TerrisH
Mischief?
Okay, almost Ready to send orders, but need to ask the Mod a few Questions.
but his inbox is full, so I'll wait. say when you clear it!
but his inbox is full, so I'll wait. say when you clear it!
Then the USC must inquire as to how the situation on Rana devolved so badly over the span of several years and ended in the unnecessary termination of life of multiple citizens if such practices are indeed in place.Nekomi said:we agree with the Colonials On Point One, but are utterly confused by the USC's request concerning Point to, and somewhat on Point three.
"Prudence, indeed, will dictate that Governments long established should not be changed for light and transient causes; and accordingly all experience hath shewn, that mankind are more disposed to suffer, while evils are sufferable, than to right themselves by abolishing the forms to which they are accustomed. But when a long train of abuses and usurpations, pursuing invariably the same Object evinces a design to reduce them under absolute Despotism, it is their right, it is their duty, to throw off such Government, and to provide new Guards for their future security."CFS said:The Nekomi utilized force as a last resort, a resort which is well recognized as being legitimate when necessary.
And exactly what international law is the CFS citing? The only authority currently in existence on international space law is the UPNCS, being the only direct, legitimate continuation of an organization which predates the Scourge and issued rulings on such matters. Or, is the CFS presuming that the UPNCS is violating its own precepts? And then, for what purpose does it allege it is doing so? The USC has reviewed the statues on such matters and its legal experets have seen no reason for their dismissal. We are more than willing to allow full transparency of our findings to whatever faction might be interested in seeing the relevent materials.CFS said:Second, the second and third conditions the USC demands upon the Nekomi are on the verge of violating the fundamental principles of international law of state soveriegnty.
The USC has already noted its decision to adhere to all UPNCS declared laws, referendums, and international decisions, with the election to restrain the execution of these decisions by its own means*. Perhaps the CFS government has not been doing its data-mining thoroughly enough.CFS said:We direct the international community's attention to the agreement between Sol and the USC, wherin, "dictating its own domestic policies while defering to the U.S.C. in foreign and military matters." Thus, by declaring, on its own intiative and violating the principles of sovereignty, the UPNCS has violated the terms of its agreement with the USC. Further evidence a need for the USC to rectify this problem
That is both hypocritical in light of former diplomatic precedent by all core nations and furthermore not an option unless you wish to ignore USC policy as well, which would not be wise.CFS said:(from this point forward, the CFS will not recognize statements or demands from the UPNCS and requests all other states to do so as well).
It is the opinion of the USC government that that is the process commonly known as "Democracy." We believe Emergent Datalinks may contain an entry on the concept.Emergents said:The Emergents are in general agreement with the Colonial Federation of Sezuren, in that a second referendum will lead to little else than a cascade of referendums, the losing side each time demanding a new referendum a year later or when events swing in their favor.
It is the opinion of the Emergents that sarcastic misinterpretations are not the process commonly known as "Diplomacy". We believe that USC Datalinks may contain information on the relation between "Democracy" and "Localized demands to ignore legitimate authority".It is the opinion of the USC government that that is the process commonly known as "Democracy." We believe Emergent Datalinks may contain an entry on the concept.
OOC: As Massive Attack noted, this sort of puts the UNPCS in a bind with regards to their agreement with the USC, though.Symphony D. said:P.S. Ya'll fail. Did I post those demands? No. Did I demand the blockade on the Nekomi? No. So don't call them USC demands, because if you'll notice, the USC isn't issuing them, just executing them. It's hard to negotiate with people who can't even get their facts right.
OOC: Which has nothing to do with anything given of course no single government of whatever principles will generally allow its component parts to disinvest themselves of that government.OOC: In other words, Texas v. White, in which the United States Supreme Court 'held that the Constitution did not permit states to secede from the United States, and that the ordinances of secession, and all the acts of the legislatures within seceding states intended to give effect to such ordinances, were "absolutely null".'
And to note that the self-declared independence of Sealand does not cause it to appear at the United Nations.
Which generally falls precisely in line with what the Declaration of Independence says, which is rather amazing considering that document is nothing more than effectively a manifesto, and is in no way legally binding. Thus, your argument on this point is overly generalized as regards the Supreme Court's findings.The union between Texas and the other States was as complete, as perpetual, and as indissoluble as the union between the original States. There was no place for reconsideration, or revocation, except through revolution, or through consent of the States.
Please people, don't bring this into yet another long-winded OOC discussion on real-world legalities. Discuss things IC, or don't discuss. We all know what happened last time.
TO: Colonial Federation of Sezuren, Emergents, Nekomi
CC: Wideband
FROM: United Systems Commonwealth
Then the USC must inquire as to how the situation on Rana devolved so badly over the span of several years and ended in the unnecessary termination of life of multiple citizens if such practices are indeed in place.
And exactly what international law is the CFS citing? The only authority currently in existence on international space law is the UPNCS, being the only direct, legitimate continuation of an organization which predates the Scourge and issued rulings on such matters. Or, is the CFS presuming that the UPNCS is violating its own precepts? And then, for what purpose does it allege it is doing so? The USC has reviewed the statues on such matters and its legal experts have seen no reason for their dismissal. We are more than willing to allow full transparency of our findings to whatever faction might be interested in seeing the relevant materials.
The USC, until a Resolution to the contrary by the UPNCS, will maintain its blockade of all systems under its control leading to Nekomi space in response to the needless loss of life precipitated by its defense forces on Rana** until such time as that matter has been resolved satisfactorily, although it makes no statements on what constitutes such a resolution of the situation at this time pending statements by the UPNCS. It will be noted that any attempt to violate USC space in violation of this blockade will be considered a hostile and aggressive action against the USC and all necessary defensive actions will be taken to repulse such an incursion.
OOC: * Imagine, if you will, the United Nations (and the World Court and so on), and its constituent nations, only not crappy or weak, and there being only one subcomponent. It makes statements and policy. It doesn't execute them. Separation of powers.
P.S. Ya'll fail. Did I post those demands? No. Did I demand the blockade on the Nekomi? No. So don't call them USC demands, because if you'll notice, the USC isn't issuing them, just executing them. It's hard to negotiate with people who can't even get their facts right.
What happened last time? We resolved the discussion? I dont remember mods barging in.
We do not desire to commit the abuses of peoples of the past.From: The people of Lacaille*
To: Democratic Autarchy of Huris
We will give you the benefit of doubt in that you did not know of our existance. We find it somewhat wierd though, and it does not speak very highly of you that your first thoughts when coming to a system, any system, has not been to search long and hard for any survivors. But be that as it may, it does not matter much now. What does matter is that you somehow think that you, and not us, have the legal rights to our planet, the planet where we have been toiling for the past decades. What are we then, the Cherokee of the space age, inconvenient people who just happen to live where you've drawn your claims on a map?
We will welcome your ships and delegates, we will accept any aid given, simply because it would be foolish to do elsewise. But do not presume that you own us, or our home. We are free people, we choose our own destiny.
To: U.S.C. and Sol
Why will you not recognize our desire to be a part of the Commonwealth?
* Sent with the help of U.S.C. forces present.
To Emergents, NAM
From Furians
We have investigated the incident surrounding Acrux, We have discovered that the Emergent laid claim to it first verbally. So they hold the right to kick you out if they so choose. If you choose to peacefully leave Acrux we, the Furians, will leave Kruger. I hope this will help prevent a war.