should try a similar archer rush as last time.. and then start building warriors and upgrade to swords, then turn onto HBR and start building horses > knights > sipahis.

And I said PTW gives better starts, as there are more bonus resources than in C3C.

andvruss · Oct 16, 2004

3 or 4 look good. I guess I will go with the majority, 3.

Ank10 - 3CC AWM

Deity

Civ.D.

RAMMING SPEED!

nameless one

Deity

Deity

Deity

RAMMING SPEED!

Civ.D.

nameless one

Deity

Deity

Civ.D.

Civ.D.

nameless one

Deity

Civ.D.

Civ.D.

Deity

Deity

Similar threads